Active shooter situation in Maine, hospital says 'mass casualty, mass shooter' event

Nomad said:
This nation is socially regressive with or without gun ownership.

But you're right about the direction in which the facts are pointing, though.

We are an inferior species that deserves to go extinct.

There's no reason for "sporting firearms" to exist because in spite of what the enthusiasts claim to the contrary, there is nothing about the shooting of firearms that can be considered a sport.

Especially hunting.

How does using the clever technology available to hunters today, to stalk dumb animals in the wild minding their own business, then from a great distance, firing a high caliber lead projectile into their rib cage, constitute a sport?

Nothing sporting about it.

If people want to hunt, let them learn how to use a bow and arrow.
Click to expand...

I have personally never hunted.

I used to shoot cans and bottles when I was a kid,
only instead of doing it with a scruffy .22,
I did it with handsome and expensive high end firearms which I enjoyed collecting.
Obviously, I also left the city to do it.

However, I do eat meat so I have no moral high ground to criticize hunters.
I just don't like to do my own wetwork.
There's excellent meat at the butcher shop, all ready to cook.

Also, I don't believe bow hunting is humane, but claim no expertise on the subject.

In the end, if people enjoy shooting guns, then they should have guns, whether they're good for society or not.
I'm only opposed to the private ownership of para-military weaponry like AR-15s because the deranged can kill too many people too fast with them.
 
JesusAI said:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=franklin+coverup&ia=web


[video=youtube;8b61iIQCapY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8b61iIQCapY&themeRefresh=1[/vide]
Click to expand...
The Franklin child prostitution ring allegations began in June 1988 in Omaha, Nebraska and attracted significant public and political interest until late 1990, when separate state and federal grand juries concluded that the allegations were unfounded and the ring was a "carefully crafted hoax."

Awesome. What about it?
 
JesusAI said:
pay attention ass-ranger.


the nations with less guns have more child rape.
Click to expand...

LOL

Just about the stupidest fucking argument against gun restrictions that I’ve ever seen.

Definitely, the stupidest fucking post of the day. Since we’ll be talking to other Trumpers and gun apologists today, that’s really an accomplishment!
 
Doc Dutch said:
You don't believe Japan is a First World nation, domer? Is it because they have yellow skin and slanted eyes? They have a democracy. South Korea?
Click to expand...

Yep, they are. Do I really have to use crayons and draw a picture fir you?

What is their gun violence compared to ours?
 
Doc Dutch said:
The Franklin child prostitution ring allegations began in June 1988 in Omaha, Nebraska and attracted significant public and political interest until late 1990, when separate state and federal grand juries concluded that the allegations were unfounded and the ring was a "carefully crafted hoax."

Awesome. What about it?
Click to expand...

it's not a hoax and you're carrying pedo water.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
I have personally never hunted.

I used to shoot cans and bottles when I was a kid,
only instead of doing it with a scruffy .22,
I did it with handsome and expensive high end firearms which I enjoyed collecting.
Obviously, I also left the city to do it.

However, I do eat meat so I have no moral high ground to criticize hunters.
I just don't like to do my own wetwork.
There's excellent meat at the butcher shop, all ready to cook.

Also, I don't believe bow hunting is humane, but claim no expertise on the subject.

In the end, if people enjoy shooting guns, then they should have guns, whether they're good for society or not.
I'm only opposed to the private ownership of para-military weaponry like AR-15s because the deranged can kill too many people too fast with them.
Click to expand...

Deranged people aren't legally allowed to own ANY guns.

I have a couple of AR 15s they are simply the BEST TOOL for eradication of feral pigs which are a HUGE problem for farmers.

 
Last edited:
SmarterthanYou said:
typical leftist, making shit up to support their fuckery. That is not what I said........wanna try again?

should I wait?
Click to expand...

Yep, you sure as shit did.

“Vehicles cannot be necessary” in a modern society because they are not a designated right. That’s exactly the bullshit you tried to peddle.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
Click to expand...

I was issued an M-16.
I suppose that you were as well.

One difference between us is that I wasn't too stupid to notice that it was an anti-personnel offense weapon that had no place in civilian life.
Only seriously deficient idiots who believe that they have a constitutional right to overthrow a legitimately elected government think otherwise.

As for the constitution, it isn't radical or extreme; it's just shit.
It gave us the most inefficient form of government on the face of the planet.

Any competent high school sophomore could buy a book on parliamentary procedure from Barnes & Noble
and come up with a more sane form of government.

Smarter than you?
You're less smart than a ewe in heat.
 
domer76 said:
Yep, you sure as shit did.
Click to expand...

“Vehicles cannot be necessary” in a modern society because they are not a designated right. That’s exactly the bullshit you tried to peddle.[/QUOTE]
I see you had to backtrack...........now stop lying so I don't have to call you out on it all the time. maybe you might be able to learn about rights, freedoms, and liberty at some point.
 
leaningright said:
"greater restrictions" = out of the hands of everyone but the elite class ... at least in most countries.
Click to expand...

I’ll settle for out of the hands of everyone who doesn’t have a specific need for one. That includes all public carry.

Heller said one has a right to a weapon IN THE HOME for the purpose of personal protection. Specifically, Scalia pointed to handguns as the traditional weapon of personal protection. I’m good with that

Otherwise, a FEDERAL crime to possess a weapon anywhere else along with the most restrictive gun laws legally permissible works for me.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
“Vehicles cannot be necessary” in a modern society because they are not a designated right. That’s exactly the bullshit you tried to peddle.
Click to expand...
I see you had to backtrack...........now stop lying so I don't have to call you out on it all the time. maybe you might be able to learn about rights, freedoms, and liberty at some point.[/QUOTE]

LOL

Your reading comprehension sucks as badly as your comprehension of the Bill of Rights.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
I was issued an M-16.
I suppose that you were as well.

One difference between us is that I wasn't too stupid to notice that it was an anti-personnel offense weapon that had no place in civilian life.
Only seriously deficient idiots who believe that they have a constitutional right to overthrow a legitimately elected government think otherwise.

As for the constitution, it isn't radical or extreme; it's just shit.
It gave us the most inefficient form of government on the face of the planet.

Any competent high school sophomore could buy a book on parliamentary procedure from Barnes & Noble
and come up with a more sane form of government.

Smarter than you?
You're less smart than a ewe in heat.
Click to expand...

you could have just said that freedom terrifies you. that would make better sense. if you don't like it here, nothing is keeping you here.
 
domer76 said:
I see you had to backtrack...........now stop lying so I don't have to call you out on it all the time. maybe you might be able to learn about rights, freedoms, and liberty at some point.
Click to expand...

LOL

Your reading comprehension sucks as badly as your comprehension of the Bill of Rights.[/QUOTE]

you're projecting. don't be mad because I keep confronting you with truth and reality. just accept that i'm right.
 
leaningright said:
"greater restrictions" = out of the hands of everyone but the elite class ... at least in most countries.
Click to expand...
I need further explanation of this statement, do you mean elites own most of the guns or have private security? How does gun control = guns for elites only?
 
ExpressLane said:
Deranged people are legally allowed to own ANY guns.

I have a couple of AR 15s they are simply the BEST TOOL for eradication of feral pigs which are a HUGE problem for farmers.
Click to expand...

Yes, deranged people are legally allowed to own any guns, I agree.
I just don't agree that that's a sane situation for us to preserve.

I also don't agree that .223 ammunition is big enough to humanely kill pigs.
Obviously, "humane" is not a consideration with you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top