Is violence acceptable?

Fox claimed on their first day that all other media was lying

The fox began to be sued for their lies and deceit


They just keep losing these cases

Soon they won’t have money to run the lie factory
 
Libhater said:
The de-unification party was and still is the demorat party, and this de-unification started under the racist regime of obama and continues to divide America in every way imaginable under this current demrat administration. And the dem Christian hating, demoralizing our school children, this two-tiered injustice system, and constant race baiting by the dem rats is just adding to the divide of our nation.
Click to expand...

And now a commercial break from FoKKKs "News" :laugh:
 
evince said:
Belief that use of force is justified to restore Trump to the presidency has increased
6.9 percent
We will CRUSH YOU
Click to expand...

Ironic that it is the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses that encourage violence against Supreme Court Justices, our cities and their political opponents.

 
It is the right wing saying they will murder Americans


We will protect ours selves



Those who try will die
 
Doc Dutch said:
A post you could never quote, Fat Boy. Is it because that's not what was posted? That you are simply a gutless liar who rides the coattails of your brothers?

Your reputation and mine are here for all to see, Fat Boy. You're the one threatening to beat me up and I'm the one who, like RB 60's threats, would let you as long is it's recorded for criminal prosecution...something that caused you to have a conniption. LOL





Notice all the cowardly bullshit artists on JPP are claiming it's my fault they are putting me on ignore. :)

Also notice how easy it is to quote the actual posts of people, Fat Boy. :thup:
Click to expand...

EVERYBODY in here knows you for exactly what you are. What I posted about you and your threats was exactly how it happened. What,...did you think I was the only one to see those posts before you so cowardly deleted them later? Dont be so dumb. Lots of people did. Im not claiming to be some saint,....but regardless of what I am i know that I am one hell of a lot better than you when it comes to my character. Which isnt saying much,.. really. One thing for sure,....as soon as this little " thing" is over with you today,...your ass is going on ignore where it belongs. Life is too short to suffer fools like YOU.
 
Thirty-five years after it was first imposed, a judge has lifted a consent decree barring the Republican National Committee from pursuing “ballot security” measures.

In their 1981 lawsuit to stop the RNC from engaging in certain practices at the polls, the Democratic National Committee attested that in a New Jersey gubernatorial election, the RNC had sent sample ballots to communities of color, and then had the names for each ballot returned as undeliverable removed from voter rolls. Democrats also alleged that the RNC hired off-duty cops to patrol majority-minority precincts, wearing “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands. These details were enough to secure a consent decree between the two party organizations and the court in 1982, stopping the GOP from engaging in such voter-intimidation practices.


Except, Democrats alleged, they didn’t stop. The consent decree was updated in 1987 after Republicans created a voter-challenge list of black voters from whom letters had been returned as undeliverable, with an RNC official saying that the list could “keep the black vote down considerably.” The decree was modified again in 1990 after a court ruled the RNC had violated it by not telling state parties about its provisions, which had led to the North Carolina GOP sending 150,000 postcards to potential voters listing voting regulations, in an apparent attempt at intimidation. The GOP violated the court order again in 2004 after yet another voter-challenge list targeted black voters.

With that history of behavior in full view, federal courts moved to allow the decree to expire in December 2017, a decision that was finalized Tuesday by a federal district court. For the first time in three decades, the RNC can pursue ballot-security measures without court preclearance.




The question is whether an unfettered RNC will return to the vote-challenging and poll-watching practices that were repeatedly found to be in violation of the Voting Rights Act. Even during the decades when the Republican National Committee was under court order, schemes like challenging voters with undeliverable mail, known as “voter caging,” have flourished. Similarly, states have pursued initiatives, like voter ID, to address the undocumented specter of widespread voter fraud. Yet, as the University of California, Irvine, School of Law professor Rick Hasen argued in November at Slate, it’s unlikely that the RNC itself will be directly challenging votes in the near future. The RNC had to prove it hadn’t recently violated the consent decree in order to be freed from it, and risks ending up right back under another court order in the future if it should change course.
 
They kept cheating even after being caught and punished and watched for their crimes against voters and Democracy


They just did more crimes once removed from the restrictions



There is no like record for the Democratic party
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top