More evidence why gun ownership should always be legal

Chapdog

Abreast of the situations
http://www.kfor.com/news/local/kfor-news-woman-shoots-intruder-story,0,2782969.story

CHANDLER, OK -- For a Lincoln County woman it was a life or death situation after a random stranger tried to break into her rural home late Thursday night. "She confronted the man from inside the house immediately called 911, told him that she was armed and that she had called the police and he needed to leave," said Sheriff Chuck Mangion.

The alleged suspect, Billy D. Riley, has an extensive criminal history involving drugs and alcohol and according to investigators, Riley was near the victim's home after he wrecked his truck out front.

"Once he smashed the glass out he stepped into the residence and she used the shotgun to fire one shot which hit the intruder center of the chest and (he) fell back out of the house," said Mangion.

Hours after the incident investigators are still trying to figure out why he tried to break in; this crime is still under investigation.

It has to be investigated as a homicide and all the facts of the investigation will be gathered and forwarded to the district attorney's'office.

According to investigators, Riley's sister was also in the truck with him during the accident, but she was not involved in the attempted break in.
 
The George Bush admin was all the final proof I needed to see that Americans should always be allowed to purchase guns.
 
And if the gun fraidy cats had there way this woman would have just been another victim. Call the police, wait, and hope that your assailant, who was so crazed that after she told him she was armed and had called the police still broke in, doesn't come in and rape or kill you.
 
lmao...you really are a kook....

why haven't you then risen up and turn your talk into actual sedition against the government evince? you're all cattle and no hat

Becuase the system worked and Bush and team were thrown out peacefully by an election they could not manipulate enough to win.

We came close but the system worked , thank you founding fathers.
 
If you wanted to gather evidence for or against gun ownership, you would provide evidence that murders would either rise or decline in the absence or presence of guns. Not sensational anecdotal stories that promote your cause.
 
It's not as if gun ownership is even under assault. I don't know why the NRA folks feel so much need to defend an already well-defended position.
 
no one I know wants guns banned so why is it an issue?

What kind of restrictions do they have/want on registration? What kind of tax do some propose on ammo or components? I already cannot give a gun as a gift to my kid due to government meddling. These kinds of back door efforts by some on the left continues to keep the issue alive and well.
 
Back
Top