Target is targeting children tuck friendly bathing suits in the kids section

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wok...rived,to racial prejudice and discrimination".



This is the REAL definition


Republicans lie about what it means because they are lying turd bags




Woke is an adjective derived from African-American Vernacular English (AAVE) meaning "alert to racial prejudice and discrimination".[1][2] Beginning in the 2010s, it came to encompass a broader awareness of social inequalities, such as sexism, and has also been used as shorthand for some ideas of the American Left involving identity politics and social justice, such as white privilege and slavery reparations for African Americans.[3][4][5]
 
Wrong

The government should not be deciding these things


MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS AND THEIR FAMILIES SHOULD MAKE THAT DECISION

Right, we should decide they can't drink, watch rated R movies, join the military, or (IMHO, not until you're an adult) get married, but irreversible decisions like surgery they are clearly able to consent to...

Anyway, IMHO, you are wrong. Chemical castration and irreversible surgery for a youngster is child abuse, as it would be to stop them from tucking or binding if they wanted to try those things. At this age they are still trying to define themselves, it should not be allowed for someone to take that future choice from them by giving premature "consent" in their stead.
 
Please don't suggest, Vinny, that I need your permission to do anything.

I don't expect to see you adopting my world view anytime soon either!

You can lie about the words definition all you want



That doesn’t mean I can’t point that out as a lie
 
Right, we should decide they can't drink, watch rated R movies, join the military, or (IMHO, not until you're an adult) get married, but irreversible decisions like surgery they are clearly able to consent to...

Anyway, IMHO, you are wrong. Chemical castration and irreversible surgery for a youngster is child abuse, as it would be to stop them from tucking or binding if they wanted to try those things. At this age they are still trying to define themselves, it should not be allowed for someone to take that future choice from them by giving "consent" in their stead.

Does your child’s medical profession advise you to do those things?
 
Right, we should decide they can't drink, watch rated R movies, join the military, or (IMHO, not until you're an adult) get married, but irreversible decisions like surgery they are clearly able to consent to...

Anyway, IMHO, you are wrong. Chemical castration and irreversible surgery for a youngster is child abuse, as it would be to stop them from tucking or binding if they wanted to try those things. At this age they are still trying to define themselves, it should not be allowed for someone to take that future choice from them by giving "consent" in their stead.

Then too there is the matter that the majority of those who go trans as kids/youth would have if they had been allowed to properly develop would have been homosexuals...this is an open attack on the homosexual community.
 
Then too there is the matter that the majority of those who go trans as kids/youth would have if they had been allowed to properly develop would have been homosexuals...this is an open attack on the homosexual community.

Link to that horse shit?



Go read the actual treatments provided kids who present as trans
 
Does your child’s medical profession advise you to do those things?

It doesn't matter who suggests we should abuse children we still should not, such irrevocable decisions should not be made for anyone before they have reached the age of majority regardless of who is proposing it, it is still child abuse.

I fully support reversible or impermanent gender affirming actions, I do not support chemical castration (especially this one as we find out that specifically for those going from male to female it suppresses the growth of genitalia making it too small to invaginate and making it impossible for their future enjoyment of sexual activities... in short, it makes it so they'll never orgasm... shame that), or early surgeries. Such irreversible actions taking away the choices they will have when they reach majority will always be child abuse.

Help them on their search, do not limit them in their options.
 

"Masks don't work unless we wear them," says Dr. Elie Berbari, a Mayo Clinic infectious diseases physician.

That's what Mayo Clinic researchers say they proved in a recent study.

"We found objectively that masks are critically important. They're very effective at protecting the people around you. If you're wearing a mask, you're protecting others. If they're wearing masks, they're protecting you," says Dr. Matthew Callstrom, a Mayo Clinic radiologist and one of the study's authors.

The experiments used masked and unmasked mannequins that simulated the spread of respiratory droplets and measured it at various distances.

"The most important transmission of a COVID-19 particle is a respiratory droplet. We measured the aerosol particles which are even smaller. And we found that masking was very effective even for those particles, the smallest ones," says Dr. Callstrom.
https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/...inute-study-shows-masks-can-prevent-covid-19/
 
Lady, you must be obsessed with the term- I've never given it one minute of thought!

The only time I have even ever heard the word Woke used, was on Fox FUCKING news!

What I think, is if you are racist or a gay basher- YOU USE THE WORD A LOT.

Yes, the racists and bigots have found themselves a whole new toy to play with.

Woke, for the Biggots has become the NIGGER word! The word is only used as a Mockery today, and who the fuck knows what they are trying to mock?

Because Biggots like FOX FUCKING NEWS use the term to mock everything they do not like!

If the shoe fits- YOU WEAR IT OK!

Next!
The word is designed by and created for illiterates. The dumbest who walk among us.
 
It doesn't matter who suggests we should abuse children we still should not, such irrevocable decisions should not be made for anyone before they have reached the age of majority regardless of who is proposing it, it is still child abuse.

I fully support reversible or impermanent gender affirming actions, I do not support chemical castration (especially this one as we find out that specifically for those going from male to female it suppresses the growth of genitalia making it too small to invaginate and making it impossible for their future enjoyment of sexual activities... in short, it makes it so they'll never orgasm... shame that), or early surgeries. Such irreversible actions taking away the choices they will have when they reach majority will always be child abuse.

Help them on their search, do not limit them in their options.


You are not as educated on the subject and science as the MAYO CLINIC



FUCKING LOSER



Man I wish the real Damo was still here
 
Back
Top