Why boycott Bud Light?

Why I care is first, men are not women and women are not men. They never will be. Telling people they can be screws up their heads and sadly people have mutilated their bodies over a lie. Next it's a destructive force against actual woman and imposing this stupidity on women's sports steals opportunities from actual woman. Freaks have walked around in dresses since time began And nobody cared. When yiu start demanding people accept it and demand they provide reasons why they don't accept it people will tell you to fuck off. Guess what jarod? Fuck off

Thank you you have posted a reason.

Who is demanding you accept it?
 
Thank you you have posted a reason.

Who is demanding you accept it?

I'll accept this as your apology for claiming I reject it out of hate. Too bad you aren't "man" to say it directly.

You are and your multiple threads about the same exact topic prove it.
 
Why I care is first, men are not women and women are not men.

I understand this is your belief, and that is your right to hold that belief... But why do you care if others have that belief? Why support economic harm upon any company who dares acknowledge that these people exist?

It seems you are demanding others believe as you do, or your are going to boycott them.
 
You are and your multiple threads about the same exact topic prove it.

No, I honestly do not care of you accept it or not. You are delusional. You imagine people demanding you accept something simply because they acknowledge that it exists.

I do not like plastic surgery, I dont accept it... However I am not out boycotting every company that has an ad with some woman with a boob job.
 
I understand this is your belief, and that is your right to hold that belief... But why do you care if others have that belief? Why support economic harm upon any company who dares acknowledge that these people exist?

It seems you are demanding others believe as you do, or your are going to boycott them.

Let me see if you will answer a question, why the fuck do you think you deserve an answer to any of your questions?

BTW I support economic harm on a business for the same reason queers wanted to economically harm a baker who didn't want to bake a queer cake.
 
It was a man speaking with the authority of Jesus (Matt 16:19; I Cor 10:7-11)…and by the inspiration of God. (II Tim 3:16).

As to Paul being an “ex-tax collector,” I can find no evidence for it. He was a Pharisee, he was well educated about the law of Moses, he could speak a couple of languages, at least, he was a Roman citizen…but I can’t say he was a tax-collector. More important to me, he was a Christians after his conversion (Acts 22:16) and was an apostle chosen by Christ himself (Acts 9).

2000 year old obscure stories cherry-picked by political/religious leaders 300 years later may not be very reliable. LOL

http://storiesoffaith.net/dramas/st-paul/
St Paul’s story of faith weaves his religious training by chief rabbi Gamaliel together with his tax collector days and with his conversion on the road to Damascus. His faith is tested during his preaching and church-founding days as he travels around the Mediterranean Sea.


Raised a devout Jew, Saul of Tarsus became a tax collector in the hinterlands of the Roman Empire. Especially hard on those who claimed to believe in Jesus, Saul was very successful. He is transformed by Jesus’ appearance on the road to Damascus. Giving up his first life, the new Paul preaches the teachings of Jesus to Jews and Gentiles throughtout the Mediterranean. His story of faithtells how he is trapped between Rome’s power and Jerusalem’s religion.He is the first to argue that God’s grace is a free gift, if it is accepted.
 
Next it's a destructive force against actual woman and imposing this stupidity on women's sports steals opportunities from actual woman.

I agree about the sports thing, and object to people born male participating in women's sports. Women's sports were created because of the innate reason that they are born with different capabilities. I do not believe it is a national emergency, or that it is happening much, but I would support any league that prohibits it.

Other than that, why is it a destructive force against people born women?
 
No, I honestly do not care of you accept it or not. You are delusional. You imagine people demanding you accept something simply because they acknowledge that it exists.

I do not like plastic surgery, I dont accept it... However I am not out boycotting every company that has an ad with some woman with a boob job.

Then if that's the. true stop asking these asinine questions. Bet you don't. Just like you maybe things are true simple because I think them. That's leftism

I don't give a shit what you don't boycott. Prople have a right to do it and if you don't like it, fuck you. Nobody cares
 
I'll accept this as your apology for claiming I reject it out of hate. Too bad you aren't "man" to say it directly.

You are and your multiple threads about the same exact topic prove it.

Who is demanding you accept it? I asked, never demanded, for you to explain it but not accept it. It took you a lot of tries and several days to come up with some viable reasons, but I finally got you to come up with something. Thank you!
 
I agree about the sports thing, and object to people born male participating in women's sports. Women's sports were created because of the innate reason that they are born with different capabilities. I do not believe it is a national emergency, or that it is happening much, but I would support any league that prohibits it.

Other than that, why is it a destructive force against people born women?

Why do you object to it?
 
Who is demanding you accept it? I asked, never demanded, for you to explain it but not accept it. It took you a lot of tries and several days to come up with some viable reasons, but I finally got you to come up with something. Thank you!

I answered yesterday so you're too stupid or youre just an a hole. I'll let you pick.
 
Like I indicated, I see nothing wrong with individuals boycotting. I see nothing wrong with a foul mouthed nut shooting up cases of Bud Light, (actually found several six packs of beer and used them for target practice. It’s quite fun, especially if using a 44 mag. :)) if he indeed did. I see those acts as part of our freedom of speech. But in no way should government be in the business of banning or preventing businesses from establishing themselves wherever they meet the physical requirements.

For instance, a homosexual couple could open a bakery in the town where I live. They should have every right to do it. It would fail as I can think of three people who would frequent the place. One is a right the owners have and the other is the right of the individuals to shape there or not. But government should stay out of it either way.

I got to bow out of the discussion for now. We’ve entered Nashville and it’s time for lunch. I’ve enjoyed posting more than normal as the wife drives us down the interstate. I drove yesterday.

Do you include lying as part of free speech? Deliberately lying as was revealed about both Tucker and Sean? I do not.

If Kid Rock was a Bud Light drinker and became upset about a trans ad for Bud Light, I can see why he would be upset.

OTOH, like the staged shooting of the beer, I strongly doubt Kid Rock drank Bud Light. It's worse than Rocky Mountain Horse Piss, light or right. Therefore, he's using deception to push hatred of others. IMO, that's very dishonest.
 
Freaks have walked around in dresses since time began And nobody cared. When yiu start demanding people accept it and demand they provide reasons why they don't accept it people will tell you to fuck off. Guess what jarod? Fuck off

Nobody is demanding anything of you, you snowflakes are always FEEL like someone is demanding you do something. Paranoia runs deep with you guys. Having a person in your ad campaign does not demand you support that person.
 
Nobody is demanding anything of you, you snowflakes are always FEEL like someone is demanding you do something. Paranoia runs deep with you guys. Having a person in your ad campaign does not demand you support that person.

Why do you care if bud light gets boycotted?
 
Let me see if you will answer a question, why the fuck do you think you deserve an answer to any of your questions?

BTW I support economic harm on a business for the same reason queers wanted to economically harm a baker who didn't want to bake a queer cake.

I do not "deserve" an answer, I simply asked for one, because I am curious and want to try to understand better where this outrage is coming from.

I never wanted economic harm on any baker.
 
I do not "deserve" an answer, I simply asked for one, because I am curious and want to try to understand better where this outrage is coming from.

I never wanted economic harm on any baker.

Of course your demanding. Days and days of your repetitive shit.

Sure as shit you did. You Veruca Salts don't like being told "No". Screw you spoiled children. Look how you behave. You get boycotted and you demand to know why. Because people don't want your shit anymore that's why. People are sick of you
 
Deviant behavior is that which goes against nature. It goes against the “natural use” of things.

Romans 1:27 — Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.

As to those other things you have listed, I am not competent to talk about them. I won’t go into every detail and try to detail everything that is wrong or deviant. For me, scripture is pretty plain about the subject at hand. Notice, I said, “for me.” Everybody doesn’t look at the world through the same lens.

I can see how you would believe that means homosexuality is against Gods will, but homosexuality is not the same thing as transexualism. I understand plenty of Transexuals are not attracted to people of the same birth sex, its a different thing.
 
Back
Top