PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
The difficult part of Braggs's case is showing his payoffs were designed to help his election chances.
uh sorry, that isn't what the NY statute requires.......it requires a felony.....name it.....
The difficult part of Braggs's case is showing his payoffs were designed to help his election chances.
Whether he did or not. it has no impact on Trump's crimes.
It has an impact on SmarterthanYou's credibility. Currently he has none.
Whataboutisms are one thing since they show you only have weak arguments. Making shit up to try to use whataboutisms shows you have gone down the rabbit hole.
RWers seem to be promoting the idea that if someone sues you and you publicly pay them then you are paying hush money.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-clinton-paid-850-000-hush-money/11513148002/
perhaps we don't require grand juries to be infallible, but what does it say about you that you are pinning your hopes for the 2024 election on one that admittedly wasn't?.......You do not require all the grand juries to be infallible. Did someone make that claim?" Who was it? Note, I said moved it toward likely. How is that infallibility?
how many haters here are going to blame trumpers on the jury, or a judge that trump bought?????
Yes, and what if he is convicted on 34 felonies?
What's the standard Republicans used?
Oh that's right, even though Bill and Hillary Clinton were never convicted of anything, they are still guilty of committing crimes.
don't get all butthurt just because I exposed your incessant desire for injustice. just simply accept that you don't give a flying fuck about the law and that the only thing that matters to you is using the law as a weapon against those you hate.
Listen you dumb motherfucker, at least us proper English grammar.
When I see you patrolling the board and haranguing the rightwingers who claim Bill and Hillary are guilty of crimes, I'll take the question you asked in the OP more seriously.
seriously?........but anyway, why do you keep pretending that is illegal?......
what about the fact its not against the law......
The fact that there is enough evidence to have a grand jury indict him, moves the probability that Trump has committed financial crimes to highly likely on the meter. They were weighing evidence for nearly 5 years.
Like Joe and Hunter and HillaryMy problem with many on JPP is they insist that if a person is not charged with a crime that person is innocent. That is total Bull shit. Look at Capone he committed many crimes including having people murdered but he was only convicted of tax evasion. Was he innocent of the crimes he wasn't charged with?
how many haters here are going to blame trumpers on the jury, or a judge that trump bought?????
If Trumpers on the jury vote against all the others, I will blame them.
Most.
War is coming. The Democrats will start it.
If trump is acquitted of all charges.......
so without seeing the evidence and hearing any testimony, you've already convicted him, correct?
how many haters here are going to blame trumpers on the jury, or a judge that trump bought?????