Transgender Democrat shoots up Christian school a hate crime.

[Taichiliberal]

Yet you still care. How sweet, TCL.

translation: our self described arrogant asshole can't sustain his gun flunky banter without looking totally foolish, so he's deteriorated to this lame retort.

That's it, dear readers. Dutch made a statement he couldn't prove or defend with facts or logic. But he's too much of an intellectual coward on this topic to admit such.

He's done. I'll leave him to his childish retorts and repeated dodges/lies/stall tactics.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

translation: our self described arrogant asshole can't sustain his gun flunky banter without looking totally foolish, so he's deteriorated to this lame retort.

That's it, dear readers. Dutch made a statement he couldn't prove or defend with facts or logic. But he's too much of an intellectual coward on this topic to admit such.

He's done. I'll leave him to his childish retorts and repeated dodges/lies/stall tactics.

Now maybe more members of JPP can see why they shouldn't trust the Far Left Bullies of JPP anymore than the Alt-Right ones.

 

[RB 60]

He does, and he likes knowing other people agree with him. It makes him feel safe but...I see signs he's waking up. I'm willing to give him time.

He's not waking up, he is comatose. He'll die in his state of fear and ignorance,

 

[Lightbringer]

He's not waking up, he is comatose. He'll die in his state of fear and ignorance,

That's your problem, you have no faith in your fellow man.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
You are SO full of it, Dutch. Your myopic version of reality is a joke...something you and your fellow gun flunkies impress each other with on the bar stools and at the shooting range.

Yes, handguns beat out assault rifles in the mass shooting dept. But are you really going to tell me that is justification for keeping the stats on AR-15 related deaths when those weapons need not be on the open market?
Here some examples of the reality:

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/26/11012...-mass-shooting

https://www.everytown.org/solutions/assault-weapons/


The OP has been thoroughly disproven.

YOU have yet to explain how Americans have or will be "punished" by the 1994 AWB or a reinstatement of it. The reading audience awaits (still).

And there it is. You just admitted they're not commonly used yet that's the focus of your wet dream ban. Why?

Are you drunk, high, tired or just really dense, Guillermo? Get an adult (or someone not in your circle jerk of compadres here) to explain that by this response YOU are saying that the number of people killed by AR-15 style weapons is acceptable, and therefor the 1994 AWB need not be re-enacted.



Yeah, it's not your family or friends getting wiped out, so your little mental comfort zone to beat out the libs is safe. Try reading some of the info in the links I provided (if you've got the guts). You and your kind disgust me.

 

[RB 60]

That's your problem, you have no faith in your fellow man.

No. not the delusional ones. Read their posts...

 

[Taichiliberal]

Guns Like The AR-15 Were Never Fully Banned

Read, and become learned.

"The review for the DOJ concluded that bans on specific models or features of assault weapons had little to no discernible impact on gun deaths. If the law had any effect, the report said, it was most likely the result of bans on large-capacity magazines, which contain 10 or more rounds. (Large magazines allow shooters to keep firing without pausing to reload, a point at which their targets could run or fight back.) Calculations based on homicide reports in Jersey City, New Jersey, suggested that restricting large-capacity magazines might lower the number of gunshot victims by up to 5 percent."

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/guns-like-the-ar-15-were-never-fully-banned/

Nice try, bunky. BUT that DOJ report (linked in your article) has a lot of "could be, might be, can be, possibly, potentially" in it that is rather shaky for the final declarative asserted. From the report;

Should it be renewed, the ban might reduce gunshot victimizations. This effect is
likely to be small at best and possibly too small for reliable measurement. A 5%
reduction in gunshot victimizations is perhaps a reasonable upper bound estimate of the
ban’s potential impact (based on the only available estimate of gunshot victimizations
resulting from attacks in which more than 10 shots were fired), but the actual impact is
likely to be smaller and may not be fully realized for many years into the future,
particularly if pre-ban LCMs continue to be imported into the U.S. from abroad. Just as
the restrictions imposed by the ban are modest – they are essentially limits on weapon
accessories like LCMs, flash hiders, threaded barrels, and the like – so too are the
potential benefits.118 In time, the ban may be seen as an effective prevention measure
that stopped further spread of weaponry considered to be particularly dangerous (in a
manner similar to federal restrictions on fully automatic weapons). But that conclusion
will be contingent on further research validating the dangers of AWs and LCM

Ask the family of the victims of mass shootings using assault rifles AR-15 style (that were on the 1994 list) if they're okay with being part of a "too small" percentage or the "no discernible impact" group that's not worth the reinstatement of the ban. I suggest you do so from a fast moving car.

 

[Lightbringer]

No. not the delusional ones. Read their posts...

I have. I see things you don't see in their posts.

 

[Lightbringer]

Are you drunk, high, tired or just really dense, Guillermo? Get an adult (or someone not in your circle jerk of compadres here) to explain that by this response YOU are saying that the number of people killed by AR-15 style weapons is acceptable, and therefor the 1994 AWB need not be re-enacted.



Yeah, it's not your family or friends getting wiped out, so your little mental comfort zone to beat out the libs is safe. Try reading some of the info in the links I provided (if you've got the guts). You and your kind disgust me.

Mad nuch?

 

[RB 60]

Nice try, bunky. BUT that DOJ report (linked in your article) has a lot of "could be, might be, can be, possibly, potentially" in it that is rather shaky for the final declarative asserted. From the report;

Should it be renewed, the ban might reduce gunshot victimizations. This effect is
likely to be small at best and possibly too small for reliable measurement. A 5%
reduction in gunshot victimizations is perhaps a reasonable upper bound estimate of the
ban’s potential impact (based on the only available estimate of gunshot victimizations
resulting from attacks in which more than 10 shots were fired), but the actual impact is
likely to be smaller and may not be fully realized for many years into the future,
particularly if pre-ban LCMs continue to be imported into the U.S. from abroad. Just as
the restrictions imposed by the ban are modest – they are essentially limits on weapon
accessories like LCMs, flash hiders, threaded barrels, and the like – so too are the
potential benefits.118 In time, the ban may be seen as an effective prevention measure
that stopped further spread of weaponry considered to be particularly dangerous (in a
manner similar to federal restrictions on fully automatic weapons). But that conclusion
will be contingent on further research validating the dangers of AWs and LCM

Ask the family of the victims of mass shootings using assault rifles AR-15 style (that were on the 1994 list) if they're okay with being part of a "too small" percentage or the "no discernible impact" group that's not worth the reinstatement of the ban. I suggest you do so from a fast moving car.

Damn, you are one illiterate fucktard. The AR was not completely banned, just with a combination of accessories. Those accessories weren't banned as stand alone additions to existing weapons.
No production AR-15 has a pistol grip, a bayonet lug, a folding stock or a grenade launcher.

From my above link;
"A 2004 report commissioned by the Department of Justice on the effects of the assault weapons ban concluded that the law was largely ineffective at limiting access to weapons with the power of the AR-15. According to the report, the ban focused on “features that have little to do with the weapons’ operation, and removing those features is sufficient to make the weapons legal.” The report noted that several semi-automatic rifles were functionally equivalent to the AR-15 and untouched by the ban."

 

[Taichiliberal]

^^^
Clear propensity for ignoring the posts of those with whom he disagrees.

While I'm against Trump and Trumpism, there's no fucking way I'm going to vote for a party that believes like TCL.

Still waiting for that explanation Dutch...and there is no post of yours that gives that explanation, so stop foolishly lying. Just buck up, be an adult and either explain your assertion or admit you can't. The reading audience awaits.

 

[Lightbringer]

Damn, you are one illiterate fucktard. The AR was not completely banned, just with a combination of accessories. Those accessories weren't banned as stand alone additions to existing weapons.
No AR-15 has a pistol grip, a bayonet lug, a folding stock or a grenade launcher.

From my above link;
"A 2004 report commissioned by the Department of Justice on the effects of the assault weapons ban concluded that the law was largely ineffective at limiting access to weapons with the power of the AR-15. According to the report, the ban focused on “features that have little to do with the weapons’ operation, and removing those features is sufficient to make the weapons legal.” The report noted that several semi-automatic rifles were functionally equivalent to the AR-15 and untouched by the ban."

Mine does.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Um, why don't you stop being an asshole and actually READ what others write before you respond? Go read the original list of banned weapons on the 1994 AWB list. Remember, all guns bought legally BEFORE the list went into legal effect were exempt. No gun shop/retailer could sell them afterwards until the sunset in 2004.

And yes, genius.....the advertising worked because THE WEAPONS WORKED EXACTLY AS ADVERTISED. Which is why not only were they popular among "regular" gun enthusiast (great sales after 2004), but a favorite among the mass shooters (sad to say). Capice'? If so, maybe you can pick up the gauntlet for Dutch and tell the reading audience how the American public was "punished" when the ban was in place, and how would they be punished if enacted again?

That's actually true. The point of owning an AR is to kill people, specifically feds who overstep their bounds.

You have no guile, Guillermo...you just bray like a MAGA troll when faced with a reality you can't BS past.

 

[Lightbringer]

You have no guile, Guillermo...you just bray like a MAGA troll when faced with a reality you can't BS past.

Why are you complaining? I agree with you that the point of owning these weapons is to kill human beings. Why are you upset by that? That's the point you were making.

 

[RB 60]

Mine does.

I added "production" AR-15. would assume you added those accessories.

 

[Lightbringer]

I added "production" AR-15. would assume you added those accessories.

...maybe....

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Why don't you stop being an asshole/liar, Guillermo? I supply links when needed....I've done so on this particular thread, as the chronology of the posts shows. You're just an insipidly stubborn and willfully ignorant MAGA mook with occasional bouts of troll-ism.

The thing is when taken to task, you gun flunkies can't logically or factually back up a lot of your contentions....you just bluff and bluster and try to detour the discussion. You fail. So either provide some valid proof of what you say or continue to blow smoke in anger instead of just conceding a point. Coward.

And you didn't supply a link. Why not? You can't?

This is a printed medium, you delirious dunce. That's why the chronology of the posts makes your repeated lies or the more pathetic. Posts #328,331, 360 & 440. Now, dance like a MAGA monkey to another claim while never having the guts to admit error that stares you in the face. Coward.

The OP was disproven. Your picking up the gauntlet for Dutch's unproven assertion fails. But do tell the guy you see in the mirror of your victory, then circle jerk with your compadres. I'll just sit back and laugh.

 

[Lightbringer]

This is a printed medium, you delirious dunce. That's why the chronology of the posts makes your repeated lies or the more pathetic. Posts #328,331, 360 & 440. Now, dance like a MAGA monkey to another claim while never having the guts to admit error that stares you in the face.

The OP was disproven. Your picking up the gauntlet for Dutch's unproven assertion fails. But do tell the guy you see in the mirror of your victory, then circle jerk with your compadres. I'll just sit back and laugh.

No. That's not the latest post to quote. Go quote my last post and respond to that.

 

[RB 60]

Why are you complaining? I agree with you that the point of owning these weapons is to kill human beings. Why are you upset by that? That's the point you were making.

The point of owning these weapons is for sport and competition shooting, not to kill human beings.
It's why I bought my M-1s from the Army and the M1-A from a friend. I didn't but them to kill people.

 

[Lightbringer]

The point of owning these weapons is for sport and competition shooting, not to kill human beings.
It's why I bought my M-1s from the Army and the M1-A from a friend. I didn't but them to kill people.

Bullshit, the point of owning these weapons is to kill human beings who want to establish tyranny. An AR ain't for duck hunting...it's for killing cops and feds.