Congressional oversight over State Prosecutors?

And Big Foot was spotted last week, Elvis was seen hanging out in Idaho, and Sandy Hook never occurred

Elvis is not here in Idaho. In the late 70s, I attended a class instructed by a Tennessee toxicologist who claimed he had Elvis’s brains in a jar in his office.
 
You’ve said it was purely political without seeing the charges or evidence…. So basically you have announced you will say he is innocent no matter what…

AKA - Above the law.

Thats an assumption which you are free to make but it makes you sound irrational. Charges are not proof of guilt. I told you that the same claims can be me ued against you. You have already concluded trump is guilty and nothing will dissuade you. I'm merely saying you're politically motivated and you bristle at the claim. I don't blame you but that doesnt mean I'm wrong.
 
Thats an assumption which you are free to make but it makes you sound irrational. Charges are not proof of guilt. I told you that the same claims can be me ued against you. You have already concluded trump is guilty and nothing will dissuade you. I'm merely saying you're politically motivated and you bristle at the claim. I don't blame you but that doesnt mean I'm wrong.

Where did I say he was guilty? I have purposely not said that because I do not know. I do not know what he’s been charged with.

You on the other hand, I basically said the charges are bullshit, before you even know what they are, because it’s Trump. The only conclusion is that you believe Trump is above the law.
 
I understand. You’re one of the more pro-Trump partisans on this forum, so I get yi our take on things. Nothing that I say is going to change your mind.

And, make no mistake about it, I have testified before grand juries and I know how one-sided they can be. No fan of them. But, that’s the system we have, like it or not.

Now, a whole new set of players become involved. Not a grand jury, but a criminal one, if it goes as far as a trial. If that jury reaches a verdict, one way or another, will you still consider it a political stunt?

You first have to show with evidence that Im "...one of the more pro-Tump partisans..." here and until you do it's your more than welcome to your opinion. Don't confuse it with facts.

Oh I know and that's precisely my point. It can be used for justice or revenge just like a hammer can be used to build or destroy.

I could and I might but gaining a conviction doesnt mean it wasnt initiated for political gain. You guys are masters at conflating ideas. If you get a conviction I'd be quite content that you got what you were after but that doesn't eliminate it's political benefits.
 
You first have to show with evidence that Im "...one of the more pro-Tump partisans..." here and until you do it's your more than welcome to your opinion. Don't confuse it with facts.

Oh I know and that's precisely my point. It can be used for justice or revenge just like a hammer can be used to build or destroy.

I could and I might but gaining a conviction doesnt mean it wasnt initiated for political gain. You guys are masters at conflating ideas. If you get a conviction I'd be quite content that you got what you were after but that doesn't eliminate it's political benefits.

What you are saying, handjob, is that we could never, under any conditions, indict Donald Trump cause it would always be political.
 
Where did I say he was guilty? I have purposely not said that because I do not know. I do not know what he’s been charged with.

You on the other hand, I basically said the charges are bullshit, before you even know what they are, because it’s Trump. The only conclusion is that you believe Trump is above the law.

Where did I say the charges were bullshit? We can do this all day. Again you jump to wild confusions and when I do it to you you don't seem to like it very much. This is why we have the problems we have on this site.
 
I've never heard a liberal on this board call for congressional committees to investigate municipal city prosecutors, but you're welcome to find the post where they do

Yer kidding, right?

Rodney King, - leftists DEMANDED that federal prosecutors investigate and override the jury and the prosecutors. There are DOZENS of cases where democrats have gone after local prosecutors.

The issue is that for you Nazis, all history started 5 minutes ago, and nothing prior to that time is considered.
 
What you are saying, handjob, is that we could never, under any conditions, indict Donald Trump cause it would always be political.

That's not what I said at all. Calling me "handjob" when Ive gone out of my way to be respectful and not insult you shows us exactly who you are.
 
Where did I say the charges were bullshit? We can do this all day. Again you jump to wild confusions and when I do it to you you don't seem to like it very much. This is why we have the problems we have on this site.

Ok, do you believe this case against trump is purely political?
Do you believe this case against trump is bullshit?
 
You first have to show with evidence that Im "...one of the more pro-Tump partisans..." here and until you do it's your more than welcome to your opinion. Don't confuse it with facts.

Oh I know and that's precisely my point. It can be used for justice or revenge just like a hammer can be used to build or destroy.

I could and I might but gaining a conviction doesnt mean it wasnt initiated for political gain. You guys are masters at conflating ideas. If you get a conviction I'd be quite content that you got what you were after but that doesn't eliminate it's political benefits.

Lordy, Yak, I’ve read your posts for a long time to observe your positions.

Gaining a conviction means only one thing. That a person was guilty of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Period. Nothing more. Nothing less.

You and others can argue all you wish about the political benefits or detriments of any finding of guilty or not guilty. I grow weary of all of that.
 
Yer kidding, right?

Rodney King, - leftists DEMANDED that federal prosecutors investigate and override the jury and the prosecutors. There are DOZENS of cases where democrats have gone after local prosecutors.

The issue is that for you Nazis, all history started 5 minutes ago, and nothing prior to that time is considered.

How many have they wanted investigated for civil rights violations? The left will say whatever is politically expedient ni matter hos much it contradicts this theyve said in the past or what they will say in the future.
 
That's not what I said at all. Calling me "handjob" when Ive gone out of my way to be respectful and not insult you shows us exactly who you are.

As usual, my dear, you are changing the subject. In your world its fine to send Trump underlings to jail, but never Trump cause it would be "political".
 
Ok, do you believe this case against trump is purely political?
Do you believe this case against trump is bullshit?

I don't believe I ever used the word, purely. If I did that's an error but youd have to show where I said it. I said it's a political stunt.

I don't know if it is.
 
I don't believe I ever used the word, purely. If I did that's an error but youd have to show where I said it. I said it's a political stunt.

I don't know if it is.

Ok, glad to hear you do not know if it’s pure politics or bullshit. You just went up one point in my scale.
 
As the Nazi democrats continue to shit all over the Constitution and abuse prosecutorial powers to attack the presidential opponent of Joe Biden and the democrat Reich, the popularity of President Trump is soaring. As the nation rallies around the former president while the fascists once again pursue a bogus witch hunt in their effort to corrupt the presidential election of 2024 and destroy our democracy, the public is flocking to support Trump against this petty, 3rd world corruption.

It makes me wonder if the Soros scum are getting the result they wanted, that they fear Ron DeSantis more than Trump and know that the malicious prosecution by crooked Soros prosecutors would ensure Trump is the nominee?

democrats are always seeking ways to corrupt and tamper with our elections - this may be yet another scheme by the fascists.
 
Last edited:
Lordy, Yak, I’ve read your posts for a long time to observe your positions.

Gaining a conviction means only one thing. That a person was guilty of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Period. Nothing more. Nothing less.

You and others can argue all you wish about the political benefits or detriments of any finding of guilty or not guilty. I grow weary of all of that.

So you can't show evidence for the claim. That's fine. I just want it known between you and me that it's your opinion and nothing more.

I agree like those people who are found guilty of murder but after 45 years in prison they are released because of DNA? Maybe how you define "reasonable" matters.

Your easing of intellectual vigor bears you out.
 
Ok, glad to hear you do not know if it’s pure politics or bullshit. You just went up one point in my scale.

You're doing again. Those arent the same thing. Did you read your questions? I don't really give a shit about your scale. Sorry.
 
Back
Top