I did not say that. I said if you cut taxes, I get to keep more of my money. nice try liar
savings are down because the rate (incentive) to save is down. and the incentive to spend is up
Lowest unemployment since the moon landing.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
I did not say that. I said if you cut taxes, I get to keep more of my money. nice try liar
savings are down because the rate (incentive) to save is down. and the incentive to spend is up
You believe that cutting taxes "lets people keep more of what they earned" because you are a caveman who is only capable of that level of simplistic thought.
Because the reality is that cutting taxes decreases personal savings, and we have 50 years of data that shows that.
You don't want to deal with that, which is why you're trying to change the subject and not defend anything you say here.
Typical loser behavior.
yes, I think cutting the tax rate allows me to keep more of what I earned
No, it's because you're an asshole who doesn't want to concede any point on the internet because you correctly understand that by tearing down a small part of your conventional wisdom, I can come for the rest pretty easily.
You are always within the margin of error because you make so many errors here all the time.
That is saying the same thing.
So if you're not saving the money from a tax cut, then why did you say all that shit about personal savings?
What incentive? What are you fucking talking about? This is incoherent jibberish.
What incentive? What is going on in that head of yours? Nothing you are saying is making any sense.
It sounds like you don't want to admit that cutting taxes reduces savings because you think your conventional wisdom is the true answer...but it's not because of the data.
You don't want to deal with that data because if you did, you couldn't make the same argument anymore.
But the data says otherwise.
So the conflict is your feelings vs. empirical data.
Which one of those is real and measurable?
No, it's like you opening your big, fat, stupid mouth and putting your tiny, size 3 foot into it.
You claimed that tax cuts "let you keep more of what you earned", except all the data says the opposite.
Every single post of yours that doesn't address that dissonance is your way of cowardly escaping the debate.
wrong.
allowing people to take home more pay does not mean they will save it. not when you idiots have interest rates lower than inflation rates.
No, again, you're a fucking moron who doesn't know things.
So if you're not saving by "letting you keep more of what you earned", then what are you doing and what do you mean?
I demolished you in this debate
every claim you made was bullshit. Allowing me to keep more of my money gives me more of my money. Education spending has skyrocketed. and on and on and on
every lie you claimed was dealt with
So then they will spend it, which is what you got all upset about earlier.
It doesn't seem like you've given this much thought at all.
So if "letting people keep more of what they earned" doesn't mean saving it, then that means you believe it will trickle down.
Has it ever?
we as a society are spending it you fucking dumb ass
5% of the population using 50% of resources. I've mentioned that dozens of times. We are not saving we are spending. Even though you idiots are fearful of the environment and what we are doing to it, you refuse to allow us to consume less and spend less.
you put us on a path of unsustainability.
higher.
Because people should be incentivized to save and be responsible for themselves.
You demolished yourself by completely backtracking your tax cut theory.
So it used to be all about personal savings, but then you qualified it by saying "not everyone is going to save".
So then why would you want to cut taxes since doing so has produced lower savings rates?
Is it because you're fucking stupid? I think so.