Biden discovery wont bail Trump out

archives said:
It doesn’t make a difference, legally, the two are apples and oranges, largely centered upon intent, plus in Trump’s case, obstruction.
Click to expand...
What obstruction?????!?
archives said:
But legalities, the facts, isn’t what plays in the media market, the right’s intent is to distort and exaggerate the truth as much as they can inorder to portray Biden as Attila the Hun. The little Jimmy Jordans in the House will be competing against each other to see who can generate the most headlines on Fox. It’s a rerun of their 2015 strategy.
Click to expand...
You can call Biden's mishandling of government documents anything you want. It's still intentionally mishandling of government documents.
 
floridafan said:
He was unaware and returned them immediately. Trump knew he had them, and refused to return them.
Click to expand...

So you claiming Biden's dementia again as a defense. Gotit.
Trump had documents that government helped him move, and approved the storage area they were stored in. He didn't need to return them.
 
ExpressLane said:
Yes after SIX YEARS after Biden stole them and it was discovered Biden returned the stolen documents. If someone disovered a bank robber had 100K hidden away that he stole six years before so he then decided to return it. It would be no harm no foul right? :seenoevil::seenoevil:


Trump was in negations with the National archive as to what he could legally retain.


That is a lie.



It even more funny you Libratards are trying to say the two situation are "different". :rofl2:
Click to expand...

0zESprh.jpg
 
This is funny.

Today, 04:56 PM
Into the Night
Verified Loser

This message is hidden because Into the Night is on your ignore list.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
0zES prh.jpg
Click to expand...
Stupid meme. Biden took documents that did not belong to him and kept them in multiple nonsecure places for six years and got exposed then decided to return them to their owner the National Archive. He violated federal law and Garland put a prosecutor on his wrinkle old ass.
 
floridafan said:
The discovery of additional government documents at President Joe Biden's home on Saturday, dating back to when he was vice president under President Barrack Obama, should not have any impact on special counsel Jack Smith's investigation into Donald Trump's hoarding documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort.

That's according to a former U.S. attorney who did admit it will be perceived as a "political" problem -- but that has nothing to do with following the letter of the law.

As the Guardian's David Smith wrote, the Biden document recovery is creating a firestorm that Trump and his allies are using to protest his own legal problems as the DOJ-appointed Smith investigates possible charges of government obstruction and violations of the Espionage Act.

"Despite superficial similarities, the two cases are like chalk and cheese. In January last year the National Archives retrieved 15 boxes of documents from Trump’s home, telling justice department officials they contained 'a lot' of classified material," Smith wrote before adding, "The Biden papers are far less voluminous. First it emerged that a 'small number' with classified markings had been found in November in a locked closet at the Penn Biden Center think tank in Washington."
Click to expand...
You forgot to post the link.
I read this earlier so here it is, with the title:

There’s one winner in the Biden documents discovery: Donald Trump
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jan/14/biden-documents-discovery-donald-trump-winner


lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top