Biden discovery wont bail Trump out

floridafan

Verified User
The discovery of additional government documents at President Joe Biden's home on Saturday, dating back to when he was vice president under President Barrack Obama, should not have any impact on special counsel Jack Smith's investigation into Donald Trump's hoarding documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort.

That's according to a former U.S. attorney who did admit it will be perceived as a "political" problem -- but that has nothing to do with following the letter of the law.

As the Guardian's David Smith wrote, the Biden document recovery is creating a firestorm that Trump and his allies are using to protest his own legal problems as the DOJ-appointed Smith investigates possible charges of government obstruction and violations of the Espionage Act.

"Despite superficial similarities, the two cases are like chalk and cheese. In January last year the National Archives retrieved 15 boxes of documents from Trump’s home, telling justice department officials they contained 'a lot' of classified material," Smith wrote before adding, "The Biden papers are far less voluminous. First it emerged that a 'small number' with classified markings had been found in November in a locked closet at the Penn Biden Center think tank in Washington."
 
The discovery of additional government documents at President Joe Biden's home on Saturday, dating back to when he was vice president under President Barrack Obama, should not have any impact on special counsel Jack Smith's investigation into Donald Trump's hoarding documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort.

That's according to a former U.S. attorney who did admit it will be perceived as a "political" problem -- but that has nothing to do with following the letter of the law.

As the Guardian's David Smith wrote, the Biden document recovery is creating a firestorm that Trump and his allies are using to protest his own legal problems as the DOJ-appointed Smith investigates possible charges of government obstruction and violations of the Espionage Act.

"Despite superficial similarities, the two cases are like chalk and cheese. In January last year the National Archives retrieved 15 boxes of documents from Trump’s home, telling justice department officials they contained 'a lot' of classified material," Smith wrote before adding, "The Biden papers are far less voluminous. First it emerged that a 'small number' with classified markings had been found in November in a locked closet at the Penn Biden Center think tank in Washington."

The two situations are night and day. The bottom line is:

1. Biden returned the docs right away once they were disocovered.
2. Twump lied about having them, then after two years of the archives begging for them back the FBI had to go get them.
3. twump said he "could declassify docs telepathically" and when that didn't work he claimed the FBI planted them inciting MAGA nutbags to attack the FBI.

It's funny but not suprising that the MAGAs are trying to make hay out of this to attack Biden.
 
The two situations are night and day. The bottom line is:

1. Biden returned the docs right away once they were disocovered.
Yes after SIX YEARS after Biden stole them and it was discovered Biden returned the stolen documents. If someone disovered a bank robber had 100K hidden away that he stole six years before so he then decided to return it. It would be no harm no foul right? :seenoevil::seenoevil:


2. Twump lied about having them, then after two years of the archives begging for them back the FBI had to go get them.
Trump was in negations with the National archive as to what he could legally retain.


3. twump said he "could declassify docs telepathically" and when that didn't work he claimed the FBI planted them inciting MAGA nutbags to attack the FBI.
That is a lie.

It's funny but not suprising that the MAGAs are trying to make hay out of this to attack Biden.

It even more funny you Libratards are trying to say the two situation are "different". :rofl2:
 
Yes after SIX YEARS after Biden stole them and it was discovered Biden returned the stolen documents. If someone disovered a bank robber had 100K hidden away that he stole six years before so he then decided to return it. It would be no harm no foul right? :seenoevil::seenoevil:


Trump was in negations with the National archive as to what he could legally retain.


That is a lie.



It even more funny you Libratards are trying to say the two situation are "different". :rofl2:

I will wait for you to post evidence that Biden knew the documents were missing and purposefully kept them. It's a fact that trump took this documents without any intention of returning any of them. Afterall, they were his personal docs!
 
What Biden did after after the documents were found is irrelevant.

He had national security documents in an insecure location/locations.

That is a crime.
 
What Biden did after after the documents were found is irrelevant.

He had national security documents in an insecure location/locations.

That is a crime.
Then it is also a crime that trump had his documents in an insecure location- right?
 
I will wait for you to post evidence that Biden knew the documents were missing and purposefully kept them. It's a fact that trump took this documents without any intention of returning any of them. Afterall, they were his personal docs!

Biden has repeatedly told us that he takes Classified documents very seriously. That means he knew exactly what he was doing removing those documents from the White House. He knew it was a serious offense but chose to do it anyway.
 
Biden has repeatedly told us that he takes Classified documents very seriously. That means he knew exactly what he was doing removing those documents from the White House. He knew it was a serious offense but chose to do it anyway.

You cant even prove that Biden himself removed those doc from the WH, however is it beyond proof that trump admitted stealing them and refusing to return them.
 
Yes after SIX YEARS after Biden stole them and it was discovered Biden returned the stolen documents. If someone disovered a bank robber had 100K hidden away that he stole six years before so he then decided to return it. It would be no harm no foul right? :seenoevil::seenoevil:


Trump was in negations with the National archive as to what he could legally retain.


That is a lie.



It even more funny you Libratards are trying to say the two situation are "different". :rofl2:

Everything I posted is fact. I have the truth on my side. You got zero.
 
The discovery of additional government documents at President Joe Biden's home on Saturday, dating back to when he was vice president under President Barrack Obama, should not have any impact on special counsel Jack Smith's investigation into Donald Trump's hoarding documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort.

That's according to a former U.S. attorney who did admit it will be perceived as a "political" problem -- but that has nothing to do with following the letter of the law.

As the Guardian's David Smith wrote, the Biden document recovery is creating a firestorm that Trump and his allies are using to protest his own legal problems as the DOJ-appointed Smith investigates possible charges of government obstruction and violations of the Espionage Act.

"Despite superficial similarities, the two cases are like chalk and cheese. In January last year the National Archives retrieved 15 boxes of documents from Trump’s home, telling justice department officials they contained 'a lot' of classified material," Smith wrote before adding, "The Biden papers are far less voluminous. First it emerged that a 'small number' with classified markings had been found in November in a locked closet at the Penn Biden Center think tank in Washington."

I hope these document found at Biden's former office and home does not jeopardize the case against Trump?!!
6a00d8341bf80c53ef02af148cb7d7200c-500wi
 
Everything I posted is fact. I have the truth on my side. You got zero.

Oh really? How about a quote from Trump where he said exactly that.

3. twump said he "could declassify docs telepathically" and when that didn't work he claimed the FBI planted them inciting MAGA nutbags to attack the FBI.



BTW Biden only returned the stolen documents when he got caught with them.
 
Oh really? How about a quote from Trump where he said exactly that.





BTW Biden only returned the stolen documents when he got caught with them.

Thats a lie my dear. No one caught Biden, they were found by accident and returned. If Trump had done the same, he wouldn't be under criminal investigation today.
 
Thats a lie my dear. No one caught Biden, they were found by accident and returned. If Trump had done the same, he wouldn't be under criminal investigation today.
Oh your are saying that the fact that Biden suppressed the fact that he stole the docs for 6 years . And then they were "discovered" by $1200 lawyers moonlighting as movers. Then he suppressed admitting it for two months means he is innocent. I have a nice bridge I want to sell you.


I mean Biden DID SAY he didn't know anything about these documents. But Biden also DID say he gave his dead uncle a Purple heart and his dead uncle rejected it. And Biden did say he never spoke with Hunter about his business deals but he did have Hunter's business partner visit him or his aides 19 times in the White House. So yeah you can trust his word.:laugh:
 
You cant even prove that Biden himself removed those doc from the WH, however is it beyond proof that trump admitted stealing them and refusing to return them.
Biden said he took Classified document VERY SERIOUSLY so he obviously knew what he was doing when he moved the documents to his office and his garage and to his home. :thinking:
 
Oh your are saying that the fact that Biden suppressed the fact that he stole the docs for 6 years . And then they were "discovered" by $1200 lawyers moonlighting as movers. Then he suppressed admitting it for two months means he is innocent. I have a nice bridge I want to sell you.


I mean Biden DID SAY he didn't know anything about these documents. But Biden also DID say he gave his dead uncle a Purple heart and his dead uncle rejected it. And Biden did say he never spoke with Hunter about his business deals but he did have Hunter's business partner visit him or his aides 19 times in the White House. So yeah you can trust his word.:laugh:

The documents were returned immediately, not 2 months later. Prove to us that Biden even knew anything about them.
 
Biden said he took Classified document VERY SERIOUSLY so he obviously knew what he was doing when he moved the documents to his office and his garage and to his home. :thinking:

Prove that he knew anything about them- you cant sweetie. All you got is your normal daily bullshit.
 
Back
Top