“We should elect the president the way we elect governors, senators, mayors, represen

They don't cut any current funding. They only cut proposed increases; if the budget is set to increase item X by 7%, they only increase it by 5%.

They never talked about killing Social Security. One senator suggested placing it under sunset laws. That means it comes up for renewal every x number of years. They always renew the programs and no Republican is going to vote not to renew SS.

Because the voters would revolt

Their money masters really want them to though
 
Because the voters would revolt

Their money masters really want them to though

Of course they would. That is why nobody is going to end SS. It is not in the interest of anybody to abolish it--even the "money masters". They would lose the most.

We do have to make changes in it because by about 2037 revenues will only cover about 70% of benefits--due primarily to the decline in the birth rate (not because anybody "borrowed" the money).
 
Of course they would. That is why nobody is going to end SS. It is not in the interest of anybody to abolish it--even the "money masters". They would lose the most.

We do have to make changes in it because by about 2037 revenues will only cover about 70% of benefits--due primarily to the decline in the birth rate (not because anybody "borrowed" the money).



It is a very Efficient way to protect the elderly and challenged people


That money gets spent right back into the economy

Creating more tax revenue
 
There is not a single program that helps the poor and disadvantaged that was not due to Dems and was opposed by the Reds. The Dems are the ones who pass legislation for them. You are right-wing wrong.

The Democrats don't help the poor and disadvantaged. They cause them.
 
The poor still get all that free stuff even when Republicans are in power. They never bother to change any of it, they just increase the funding.

The rich get the free stuff. They just tell you the poor are taking your money, while they live like kings. Poor work hard for survival wages.
 
The rich get the free stuff. They just tell you the poor are taking your money, while they live like kings. Poor work hard for survival wages.

What free stuff do thee wealthy get?

The poor don't get any government benefits?

Pitting rich against poor is just partisan politics to generate hate of one side so you vote for the other.
 
It is not supposed to result in an amendment; the purpose is to change the operation without having to amend the Constitution.

The constitution is quite clear about election responsibility. It is reserved for the States. Any attempts to override state laws would be a violation and, therefore, require an amendment to change.

The states have the power to determine how their electors are chosen, so how can it be unconstitutional?

Now your being obtuse and dishonest. This is about the Congress usurping States rights.

I don't think it is a good idea and probably will never go into effect.

Again, it's a moronic idea and will only fail because we have a constitution that prevents the Federal Government from interceding.
 
The poor still get all that free stuff even when Republicans are in power.

That's because it is the law. Be more honest, if that is even possible.

They never bother to change any of it, they just increase the funding.

They being the Democrats right? Of course, intelligent people know that once free stuff starts getting handed out, it is nearly impossible to take it away without severe election consequences.

That's why Nancy Pelosi passed Obamacare without knowing what was in the bill. Dishonest hacks in the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses knew that once passed, it would be nearly impossible to rescind no matter the budget consequences and inconsistencies and failures it contained.
 
They never talked about killing Social Security. One senator suggested placing it under sunset laws. That means it comes up for renewal every x number of years. They always renew the programs and no Republican is going to vote not to renew SS.

So, the media, Biden and the Democrats were lying again? True.

Biden: Republicans Want to Get Rid of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid
https://www.cnsnews.com/article/was...ant-get-rid-social-security-medicare-medicaid

Republicans plan to axe Medicare, Social Security, Biden warns in Florida days before midterm
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...ns-in-florida-days-before-midterm/ar-AA13EAwr
 
The constitution is quite clear about election responsibility. It is reserved for the States. Any attempts to override state laws would be a violation and, therefore, require an amendment to change.

Now your being obtuse and dishonest. This is about the Congress usurping States rights.

Again, it's a moronic idea and will only fail because we have a constitution that prevents the Federal Government from interceding.

You don't understand the concept. Congress has nothing to do with it--it is a pact between states. The state law regarding electors would require electors to vote for the national popular vote winner. That is all within the constitutional power of state government.

It would take effect when states with 270 or more electoral votes join the pact. The result would be the national popular vote winner would receive a majority of the electoral votes. It is supported by those who want the president chosen by popular vote but know they don't have the votes to adopt an amendment.
 
That's because it is the law. Be more honest, if that is even possible.

Of course it is the law. Everybody knows government programs are passed by Congress. You are stating the obvious.

They being the Democrats right? Of course, intelligent people know that once free stuff starts getting handed out, it is nearly impossible to take it away without severe election consequences.

That's why Nancy Pelosi passed Obamacare without knowing what was in the bill. Dishonest hacks in the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses knew that once passed, it would be nearly impossible to rescind no matter the budget consequences and inconsistencies and failures it contained.[/QUOTE]

No. The Democrats favor those programs. The point was that even when Republican control the White House and Congress (2017-2019, for example) they do nothing to change the laws doling out money; , as a matter of fact, they increase it. So, if a person opposes that spending they accomplish nothing by replacing Democrats with Republicans.

Trump wanted a $2,000 stimulus check rather than the $600 Congress voted for. He said he would have won Georgia with that $2,000.

Obamacare was not unusual. No member of Congress has time to read any bill before it passes.
 
So, the media, Biden and the Democrats were lying again? True.

Biden and the Democrats. The media did not lie, it reported what Biden said and it reported what the Republican said who proposed the sunsetting.

You know both sides lie by putting out scare-mongering claims about the other. Republicans claimed Obamacare had a death commission for old folks, told us Mexico was paying for the wall, and that there was no violence on January 6. The media was not lying, there were printing what the Democrats and Republicans said. That is their job.
 
Unfortunately, class envy is how Democrats remain in power. By fear mongering the American sheeple. ;)

Yes, they recognize the hate put out by many Republicans and they repeat the same behavior they claim to dislike. The think it is ok to spew hate if they are attacking somebody worse.
 
Ah, but the refugees to whom you refer as illegal aliens are not representing the governments that they're fleeing.
Again, no treason applies.

One mustn't engaged in a battle of wits while unarmed.
I'm very sorry that they did away with the Saturday morning cartoons, thus depriving your mind from grasping something it understands.

I guess you need to be on "ignore" for a while.

Allowing illegal aliens to vote in elections is a crime, traitor
 
Back
Top