Warnock won't answer

ExpressLane said:
Absolutely. But the difference is we don't reject God like many here do. Thank God for grace.
Click to expand...

A typo on my part. You are not among them as proved in your actions. You reject God daily by spreading hate and lies, "doc".

The fact you claim to speak for Stone is among your many lies, dumbass. Worse is your claim to speak for God in claiming who rejects what.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I'd think you'd cheer his Progressive approach to things... But I guess all that matters is which party he's in to you...
Click to expand...

I guarantee you he doesnt know what that word means or how to even spell it. Yet again you hate abortion of any kind, except of course when your candidate forces his women into it. Then you look the other way.
 
BartenderElite said:
I had a lot of debates w/ righties about the Iraq War at the time. Any one of them would have laughed hysterically if I told them conservatives would be trying to give Dems "credit" for the Iraq War 20 years later.
Click to expand...

No one in their right mind gave them credit for it. It was their down on their knees immediately cowardice that let it happen. Just to clear things up.
 
Theywillneverlearn! said:
No one in their right mind gave them credit for it. It was their down on their knees immediately cowardice that let it happen. Just to clear things up.
Click to expand...

Interesting take. I thought it was the barrage of Republican lies that we've all gotten so used to at this point that let it happen.

Besides the point, though. It wasn't a Christian war.
 
BartenderElite said:
Interesting take. I thought it was the barrage of Republican lies that we've all gotten so used to at this point that let it happen.

Besides the point, though. It wasn't a Christian war.
Click to expand...

democrats were all in for it. No denying that. They had a chance to stop it cold. They knew they were going make good blood money out of it. And still do.
 
floridafan said:
Yet again you hate abortion of any kind, except of course when your candidate forces his women into it. Then you look the other way.
Click to expand...

I think abortion is a decision that two people have to make. I don't have a problem with it being on demand for say the first trimester of a pregnancy and for valid medical reasons (eg., rare) afterwards.

I don't think it's a "woman's right to choose" unless you abolish child support being paid by men. After all, it takes two to tango and therefore this is very much in the vein of contract law. One side in that contract doesn't hold all the rights to what happens.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I think abortion is a decision that two people have to make. I don't have a problem with it being on demand for say the first trimester of a pregnancy and for valid medical reasons (eg., rare) afterwards.

I don't think it's a "woman's right to choose" unless you abolish child support being paid by men. After all, it takes two to tango and therefore this is very much in the vein of contract law. One side in that contract doesn't hold all the rights to what happens.
Click to expand...

I don't agree w/ that logic. We're talking about a woman's right to decide what to do w/ her own body. We really don't have a more sacred right than that.

Men don't have to carry a fetus to term. That's exclusively w/ the woman.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I think abortion is a decision that two people have to make. I don't have a problem with it being on demand for say the first trimester of a pregnancy and for valid medical reasons (eg., rare) afterwards.

I don't think it's a "woman's right to choose" unless you abolish child support being paid by men. After all, it takes two to tango and therefore this is very much in the vein of contract law. One side in that contract doesn't hold all the rights to what happens.
Click to expand...

I disagree on giving rapists and pedophile "fathers" the right to have a 50% say in an abortion. If the couple is married, then, yes, I think the husband should have a say in it.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Isn't Warnock some sort of ordained minister? What's his church say about abortion?

As a Baptist minister, you'd think his position would be reflected by his denomination's religious beliefs that abortion is wrong in all cases--the position generally held by the Baptist Church in the US in general. Of course, that position is completely incompatible with being a Democrat so you get crickets when it comes up from a money grubbing political hack like Warnock.
Click to expand...
Christianity teaches you to be responsible for your own sin, Christianity teaches to judge not, and the concept of free will, that is why a minister can hold the idea that religious concepts should not infringe upon other’s rights. Sen. Warnock can be like other Christian Congress people and separate their Church from the State.
 
martin said:
Instead choose a guy who financed a couple of them.
Click to expand...

And he's a werewolf to boot.

No serious person would EVER vote for Herschel Walker. He is a liar, mentally disturbed, and a woman beater. Great candidates you support there, fake doc
 
Phantasmal said:
Christianity teaches you to be responsible for your own sin, Christianity teaches to judge not, and the concept of free will, that is why a minister can hold the idea that religious concepts should not infringe upon other’s rights. Sen. Warnock can be like other Christian Congress people and separate their Church from the State.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Let God judge, not people who think they know better.

Notice that most of the anti-abortionists on JPP are also White Nationalists who favor keeping white males on top and everyone else one or more rungs down the ladder.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Isn't Warnock some sort of ordained minister? What's his church say about abortion?

As a Baptist minister, you'd think his position would be reflected by his denomination's religious beliefs that abortion is wrong in all cases--the position generally held by the Baptist Church in the US in general. Of course, that position is completely incompatible with being a Democrat so you get crickets when it comes up from a money grubbing political hack like Warnock.
Click to expand...

Why won't McCarthy denounce twump having Nazis at his house and calling for the Constitution to be canceled?

Also, you really don't see the irony about your accusing Warnock of moral failings? Who's he running against?

Seriously, dude.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I think abortion is a decision that two people have to make. I don't have a problem with it being on demand for say the first trimester of a pregnancy and for valid medical reasons (eg., rare) afterwards.

I don't think it's a "woman's right to choose" unless you abolish child support being paid by men. After all, it takes two to tango and therefore this is very much in the vein of contract law. One side in that contract doesn't hold all the rights to what happens.
Click to expand...

There is no such thing as "abortion on demand". And most abortions are done within 8-10 weeks. Once they go beyond that, you can be sure they want the babies.

And men do not get pregnant.
 
BartenderElite said:
It's just a "gotcha" question. Pollsters have advised Dems to stay away from it - because their answers will be taken out of context.
Click to expand...

The entire GOP is playing politics by not denouncing twump for his having an orgy with Nazis, taking secret docs and calling for the repeal of the Constitution. And now their all endorsing Walker. It's a good thing Republicans don't have shame or they'd die from it!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top