Diesel
Well-known member
Oh. Sweetie. It really really is.
Senate approves historic legislation to protect same-sex marriages
- Thread starter Guno צְבִי
- Start date
Oh. Sweetie. It really really is.
Diesel
Well-known member
You have to keep in mind that PostmodernProphet and Earl are medically stupid. They're literal morons.
Diesel
Well-known member
The Grand Architect sucked my dick this morning. I came in Her eye.
You will never be a real woman. Cope.
Diesel
Well-known member
A third of women, claimed by you and unsubstantiated, oppose abortion? What exactly would you like anyone reading this to take from that? How can I uphold my respect for democracy in your mind when you face me with "one-third of women"?
Aside from all of that ridiculous bullshit, a third of Americans think the 2020 presidential election was stolen. A third of Americans think Donald Trump is an honest person. I don't give one flying fuck how many brain dead morons think anything. Democracy functions properly when the electorate is properly informed and educated. Americans are, by every measure, dumber than fucking dog shit, and I will not value, respect, admire, or acknowledge the "opinions" of idiots.
Diesel
Well-known member
Yes. That's the plan. We're going to marry sheep and chairs and leaves and your slut daughter. Idiot.
Diesel
Well-known member
How many times have you been forced to marry a man, you false Xtian?
You will never be a real woman. Cope.
Diesel
Well-known member
Please shut up forever, you ignorant slut. This is the entire text of the bill that you never read:
In the Senate of the United States,
November 29, 2022.
Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 8404) entitled “An Act to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and ensure respect for State regulation of marriage, and for other purposes.”, do pass with the following
AMENDMENT:
Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the following:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Respect for Marriage Act”.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family.
(2) Diverse beliefs about the role of gender in marriage are held by reasonable and sincere people based on decent and honorable religious or philosophical premises. Therefore, Congress affirms that such people and their diverse beliefs are due proper respect.
(3) Millions of people, including interracial and same-sex couples, have entered into marriages and have enjoyed the rights and privileges associated with marriage. Couples joining in marriage deserve to have the dignity, stability, and ongoing protection that marriage affords to families and children.
SEC. 3. REPEAL OF SECTION ADDED TO TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE, BY SECTION 2 OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT.
Section 1738C of title 28, United States Code, is repealed.
SEC. 4. FULL FAITH AND CREDIT GIVEN TO MARRIAGE EQUALITY.
Chapter 115 of title 28, United States Code, as amended by this Act, is further amended by inserting after section 1738B the following:
Ҥ 1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect thereof
“(a) In General.—No person acting under color of State law may deny—
“(1) full faith and credit to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State pertaining to a marriage between 2 individuals, on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals; or
“(2) a right or claim arising from such a marriage on the basis that such marriage would not be recognized under the law of that State on the basis of the sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin of those individuals.
“(b) Enforcement By Attorney General.—The Attorney General may bring a civil action in the appropriate United States district court against any person who violates subsection (a) for declaratory and injunctive relief.
“(c) Private Right Of Action.—Any person who is harmed by a violation of subsection (a) may bring a civil action in the appropriate United States district court against the person who violated such subsection for declaratory and injunctive relief.
“(d) State Defined.—In this section, the term ‘State’ has the meaning given such term under section 7 of title 1.”.
SEC. 5. MARRIAGE RECOGNITION.
Section 7 of title 1, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 7. Marriage
“(a) For the purposes of any Federal law, rule, or regulation in which marital status is a factor, an individual shall be considered married if that individual’s marriage is between 2 individuals and is valid in the State where the marriage was entered into or, in the case of a marriage entered into outside any State, if the marriage is between 2 individuals and is valid in the place where entered into and the marriage could have been entered into in a State.
“(b) In this section, the term ‘State’ means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any other territory or possession of the United States.
“(c) For purposes of subsection (a), in determining whether a marriage is valid in a State or the place where entered into, if outside of any State, only the law of the jurisdiction applicable at the time the marriage was entered into may be considered.”.
SEC. 6. NO IMPACT ON RELIGIOUS LIBERTY AND CONSCIENCE.
(a) In General.—Nothing in this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, shall be construed to diminish or abrogate a religious liberty or conscience protection otherwise available to an individual or organization under the Constitution of the United States or Federal law.
(b) Goods Or Services.—Consistent with the First Amendment to the Constitution, nonprofit religious organizations, including churches, mosques, synagogues, temples, nondenominational ministries, interdenominational and ecumenical organizations, mission organizations, faith-based social agencies, religious educational institutions, and nonprofit entities whose principal purpose is the study, practice, or advancement of religion, and any employee of such an organization, shall not be required to provide services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges for the solemnization or celebration of a marriage. Any refusal under this subsection to provide such services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges shall not create any civil claim or cause of action.
SEC. 7. STATUTORY PROHIBITION.
(a) No Impact On Status And Benefits Not Arising From A Marriage.—Nothing in this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, shall be construed to deny or alter any benefit, status, or right of an otherwise eligible entity or person which does not arise from a marriage, including tax-exempt status, tax treatment, educational funding, or a grant, contract, agreement, guarantee, loan, scholarship, license, certification, accreditation, claim, or defense.
(b) No Federal Recognition Of Polygamous Marriages.—Nothing in this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, shall be construed to require or authorize Federal recognition of marriages between more than 2 individuals.
SEC. 8. SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, or the application of such provision to any person, entity, government, or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, or any amendment made thereby, or the application of such provision to all other persons, entities, governments, or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby.
Diesel
Well-known member
WELL-PROGRAMMED. You're a fucking bot, and a piss poor one at that.
Diesel
Well-known member
How many men have you tried to marry, faggot?
Diesel
Well-known member
That is a terrifying proposition but entirely possible. Don't jinx us. I think the Trumps and Earls and Marjorie Taylor Greenes and Postmodern Prophets and Jim Jordans will destroy the Republican party in the next two years. At least I hope so.
Diesel
Well-known member
True story. Wherever fat, white people are eating Wonder Bread and mudding their clunker trucks is a place that just can't be saved.
Diesel
Well-known member
The US will fail. I have no doubt. The timing is unknown to me, but this experiment went as far as it could. Democracy relies on education, quality information, and good sense. Americans have none of that because that's what they chose for themselves. American conservatives in particular destroyed the country beyond repair.
Diesel
Well-known member
Nah, we'll stick around to watch you assholes die first.
Diesel
Well-known member
You're such a regressive fucking moron. Does your family read what you post here?
Diesel
Well-known member
Who would, cunt? Me? You think I would starve if I cut out your fat honky cracker ass shit hole states out of my country? Let's test it.
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Pew Research (one of the most reputable polling organizations) says 35% of women oppose abortion in all/most cases.
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/fact-sheet/public-opinion-on-abortion/
Since we were talking about states making policy on abortion (and marriage) the opinion of voters in those states is relevant since they are voting on referenda or officials who will make that policy.
You sound like you would be happier in a dictatorship of "enlightened" rulers who agree with you since you have no faith or respect for the opinion of American voters.