I agree. But, as I've said, the MSN putting the weapon used (semi auto rifles) in the spotlight would significantly reduce the use of them in "mass shootings."
Anderson Lee Aldridge: What we know about Colorado Springs LGBT nightclub shooter
- Thread starter Guno צְבִי
- Start date
I agree. But, as I've said, the MSN putting the weapon used (semi auto rifles) in the spotlight would significantly reduce the use of them in "mass shootings."
Why?
These idiots are looking for attention. What better way to get it than by shooting a lot of people with that weapon while the media screams it wants that (highly publicized) weapon banned?
That's correct...
Are you all for locking up the criminals that attacked the US Capitol on Jan 6th? Why are you against locking up criminals?
That makes little/no sense.
A - there was TONS of attention by the MSM over the Virginia Tech shootings (back in 2007).
And he had 'only' two pistols.
Same with that guy that shot up a church a few years ago. Just a pistol.
And LOTS of other examples.
B - from wikipedia:
'Of the 172 events from 1966 to 2019 classified as mass public shootings (four or more victims killed) in the U.S. by the 2022 National Institute of Justice/The Violence Project dataset, perpetrators used handguns in 77.2% of cases and semi-automatic rifles in 25.1% of cases.[28] An earlier 2016 study by James Alan Fox and Emma E. Fridel similarly concluded that "rather than assault weapons, semiautomatic handguns are the weapons of choice for most mass shooters."'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States#Weapons_used
Even if there was no such thing as semi-auto rifles?
The vast majority of mass shootings would clearly, still go ahead.
Try reading what the nutcase said. Sainthood? He was a guy leading a hardscrabble life at the edges of society. He did not need to be killed by cops. They did not honor him. They protested police brutality. Why all the insults? Are you OK? Rightys do that so often.
Not without giving them a trial. And you?
When Volsrock was asking why someone that never had a trial wasn't in jail, you said..
Democrats are against locking up criminals.
I'm confused, are you for locking up people without a trial or not?
Democrats are against locking up criminals.
I'm confused, are you for locking up people without a trial or not?
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Gaye is normal natural healthy, according to you libs, so not an ad hom.
This is NOT an "ad-hom": "You eat your own feces".
This IS an "ad-hom": You're a stupid shit-eater.
There, always willing to help the mentally disabled. <-- that was "ad-hom", as well!
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
You eat your own feces.
And you just provided an example of your own mental weakness. You can't come up with your own trash talk, so you copy mine.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Life is Golden
The Sage
Ok. Then why the push to ban semi auto rifles? Do you think it's an infringement on the 2nd. Amendment?
Paul Pelosi attacker is being locked up without a trial...so are u for that?
I am not getting into yet another, pointless discussion - especially if you are a closed-minded, gun bunny (not saying you are) - about guns.
I think legal gun owners should be able to conceal and buy any handheld gun they want - including semi-auto rifles.
If more people carried CONCEALED (especially teachers)... there would be FAR, less mass shootings.
BUT I don't think ANYONE who has not served in either the fulltime or reserve military, should be able to own a gun.
That is my interpretation of the 2'nd Amendment.
And you know what?
It's right.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...icans-in-the-military-(full-time-or-reserves)
And if you (or anyone else) don't agree?
I really, do not much care.
We are done here.
Good day.