floridafan
Verified User
there is no official documentation of the process.
Thats BS. The SM asked trump to prove these documents were declassified. How could he do that if there was no process. Your excuses are pathetic.
there is no official documentation of the process.
you are not a judge, but we will remember your opinion fondly when you are dead......
This is a civil lawsuit. Are you sure you are a lawyer because you don't seem to know even the basics of burden of proof in a civil lawsuit.
Thats BS. The SM asked trump to prove these documents were declassified. How could he do that if there was no process. Your excuses are pathetic.
that's why it represents judicial treachery.
right. not a real crime.
A crime has not yet been charged.
A crime has not yet been charged. Trump's refusal to provide evidence of declassification because he doesn't want to give up his criminal defense would point to there likely being a crime here and Trump's lawyers fully expect a criminal indictment.
Just like in NY, Trump can't use a criminal defense to refuse to provide evidence in a civil case without consequences in the civil case. His refusal to provide the evidence is seen as lack of evidence on his side so the preponderance of evidence standard comes into play. DoJ- evidence of documents with classified markings. Trump - zero evidence refuting it.
exactly.
more smoke and mirrors.
Like he's been fucked the last 6 years but still walks free? Lmfao Either trumps a criminal mastermind or you people are incompetent idiots.
Another masterful stupid reply by Yakuda.
Thats BS. The SM asked trump to prove these documents were declassified. How could he do that if there was no process. Your excuses are pathetic.
What a totally ignorant statement. If what you say was true, then in future years, no one would ever know what documents were or were not classified. In effect everything would be declassified.
well obviously not if no president ever declassified them......
This is a civil lawsuit. Are you sure you are a lawyer because you don't seem to know even the basics of burden of proof in a civil lawsuit.
You are also not a judge. Dearie is a judge. Dearie basically said until Trump provides evidence of declassifying documents they will be presumed to be classified. Trump "can't have his cake and eat it."
are you claiming the DOJ obtained a warrant in a civil lawsuit....after predicting he was going to prison for stealing nuclear secrets?.........yeah, I know what the burden of proof is in a civil lawsuit......did you know a civil law suit isn't going to prevent Trump from running for president in 2024?.......
well please provide a link the him saying that so we can see if you pulled it out of your ass or not........so far all they've talked about is the timing of the steps of process......
Dearie said the government had presented "prima facie evidence" that the documents are, because they bear classification markings.
"As far as I'm concerned, that's the end of it," Dearie said, unless Trump's team has some evidence to the contrary.
You are also not a judge. Dearie is a judge. Dearie basically said until Trump provides evidence of declassifying documents they will be presumed to be classified. Trump "can't have his cake and eat it."
Can't answer the question can you you intellectual pygmy