How was the 4th Violated?

THE FOURTH AMENDMENT

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

SOUNDS LIKE THE FBI FOLLOWED PROPER CONSTITUTIONAL PROCEDURE?!?!?

There was nothing reasonable about the search it was a falsely predicated warrant signed off on by a political hack judge in order to aid in the coverup of the FBI’s seditious conspiracy by seizing a copy of the spygate dossier that they were given a direct Presidential order to redact and release two years ago!
 
THE FOURTH AMENDMENT

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

SOUNDS LIKE THE FBI FOLLOWED PROPER CONSTITUTIONAL PROCEDURE?!?!?

How reasonable is specifying that anything from the day Trump took office until the day he left, along with anything nearby--regardless of what it is--can be seized as part of a search that covers a large estate and resort allowing agents to go virtually anywhere on it looking for stuff to take?

How does that particularly describe the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized?
 
How reasonable is specifying that anything from the day Trump took office until the day he left, along with anything nearby--regardless of what it is--can be seized as part of a search that covers a large estate and resort allowing agents to go virtually anywhere on it looking for stuff to take?

How does that particularly describe the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized?

Are the documents Trump's or We, the People's?

How often did you take home classified material in your career, Chief? How often did you take Navy property home as your own?

Given your arguments supporting Pedo Don, I'm guessing you have a lot of classified documents and Navy property at your home. Are they souvenirs, or do you have them on Ebay?
 
THE FOURTH AMENDMENT

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

SOUNDS LIKE THE FBI FOLLOWED PROPER CONSTITUTIONAL PROCEDURE?!?!?

Our twumptard fools will repeat any nonsense they see on Fucks News, including threats to the FBI.

No rights were violated. After sever times say, "pretty please" and twump still wouldn't return our stuff, we went and got it.

Period.
 
Taken and returned. Was, say, a planned trip to play golf in Saudi Arabia ruined? The “violation” in this episode is the theft of numerous, sensitive government documents. If their recovery included a two day interruption in the storage of a passport, so fucking what. Secondly, if any harm had occurred who would have been at fault, Trump for taking property that isn’t his or the FBI for taking lawful action in getting it back.

They should have kept the passports and made trump ask them several times to return them - see how that orange moron likes it!
 
J-Rod asked what violated the 4th. the public has virtually no knowled gf of what was taken so cant speak to anything else.

but the passports were a clear violation.

Your face is a clear violation of a person's right not to have their eyes melt.
 
The ridiculous vagueness of the warrant, basically, "we're looking for some papers"; the seizure of his passports without listing them as taken, the lack of probable cause, and not one single document involving national security, contrary to the lies the FBI/DOJ started with the Fkae News.

And now, the LEAKED STREAM OF LIES to "get the narrative started"...just like the RUSSIA LIES...a violation of equal protection under the law (14th Amendment)

The warrant was NOT "vague". It showed exactly what they were looking for and what was taken back.
 
How would you know there is a lack of probable cause or that the warrant is vague…

Leaked stream of lies?!?

Exactly! All these tards know is the stream of bullshit sprayed at them from the Faux News firehose of lies.
 
this is close to a general warrant.
it lacks particularity of items to be seized and is unlimited in term of Trumps time in office.
What did they take? like 20 boxes?? all of that is evidence of a crime??? noooo. it's a grab bag

Particularity
https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/amendment-04/09-particularity.html
This requirement thus acts to limit the scope of the search, as the executing officers should be limited to looking in places where the described object could be expected to be found.133
The purpose of the particularity requirement extends beyond prevention of general searches; it also assures the person whose property is being searched of the lawful authority of the executing officer and of the limits of his power to search. It follows, therefore, that the warrant itself must describe with particularity the items to be seized, or that such itemization must appear in documents incorporated by reference in the warrant and actually shown to the person whose property is to be searched.134

The warrant was perfect. Blessed by a Federal judge and executed perfectly. You just think rules are made for those too stupid to get away with it.

Suck a butt.

And - Good morning!
 
There was nothing reasonable about the search it was a falsely predicated warrant signed off on by a political hack judge in order to aid in the coverup of the FBI’s seditious conspiracy by seizing a copy of the spygate dossier that they were given a direct Presidential order to redact and release two years ago!

It was signed off by a Federal judge who determined there was probable cause and that a crime had been committed.

You're just pissed because your criminal king got caught. You don't give a shit about our nation's security, bitch.
 
How reasonable is specifying that anything from the day Trump took office until the day he left, along with anything nearby--regardless of what it is--can be seized as part of a search that covers a large estate and resort allowing agents to go virtually anywhere on it looking for stuff to take?

How does that particularly describe the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized?

You're an idiot. Trump took our stuff, we asked for it back, he refused, so we went and got itl

How can you not understand something so fucking simple? Don't be a douche.
 
Back
Top