Footage of Jayland Walker being shot up to 60 times

He has that reputation but appears to be more factual this time...even if factless.

Let me help: https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/03/us/jayland-walker-police-shooting-video/index.html
A 25-year-old Black man suffered at least 60 wounds when police officers fatally shot him last week following a high-speed chase during which the man fired a gun out the driver's side window, authorities said.

Jayland Walker was unarmed at the time he was killed, though a gun was recovered from his car after the shooting, Akron, Ohio, Police Chief Stephen Mylett said at a news conference Sunday, when police released large portions of body camera videos from 13 officers who were at the scene, prompting more questions about Walker's death June 27.

We'll see. The cops have to prove everything they say. Not sure what shooting out the window was supposed to do. I think it's more likely they found the gun and the casing and made an assumption.
 
Because they all gunned down a fucking unarmed man, you dipfuck.

The video shows he is unarmed, dipshit.

Let's see your evidence, conspiracy nut.
Sorry, you're both sock and a dumbass. I have rules. Good luck with your idiocy. :thup:
 
No, for the second time, I'm criticizing the 8 police officers who murdered Walker. I know you can understand this.

Claiming they murdered him is prejudging. I'm surprised you don't understand the difference.
 
Claiming they murdered him is prejudging. I'm surprised you don't understand the difference.

Oh, you don't like the word murder? That's fine. Just learn to express yourself. They killed him. And for that I think they should be punished for negligent and excessive use of force resulting in death. What they did was wrong. But they'll get reinstated, paid, and everyone will forget the Black guy. Rinse and repeat.

We already went over this. I'm surprised you don't understand any of the conversation.
 
Claiming they murdered him is prejudging. I'm surprised you don't understand the difference.

They ruled it as a homicide.

Also I wouldn't be surprised if they are charged with wanton endangerment because they sprayed around 90 bullets in a urban neighborhood.
 
I think that may be a bit harsh. What I do think is that most people who choose that career path have to have control and authority over complete strangers, which is not an admirable character trait to me. I've also met a lot of police officers with Little Man/Little Woman syndrome who seem to have entered the force just to be assholes and get some revenge for whatever went wrong in their childhoods. Whatever happened here it was an obvious and unbelievable excessive use of force.
Agree with all but the last sentence.
 
No, it doesn't, he had no weapon. And taking the police's word for it, after the clusterfuck we saw of police lies after Uvalde, has to be the most braindead fucking thing I've heard of in my fucking life, you twat-faced bootlicker.

Aw, c'mon, be fair. ' Twat-faced racist bootlicker. '
 
Oh, you don't like the word murder? That's fine. Just learn to express yourself. They killed him. And for that I think they should be punished for negligent and excessive use of force resulting in death. What they did was wrong. But they'll get reinstated, paid, and everyone will forget the Black guy. Rinse and repeat.

We already went over this. I'm surprised you don't understand any of the conversation.

What's wrong with words? It's how those words are used that matter. For example the word homosexual pedophile is two words. Nothing wrong there. Accusing a member of one of those words is okay, but not the other.

In the case of the police, accusing them of murder before all the facts are in or the investigation is complete is prejudging them. You are free to prejudge all you like and I'm free to call you on it. If you don't like it, put me back on ignore or just ignore me.
 
They ruled it as a homicide.

Also I wouldn't be surprised if they are charged with wanton endangerment because they sprayed around 90 bullets in a urban neighborhood.

Of course. Killing anyone, even by accident, is homicide. Homicide doesn't equal murder.

It depends, but I tend to agree. If I was a home owner in the area, I'd be looking for holes in my home and filing suit for any that were found.
 
Prove it, you bootlicking little bitch

Got to admit it's hilarious watching libfucks like Lurch, and conservitards like you both claim that I'm somehow a 'sock'.

Jesus fucking Christ, another closet homo.... not that there's anything wrong with you liking men, just that you are dishonest about it. Fuck you, asshole.

Why are so many RW gays in the closet???
 
Yes, you're right- but necessary to make any impression upon the corporate establishment drones of JPP.

Most of the people who post on this website are beyond impressions. We're surrounded by idiots who can't be taught.
 
What's wrong with words? It's how those words are used that matter. For example the word homosexual pedophile is two words. Nothing wrong there. Accusing a member of one of those words is okay, but not the other.

In the case of the police, accusing them of murder before all the facts are in or the investigation is complete is prejudging them. You are free to prejudge all you like and I'm free to call you on it. If you don't like it, put me back on ignore or just ignore me.

I don't have the graceful patience to put up with your inane bullshit today. You're a dishonest prick whom I often try to get along with, but this kind of post is why people don't like you.

Your first paragraph was a waste of everyone's time. Typical Dutch throwaway garbage.

I didn't accuse anyone of murder. I used that word, but I used it improperly. What I already told you (fuck, I can't believe you're this dumb two days in a row) is that they killed him and that I consider their actions unacceptable. I've never put anyone on ignore.

You're such a fucking drama queen.
 
Back
Top