The Odds Are Increasing That Trump Gets Charged

Cassidy Hutchinson advances the 1/6 committee’s theory of the case

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/06/the-odds-are-going-up-that-trump-could-be-charged.html

On Tuesday, Cassidy Hutchinson provided some of the most damning public testimony yet in the public hearings by the House committee investigating January 6. Speaking clearly, deliberately, and thoughtfully, the former aide to White House chief of staff Mark Meadows provided a riveting and legitimately disturbing account of Donald Trump’s conduct before and during the attack on the Capitol. She appeared to provide the facts as she knew them, without needless speculation. And she seemed to take pains to specify precisely what she knew, how she knew it, and, as importantly, what she did not know. On its face, it was about as credible a performance as any witness can provide.

Hutchinson’s testimony also added distinct pieces of evidentiary support for what committee Vice-Chair Liz Cheney described during the first public hearing in June as a “sophisticated seven-part plan to overturn the 2020 election and prevent the transition of presidential power.” The committee’s members have made no secret of the fact that they believe that these are appropriate lines of inquiry for a criminal investigation that they would like to see the Justice Department undertake (assuming that it is not already doing so) and that Trump’s conduct could warrant criminal charges. Hutchinson’s testimony in particular advanced the theory that Trump intended for the violence at the Capitol to occur.

tenor.gif

With WHAT??? THROWING PLATE?



SHE LIED THROUGH HER TEETH..
 
She testified under oath, meaning she faces jail time if she lied.

EVERYONE claiming she lied was NOT under oath, meaning they can lie with impunity and face no reprisal.

If anyone wants to refute Hutchinson's claims, they can come testify UNDER OATH before the committee.

Hutchinson's claims are physically not possible. She's making it up. That's perjury right there. Oh...the Secret Service IS willing to file an affidavit (testimony under oath).
 
No he personally didn't need to since he had a cadre of armed followers willing to do it for him, and hopefully hang Mike Pence at the same time.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Paradox! You are STILL being irrational. Are you STILL going to quote the dubbed 'speech' that CNN keeps using????????????!?
 
Cassidy Hutchinson advances the 1/6 committee’s theory of the case

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/06/the-odds-are-going-up-that-trump-could-be-charged.html

On Tuesday, Cassidy Hutchinson provided some of the most damning public testimony yet in the public hearings by the House committee investigating January 6. Speaking clearly, deliberately, and thoughtfully, the former aide to White House chief of staff Mark Meadows provided a riveting and legitimately disturbing account of Donald Trump’s conduct before and during the attack on the Capitol. She appeared to provide the facts as she knew them, without needless speculation. And she seemed to take pains to specify precisely what she knew, how she knew it, and, as importantly, what she did not know. On its face, it was about as credible a performance as any witness can provide.

Hutchinson’s testimony also added distinct pieces of evidentiary support for what committee Vice-Chair Liz Cheney described during the first public hearing in June as a “sophisticated seven-part plan to overturn the 2020 election and prevent the transition of presidential power.” The committee’s members have made no secret of the fact that they believe that these are appropriate lines of inquiry for a criminal investigation that they would like to see the Justice Department undertake (assuming that it is not already doing so) and that Trump’s conduct could warrant criminal charges. Hutchinson’s testimony in particular advanced the theory that Trump intended for the violence at the Capitol to occur.

tenor.gif

Cassidy is the only one who committed a crime when she blatantly perjured herself. If you try to arrest Trump to prevent him from running in 2024 like this I'd Venezuela then we start shooting, end of, full stop.
 
She testified under oath, meaning she faces jail time if she lied.

EVERYONE claiming she lied was NOT under oath, meaning they can lie with impunity and face no reprisal.

If anyone wants to refute Hutchinson's claims, they can come testify UNDER OATH before the committee.

Ya everyone is lying except for her you retarded faggot. Engle and Ornato already testified under oath I guess they just forget to mention all this right? GFYS moron.
 
She testified under oath, meaning she faces jail time if she lied.

EVERYONE claiming she lied was NOT under oath, meaning they can lie with impunity and face no reprisal.

If anyone wants to refute Hutchinson's claims, they can come testify UNDER OATH before the committee.

she testified to things she didn't witness......what do you call a witness who didn't witness something?......
 
Back
Top