USA Today (routinely used by Fakebook to Fact Check) forced to delete 23 stories...

Damocles

Damocles

Accedo!
Staff member
The "journalism" in the stories was actually fabrication and the stories were written with 100% fictional sources... Thank the little GODS that they are so consistently used to "fact check" Fakebook.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/16/business/media/usa-today-fabricated-sources.html

And if you can't see NYTimes stories because of the pay wall:

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/16/media/usa-today-removes-articles/index.html

Apparently they do not fact check their own publication unless someone points out that they don't have their facts right... So, these folks that are part of the US "partners" to fact check Fakebook uses stories fabricated by "journalists" to fact check Fakebook...

And finally: Just in case you don't believe that Fakebook uses USA Today as factcheckers...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-facebook-identify-misinformation/5032239002/
 
Question:

Why did it take UselessNewsToday 23 articles by this tard of a "journalist" for them to figure this out?

Another question:

Has she been fired yet?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Question:

Why did it take UselessNewsToday 23 articles by this tard of a "journalist" for them to figure this out?

Another question:

Has she been fired yet?
Click to expand...
From the link:
Ms. Miranda resigned from USA Today recently, as the investigation progressed, according to a person briefed on the inquiry. Her most recent article for the newspaper was published on April 17.
 
anonymoose said:
From the link:
Ms. Miranda resigned from USA Today recently, as the investigation progressed, according to a person briefed on the inquiry. Her most recent article for the newspaper was published on April 17.
Click to expand...

Well, at least there's that...

Still doesn't explain why the editors failed to catch any of her fuck ups through 23 articles...
 
anonymoose said:
Indeed. But we know why.
Click to expand...

Well, I can see one of two reasons:

1. Those were the ones that slipped through and there were more the editors caught and kicked back for inaccurate quotes. Not likely, but possible.

2. The editors are "True Believers" and were in complete agreement with Miranda, and in being so couldn't see the bullshit for the dogma clouding their judgement. (highly likely)
 
Damocles said:
The "journalism" in the stories was actually fabrication and the stories were written with 100% fictional sources... Thank the little GODS that they are so consistently used to "fact check" Fakebook.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/16/business/media/usa-today-fabricated-sources.html

And if you can't see NYTimes stories because of the pay wall:

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/16/media/usa-today-removes-articles/index.html

Apparently they do not fact check their own publication unless someone points out that they don't have their facts right... So, these folks that are part of the US "partners" to fact check Fakebook uses stories fabricated by "journalists" to fact check Fakebook...

And finally: Just in case you don't believe that Fakebook uses USA Today as factcheckers...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-facebook-identify-misinformation/5032239002/
Click to expand...

Why do you continue to post links that require a paid subscription. Do you actually know this, or dont you bother to read the links that you post?
 
floridafan said:
Why do you continue to post links that require a paid subscription. Do you actually know this, or dont you bother to read the links that you post?
Click to expand...

I followed up with one from CNN that didn't need a paid subscription, even told you that some of y'all may want to use that one. Do you not bother to read the post that you respond to, or do you just do that to me because you want me to look good?
 
Damocles said:
I followed up with one from CNN that didn't need a paid subscription, even told you that some of y'all may want to use that one. Do you not bother to read the post that you respond to, or do you just do that to me because you want me to look good?
Click to expand...

This is just not a one and done, it happens frequently regardless of who your poster is.
 
floridafan said:
This is just not a one and done, it happens frequently regardless of who your poster is.
Click to expand...

Reality:

1. I realized that some may not be able to read the Times article because they are confounded by pay walls, so I found a story on CNN covering the same thing and gave that link noting that you can use that link if the Times article was behind a pay wall for you.
2. You stupidly stopped at the first link, didn't read the post, and could not figure out that the link that says: Just in case you need one that isn't behind a pay wall actually linked to the same subject on a site not behind a pay wall.
3. I pointed out to you how you could have solved this problem by simply reading the post.
4. You doubled down on stupid.

Now, can you click the second link and move on with your apparently incomprehensible to your own damned self life or must I repost that same link here so that you can find it?
 
Damocles said:
Reality:

1. I realized that some may not be able to read the Times article because they are confounded by pay walls, so I found a story on CNN covering the same thing and gave that link noting that you can use that link if the Times article was behind a pay wall for you.
2. You stupidly stopped at the first link, didn't read the post, and could not figure out that the link that says: Just in case you need one that isn't behind a pay wall actually linked to the same subject on a site not behind a pay wall.
3. I pointed out to you how you could have solved this problem by simply reading the post.
4. You doubled down on stupid.

Now, can you click the second link and move on with your apparently incomprehensible to your own damned self life or must I repost that same link here so that you can find it?
Click to expand...

I was well aware of everything you have said, I just wonder why the employees here tend to do the same thing, but only post a single link which requires a paid subscription. Its obvious that these employees have absolutely no idea of what they are posting.
 
floridafan said:
I was well aware of everything you have said, I just wonder why the employees here tend to do the same thing, but only post a single link which requires a paid subscription. Its obvious that these employees have absolutely no idea of what they are posting.
Click to expand...

There are no "employees" here you idiot. I dont even know Damo but I bet Im real close on this........Damo is just some regular guy who for whatever reason enjoys having a web site. He probably has a little server in his office/man cave/basement where he plays with JPP in his spare time. The mods do their work here without pay,...mod work isnt worth a whole lot anyway,....NO,...thats not meant as a slam at all,....mods do this for fun. JPP isnt what you seem to think it is. Jpp is a computer and a server sitting in some guys bedroom somewhere that the site owner and mods do as a hobby. Thats it.
 
Stone said:
There are no "employees" here you idiot. I dont even know Damo but I bet Im real close on this........Damo is just some regular guy who for whatever reason enjoys having a web site. He probably has a little server in his office/man cave/basement where he plays with JPP in his spare time. The mods do their work here without pay,...mod work isnt worth a whole lot anyway,....NO,...thats not meant as a slam at all,....mods do this for fun. JPP isnt what you seem to think it is. Jpp is a computer and a server sitting in some guys bedroom somewhere that the site owner and mods do as a hobby. Thats it.
Click to expand...

Of course, why would I ever thing you were bullshitting?
 
Damocles said:
The "journalism" in the stories was actually fabrication and the stories were written with 100% fictional sources... Thank the little GODS that they are so consistently used to "fact check" Fakebook.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/16/business/media/usa-today-fabricated-sources.html

And if you can't see NYTimes stories because of the pay wall:

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/16/media/usa-today-removes-articles/index.html

Apparently they do not fact check their own publication unless someone points out that they don't have their facts right... So, these folks that are part of the US "partners" to fact check Fakebook uses stories fabricated by "journalists" to fact check Fakebook...

And finally: Just in case you don't believe that Fakebook uses USA Today as factcheckers...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-facebook-identify-misinformation/5032239002/
Click to expand...

He resigned.
 
Thats all it is dummy. I know almost nothing about computers and I even had my own message board once. Had about 20 members and almost all the same features that we have here. Didnt even need a server either, found it free online. You pick out how you want it layed out, pick what you want it to look like.....done.
 
Last edited:
T. A. Gardner said:
Well, I can see one of two reasons:

1. Those were the ones that slipped through and there were more the editors caught and kicked back for inaccurate quotes. Not likely, but possible.

2. The editors are "True Believers" and were in complete agreement with Miranda, and in being so couldn't see the bullshit for the dogma clouding their judgement. (highly likely)
Click to expand...

3: This employee was doing exactly what her bosses hired her to do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top