I think that delivering the hearing in two hour segments is brilliant, it doesn’t drone on and it keeps people tuning back into the proceedings.
And even you don’t agree with it
1.8 Death Penalty
We oppose the administration of the death penalty by the state.
What is your proof that all the witnesses are lying?
They've laid out their case and all you can do is whine about it, not refute it. That's how I know they are telling the truth.
You should consider ceasing to be a traitor and Trump supporter in favor of a political party that truly does support freedom and a strong Constitution: the Libertarian Party.
![]()
So you are claiming all the witnesses are lying because no one was harassing the witnesses?
REALLY?
Complex question fallacy. What I claim is you, and I, have no way of knowing if some, or all, of the witnesses are lying. Your question makes this an absolute which turns it into a complex question fallacy. What if half, or a third, of what witnesses said is a lie? How much lying is too much to trust the, or a, witness? The committee members have already been caught in lies--like the one about police dying during this riot. Should anyone believe them?
Without adversarial examination we have no way to evaluate if what the committee is saying is true or not. We are forced to go to outside sources and try and make that determination ourselves, if we bother to.
Amazing you still do not know the difference between a hearing and a trial.
Complex question fallacy. What I claim is you, and I, have no way of knowing if some, or all, of the witnesses are lying. Your question makes this an absolute which turns it into a complex question fallacy. What if half, or a third, of what witnesses said is a lie? How much lying is too much to trust the, or a, witness? The committee members have already been caught in lies--like the one about police dying during this riot. Should anyone believe them?
Without adversarial examination we have no way to evaluate if what the committee is saying is true or not. We are forced to go to outside sources and try and make that determination ourselves, if we bother to.
More amazing is the Jan 6 committee doesn't...
That wasn't the question, but what you offer is just a massive logical fallacy. By way of using the same logic,What is your proof that all the witnesses aren't lying?
Without cross examination, without critical opposition, without adversarial questioning, there's no way to know if the witnesses are lying or telling the truth. There's no way to know if all available evidence is being presented or if you are just getting cherry picked information one side wants you to have.
More amazing is the Jan 6 committee doesn't...
Dutch that crap is racist

https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch...us-could-it-sway-libertarian-party-hard-right
Members of the of the Libertarian Party (LP) are concerned about the Mises Caucus (MC) winning control of the party at the May 26 national convention, ushering in an era of collaboration between the U.S.’s largest third party and the hard-right movement inside the Republican Party.