So far the "other side" is angerly arguing about the Congressional committee's report by attacking the messenger as predicted by claiming its a partisan witch hunt.
Lets put aside a dislike of the messenger for this thread and address the evidence and argument presented.....
They put forth evidence and an argument that:
1) Trump knew or should have known he lost the election.
The evidence they presented was Trumps Attorney General telling him that the claims of Fraud were "BULL SHIT".
That his Chief Lawyer in charge of fraud told him there was nothing to it.
That his official White House advisor and daughter believed he had lost.
That Mark Meadows, his Chief of Staff told him he had lost.
That his unofficial advisor Sean Hannity knew he had lost.
2) Being in the position to knowing of should have known that he had lost Trump continued to seek methods of staying in office after his term expired.
He told his supporters there was fraud.
He implored his supporters to do something about it.
He asked his supporters to show up in mass on January 6.
He attempted to push his Vice President to refuse to certify the official electoral votes.
He pushed and oversaw his employees to put together unofficial and uncertified electors to be ready to present electoral votes that he knew or should have known were not reflective of the vote.
He held a rally where he told his people to go, during the certification process and fight like hell.
While his supporters were illegally entering the Capital and violently fighting the police where the election was being certified he tweeted that Mike Pence had not done "the right thing",
While Congressmen were pleating with him to send help, he refused to do so for several hours until he found out Mike Pence had ordered it done.
How do you counter these two points from the Committee?
Lets put aside a dislike of the messenger for this thread and address the evidence and argument presented.....
They put forth evidence and an argument that:
1) Trump knew or should have known he lost the election.
The evidence they presented was Trumps Attorney General telling him that the claims of Fraud were "BULL SHIT".
That his Chief Lawyer in charge of fraud told him there was nothing to it.
That his official White House advisor and daughter believed he had lost.
That Mark Meadows, his Chief of Staff told him he had lost.
That his unofficial advisor Sean Hannity knew he had lost.
2) Being in the position to knowing of should have known that he had lost Trump continued to seek methods of staying in office after his term expired.
He told his supporters there was fraud.
He implored his supporters to do something about it.
He asked his supporters to show up in mass on January 6.
He attempted to push his Vice President to refuse to certify the official electoral votes.
He pushed and oversaw his employees to put together unofficial and uncertified electors to be ready to present electoral votes that he knew or should have known were not reflective of the vote.
He held a rally where he told his people to go, during the certification process and fight like hell.
While his supporters were illegally entering the Capital and violently fighting the police where the election was being certified he tweeted that Mike Pence had not done "the right thing",
While Congressmen were pleating with him to send help, he refused to do so for several hours until he found out Mike Pence had ordered it done.
How do you counter these two points from the Committee?
