McConnell to Pelosi: Stop Dragging Your Feet on Bill to Protect SCOTUS Families

those are special detail not permanently assigned

https://rollcall.com/2018/03/14/sup...-their-own-security-choices-documents-reveal/
Supreme Court justices only get security protection during domestic trips outside the Washington metropolitan area when they request it, according to a U.S. Marshals Service policy unveiled Wednesday by a court watchdog group.

Fix the Court, a nonpartisan group that advocates accountability and transparency at the Supreme Court, obtained the security policy and hundreds of pages of related records through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The documents are an official and more detailed peek inside a security arrangement that gives justices broad discretion when it comes to their protection.

~~

Stop lying, dookie.

The justices are protected around the clock by either the Supreme Court Police or the US Marshall's Service....

image1.jpg


Also....

Screenshot-20220609-083354.jpg


They have the right to decline protection, so if they do, anything that might happen to them would be of their own choosing.

It is also illegal to demonstrate outside SCOTUS/judges homes -but Garland isn't making charges

Yes, except that it depends on the motive for the protest, something which is open to interpretation and it would have to be proven that the reason for doing so was to obstruct the judicial process or a particular proceeding, or to influence a justice's decision.....

Screenshot-20220609-084422-2.jpg


Once again.... you've failed.

Vlad will not be pleased.
 
Pelosi wants someone to shoot a SC justice with a AR15.

And you love it when babies are torn to pieces by AR 15's in your own state because you love you guns more than babies. When I told you the parents were desperate for answers, and that a Spanish interpreter was promised but not provided, you said: "Well, the parents should have been here legally and learned English".

You're a parent, you soulless fuck. Can you imagine being desperate for answers, your baby just torn to pieces by one of your precious guns, and the governor or your state, sneers at them and walks away?

You suck doc. You just do. God have mercy on you,dude.
 
Doesn't Kavanaugh have a weapon for protection? What does he need security for? Just block all the doors except for one and make sure the family is armed.
He may have just that exact thing. But school should have armed personnel on campus like Kavanaugh had armed marshals on his property and just the sight of them changed the crazed shooter's mind and saved lives.
 
Stop lying, dookie.

The justices are protected around the clock by either the Supreme Court Police or the US Marshall's Service....

image1.jpg


Also....

Screenshot-20220609-083354.jpg


They have the right to decline protection, so if they do, anything that might happen to them would be of their own choosing.



Yes, except that it depends on the motive for the protest, something which is open to interpretation and it would have to be proven that the reason for doing so was to obstruct the judicial process or a particular proceeding, or to influence a justice's decision.....

Screenshot-20220609-084422-2.jpg


Once again.... you've failed.

Vlad will not be pleased.
idiot. we are talking about their homes.
The detail at the house is not permanent -of course they are protected in DC

WTF do you mean "interpretation" demonstrations are inherently ipso facto to sway a judge.
They arent demonstrating for any other reason + they are doxxed.

https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/...protest-outside-supreme-court-justices-homes/
The "Picketing or Parading" law states that anyone "with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer in the discharge of his duty," cannot picket near a judge's residence. A conviction on this charge could come with up to a year in prison, a fine, or both.

The distinction is important: This law doesn't speak to gatherings of people who protest a court's decision but focuses instead on gatherings that seek to influence a decision. And in this case, with a leaked draft that is not yet final, the appearance of attempted influence is clear.

There is also precedent. In the 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case Cox v. Louisiana, justices concluded that picketing outside courtrooms and judges' homes with the intent to influence decisions "infringes a substantial state interest in protecting the judicial process." The majority opinion insisted that "mob law is the very antithesis of due process."

Legal experts are weighing in and concluding that the law appears to be clear.
 
He may have just that exact thing. But school should have armed personnel on campus like Kavanaugh had armed marshals on his property and just the sight of them changed the crazed shooter's mind and saved lives.

There was an armed security officer in Parkland. He was killed right away. The poor kids at Robb just were not rich enough for their officer to show up.

You suck.
 
And you love it when babies are torn to pieces by AR 15's in your own state because you love you guns more than babies. When I told you the parents were desperate for answers, and that a Spanish interpreter was promised but not provided, you said: "Well, the parents should have been here legally and learned English".
Proof I said that or you are lying again Lurch.

You're a parent, you soulless fuck. Can you imagine being desperate for answers, your baby just torn to pieces by one of your precious guns, and the governor or your state, sneers at them and walks away?

You suck doc. You just do. God have mercy on you,dude.
What are the odds that a largely Hispanic police force that deals with a largely Hispanic community didn't have a Spanish speaking person that could communicate with the parent? I bet this is just another one of your Nazi lies.
 
Proof I said that or you are lying again Lurch.

What are the odds that a largely Hispanic police force that deals with a largely Hispanic community didn't have a Spanish speaking person that could communicate with the parent? I bet this is just another one of your Nazi lies.

I'm not lying. You said it. Might not be your EXACT words, but I swear to God you did. And that's when I learned who you were.

So, I'm not going to ignore you doc, but I am going to watch and flame you like I do all the other Nazi trolls on this site.

You said it. I promise you did. I might exaggerate or use hyperbole in some cases, but NOT this time. You said it... and I think you might actually be remembering right now you did.

So sorry you turned out to be so broken.
 
There was an armed security officer in Parkland. He was killed right away. The poor kids at Robb just were not rich enough for their officer to show up.

You suck.
PROOF ! Lurch PROOF! There was an unarmed coach that sacrificed himself trying to save his students. Imagine if the coach had been armed . Lives could have been saved. The Parkland shooter walked right in through an UNLOCKED DOOR. Lurch do you lock your doors? Why?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/parkland-school-shooting-hero-football-coach-aaron-feis-died-shielding-n848311
 
"These protests are disturbing the peace and tranquility of the neighborhood. The Barrett family is being disrupted and threatened by these protesters. Their children, and other kids in the neighborhood, can’t play outside, ride their bikes in the cul-de-sac, or just be kids.

The Barrett protesters are even using bullhorns to shout their profanity-laced slogans, all obviously intended to pressure, coerce, scare, and intimidate a justice of the United States Supreme Court.

There have also been protests at the Alexandria, Virginia, home of Justice Samuel Alito.

Even Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., someone who supports abortion, says that what is happening is “reprehensible.” “Stay away from the homes and families of election officials and members of the court,” he said.

Durbin is right. A recent poll showed that 75% of those polled do not agree with publishing the homes addresses of the five Supreme Court justices nor do they agree with the protests happening at their homes.

Federal law is quite clear. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1507, it is a criminal violation of federal law to picket or parade “near a building or residence occupied or used by [a federal] judge, juror, witness, or court officer” with the “intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty.”
heritage.org
 
He may have just that exact thing. But school should have armed personnel on campus like Kavanaugh had armed marshals on his property and just the sight of them changed the crazed shooter's mind and saved lives.

So according to flakes like you, we should turn schools into armed compounds? What about school busses? Will they be next to require armed guards? Kids will feel like they're on their way to prison then when they get there, feel like they're IN prison.

And how about on the playground? Armed guards stationed along the fence? Up in the trees?

All because the SELFISH ASSHOLE GUN SUCKERS can't bear the idea that one of our precious "rights", one that was included in our founding document 250 years ago when our country was almost completely wilderness, might be slightly amended or abridged so that hopefully in time, the current epidemic of gun related violence and carnage might be abated.

Right-wingers are truly ignorant, small-minded, short-sighted, self-centered, lowbrow jerk offs who are every bit as detrimental to the advancement of our culture and society as any violence-loving gangstas and ghetto thugs.

You're all just opposite sides of the same worthless, shit smeared coin, mired in your own excrement.

Fuck all of you. :fu:
 
idiot. we are talking about their homes.
The detail at the house is not permanent -of course they are protected in DC

WTF do you mean "interpretation" demonstrations are inherently ipso facto to sway a judge.
They arent demonstrating for any other reason + they are doxxed.

https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/...protest-outside-supreme-court-justices-homes/
The "Picketing or Parading" law states that anyone "with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer in the discharge of his duty," cannot picket near a judge's residence. A conviction on this charge could come with up to a year in prison, a fine, or both.

The distinction is important: This law doesn't speak to gatherings of people who protest a court's decision but focuses instead on gatherings that seek to influence a decision. And in this case, with a leaked draft that is not yet final, the appearance of attempted influence is clear.

There is also precedent. In the 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case Cox v. Louisiana, justices concluded that picketing outside courtrooms and judges' homes with the intent to influence decisions "infringes a substantial state interest in protecting the judicial process." The majority opinion insisted that "mob law is the very antithesis of due process."

Legal experts are weighing in and concluding that the law appears to be clear.

Fuck you, lying Putin dick sucker.

They have around the clock security outside their homes and anywhere else they go inside the greater DC area provided by their own police force.

Yes, they have their own police force!!!! Why wouldn't that police force provide protection for them at home????

When they travel outside the DC area, they have protection of US Marshalls which they can opt to decline if they are that reckless and stupid.

The law against protesting outside of any judges home states specifically that to be prohibited, it must be for the purpose of trying to disrupt a proceeding or to sway an opinion.

The issue being PROOF OF INTENT.

Merely expressing feelings on a particular issue is protected under the 1st Amendment.

I realize that being the commie-loving piece of shit that you are, free speech is not even on your list of things to protect.

Except for when it comes to the "free speech" rights of your fellow lying commie asshole propaganda spouting Trumpsuckers to inundate social media with lies and misinformation about issues related to your god, Trump.
 
Surely the justices have the right to own a gun to protect themselves just like every other American. Isn't that enough in the world the justices have dictated for the rest of us?
it might be if they weren't doxxed and targeted like that Democrat who flew in from California to kill K.
In the real world -no. You can bet Pelosi has a wall and (maybe) hired guns at her compound
 
So according to flakes like you, we should turn schools into armed compounds? What about school busses? Will they be next to require armed guards? Kids will feel like they're on their way to prison then when they get there, feel like they're IN prison.

And how about on the playground? Armed guards stationed along the fence? Up in the trees?

All because the SELFISH ASSHOLE GUN SUCKERS can't bear the idea that one of our precious "rights", one that was included in our founding document 250 years ago when our country was almost completely wilderness, might be slightly amended or abridged so that hopefully in time, the current epidemic of gun related violence and carnage might be abated.

Right-wingers are truly ignorant, small-minded, short-sighted, self-centered, lowbrow jerk offs who are every bit as detrimental to the advancement of our culture and society as any violence-loving gangstas and ghetto thugs.

You're all just opposite sides of the same worthless, shit smeared coin, mired in your own excrement.

Fuck all of you. :fu:
Snowflake hyperbole . Do you even lock your doors? Why? Do you live in a prison?:fu::fu::fu:


Does Joe use GoJoe ass lube on your ass? :magagrin:
 
Fuck you, lying Putin dick sucker.

They have around the clock security outside their homes and anywhere else they go inside the greater DC area provided by their own police force.

Yes, they have their own police force!!!! Why wouldn't that police force provide protection for them at home????

When they travel outside the DC area, they have protection of US Marshalls which they can opt to decline if they are that reckless and stupid.

The law against protesting outside of any judges home states specifically that to be prohibited, it must be for the purpose of trying to disrupt a proceeding or to sway an opinion.

The issue being PROOF OF INTENT.

Merely expressing feelings on a particular issue is protected under the 1st Amendment.

I realize that being the commie-loving piece of shit that you are, free speech is not even on your list of things to protect.

Except for when it comes to the "free speech" rights of your fellow lying commie asshole propaganda spouting Trumpsuckers to inundate social media with lies and misinformation about issues related to your god, Trump.
jesus you bloviate stupidity

No the home security details are NEW - just authorized by Garland
~~

Supreme Court Justices to Get Around-the-Clock Home Security (1)
May 18, 2022, 6:01 PM

US Supreme Court justices will receive around-the-clock security at home,
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-la...ices-to-get-around-the-clock-security-at-home

there is no "intent" required. simply demonstrating is the intent to "influence"
 
Snowflake hyperbole . Do you even lock your doors? Why? Do you live in a prison?:fu::fu::fu:

Typical big-mouthed, gasbag, right-wing snowflake pansy-ass behavior.

Sidestep the issue when they get their asses handed to them.

Fucking losers. :fu:

Children should not need armed guards everywhere they go, especially in school.

And BTW.....

WHO IS GOING TO PAY FOR ALL THESE ARMED GUARDS IN EVERY ONE OF THE 50,000 SCHOOLS IN THE US???

WHOSE PROPERTY TAXES WILL HAVE TO BE RAISED AND BY HOW MUCH???

EVER THINK OF THAT, GOOBER???


Fucking idiot. :palm:
 
it might be if they weren't doxxed and targeted like that Democrat who flew in from California to kill K.
In the real world -no. You can bet Pelosi has a wall and (maybe) hired guns at her compound


I heard he drove from California which means he had even more time to think about it. Think about it Steve Scalise was almost killed by a Democrat and now this near miss. Democrats are just crazy murders. The Uvalde shooter was 18 and Hispanic two key demographics for Democrats. Democrats are just blood thirsty murderers .
 
Back
Top