Sussmann acquitted on charge brought by special counsel Durham

Lionfish said:
Did I ever say Sussman was guilty or innocent? I just found the connections with the Clintons to be interesting just as you would have if any of the Trumps were involved.
Click to expand...

What connections to the Clintons?

Donating to a campaign doesn't mean you have a connection with the person. Someone that donated to Trump was on the Manafort jury that found him guilty. It's the same duty for every juror. To listen to the evidence and decide based on the evidence.
 
One of the longest running federal Independent prosecutor investigations in modern history, just to come up with a Nothingburger??
 
LMAO.Jury nullification going in.
3 clinton donors and 1 juror who's daughter plays on Sussmans daughter's team

But we know Hillary approved and schemed the whole thing - that's all the "accountability":rolleyes: you get in DC
 
dukkha said:
LMAO.Jury nullification going in.
3 clinton donors and 1 juror who's daughter plays on Sussmans daughter's team

But we know Hillary approved and schemed the whole thing - that's all the "accountability":rolleyes: you get in DC
Click to expand...
The jury decision was unanimous.
It strains the laws of statistics and probability to the breaking point that all 12 jurors were liberal partisan Democrats who were able to cleverly hide their biases from the prosecutors and Judge.

Tens of millions of Americans make political donations. It does not preclude them from jury duty and it never has. There is a high probability the prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judge have made political contributions consistent with their first amendment free speech rights.
 
"Jim — it’s Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss," the text message stated, according to Durham. "Do you have availability for a short meeting tomorrow? I’m coming on my own — not on behalf of a client or company — want to help the Bureau. Thanks."
 
Cypress said:
The jury decision was unanimous.
It strains the laws of statistics and probability to the breaking point that all 12 jurors were liberal partisan Democrats who were able to cleverly hide their biases from the prosecutors and Judge.

Tens of millions of Americans make political donations. It does not preclude them from jury duty and it never has. There is a high probability the prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judge have made political contributions consistent with their first amendment free speech rights.
Click to expand...
how do you know it was unanimous? a split jury also brings back a not guilty. and 3 on 1 jury? any Trump donors?
Kids who play on the same team as Sussman? If you cant see this is jury nullification...
but it was assumed that going in.
I would have been surprised by a guilty verdict even though he was guilty as sin

But it doesn't matter. 'Clinton did it" -she was behind the entire hoax and she approved the release to the press of the alpha bank and gawd knows what else.

Sussman put his lies in writing -he'll wind up on MSBC or write a book.
No Democrats ever get convicted in DC.. and then the text said it all
 
The Trumptards here have one argument..... 'IT'S HIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRYYYYYYYYYYYYYY''

The case was a loser. Durham has absolutely nothing.
 
dukkha said:
how do you know it was unanimous? a split jury also brings back a not guilty. and 3 on 1 jury? any Trump donors?
Kids who play on the same team as Sussman? If you cant see this is jury nullification...
but it was assumed that going in.
I would have been surprised by a guilty verdict even though he was guilty as sin

But it doesn't matter. 'Clinton did it" -she was behind the entire hoax and she approved the release to the press of the alpha bank and gawd knows what else.

Sussman put his lies in writing -he'll wind up on MSBC or write a book.
No Democrats ever get convicted in DC.. and then the text said it all
Click to expand...

It is widely reported in the media that the jury decision was unanimous
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/31/sussmann-acquitted-trump-special-counsel-00036033

But you aren't interested in the truth. If this jury had voted to convict, there isn't a shred of doubt you would have praised them
 
Cypress said:
It is widely reported in the media that the jury decision was unanimous
But you aren't interested in the truth. If this jury had voted to convict, there isn't a shred of doubt you would have praised them
Click to expand...
a juror will sometimes make it unanimous if they cant convict.
The evidence is overwhelming. The text is unambiguous. Maybe the looked at Baker's pettifogging-
who knows.

We do now a lot -and the trial bought out the fact Clinton launched the Steele dossier and approved the alpha-bank crap that Joffe and company cooked up, her minions back doored it to the FBI ( Nellie ohr) the FISA'a were fake, the Special Counsel was appointed despite there was "no evidence ( per Page)

and more I cant think of off the top of my head. Is Sussman walks on some narrow charge it doesnt change Crooked Hillary and the FBI complicity. It's a pyrrhic victory for the scoundrels who birthed and pushed the Hoax
 
dukkha said:
how do you know it was unanimous? a split jury also brings back a not guilty. and 3 on 1 jury? any Trump donors?
Kids who play on the same team as Sussman? If you cant see this is jury nullification...
but it was assumed that going in.
I would have been surprised by a guilty verdict even though he was guilty as sin

But it doesn't matter. 'Clinton did it" -she was behind the entire hoax and she approved the release to the press of the alpha bank and gawd knows what else.

Sussman put his lies in writing -he'll wind up on MSBC or write a book.
No Democrats ever get convicted in DC.. and then the text said it all
Click to expand...

A split jury brings back a hung jury…. Retrial. Must be unanimous to = not guilty
 
guno said:
The first courtroom test for Special Counsel John Durham ended in defeat Tuesday as a federal jury found a Democratic attorney not guilty of making a false statement to the FBI about allegations of computer links between Donald Trump and Russia.

The jury deliberated for about six hours before acquitting Michael Sussmann, 57, on the single felony charge he faced: that he lied when he allegedly denied he was acting on behalf of any client in alerting the FBI to claims that a secret server linked Trump and a Moscow bank with ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...AAXVzcz?cvid=a5eb5e6fe0374ae5b9c0f57947111053
Click to expand...
Unanimously
 
guno said:
The first courtroom test for Special Counsel John Durham ended in defeat Tuesday as a federal jury found a Democratic attorney not guilty of making a false statement to the FBI about allegations of computer links between Donald Trump and Russia.

The jury deliberated for about six hours before acquitting Michael Sussmann, 57, on the single felony charge he faced: that he lied when he allegedly denied he was acting on behalf of any client in alerting the FBI to claims that a secret server linked Trump and a Moscow bank with ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...AAXVzcz?cvid=a5eb5e6fe0374ae5b9c0f57947111053
Click to expand...

this only proves the corruption goes all the way to the top.

be careful what you wish for.

This just means they couldn't get sussman to take the fall.

this is only the beginning.

nothing can stop what is coming.
 
Cypress said:
The jury decision was unanimous. It strains the laws of statistics and probability to the breaking point that all 12 jurors were liberal partisan Democrats who were able to cleverly hide their biases from the prosecutors and Judge
Click to expand...
So now, in trump fashion, everyone should be claiming that Durham's loss proves that trump colluded with Russia.

Because he did, of course.
 
Lionfish said:
Did I ever say Sussman was guilty or innocent? I just found the connections with the Clintons to be interesting just as you would have if any of the Trumps were involved.
Click to expand...
This from the person who didn't find it interesting at all when trump pardoned a long list of felons.
 
Granule said:
No, he has a point. The whole Trump/Russia thing is total bullshit and you psychopaths expect Americans to believe that desperate piece of shit lawyer didn't lie to bury President Trump? lol
Click to expand...
Nope. It isn't. This verdict proves it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top