Trump Supporters Explain Why They Believe the Big Lie

What else is there to do but guess when you can't tell us nor document who conducted all these studies you keep referring to?

I linked to them shit stain. you having information bias anyway - you only accept what confirms your shitty world view
 
Thats the newest one they have come up with, but that was not Trumppers claim when the big lie first started.

Would PA and WI have changed the electoral winner?
two out of three that did in fact change the electoral winner......sucks to be stuck facing the reality of an unconstitutional president, doesn't it......
 
two out of three that did in fact change the electoral winner......sucks to be stuck facing the reality of an unconstitutional president, doesn't it......

He’s not unconstitutional, silly. What is the tired that in your insane mind put him over?
 
It's amazing how gullible some people are nowadays?!!

D7rPmmZX4AE-OmV.jpg


:dunno:
 
That is like saying the reason is because all the sane people were biased against Trump.

Trump was...and still is...a disgusting turd...a cancer on the body politic of America. His continuing supporters should start out again in kindergarten.

So they can be "re-educated" by the current indoctrination system in many places? Fuck off with that!

"There's 72 genders" Go fuck your mother with that shit.

And I know your mother was Italian, and I bet she was a saint so I don't really mean that, but wtf happened to you?

You're off the rails, Frank. They didn't have 72 genders when you or your mother were in kindergarten.

What's changed?
 
It's a cult view. On this site, I've seen arguments related to crowd sizes & lawn signs. Completely unscientific.

They're just upset they lost. Most voters are when their guys loses - but most voters move on. Trump has allowed his base to continue w/ the fantasy because he won't concede and continues to insist they have "massive evidence."

You saw more than that. you're just not admitting it.
 
but Frank - this is not anecdotal bullshit like you bring all the time. I linked to real studies showing you are wrong - Biden got the kid glove treatment - nearly no negatives were discussed.
View attachment 22359

Zymurgy...we both lived through the election...and the only people who think that Biden got "kid glove" treatment with nearly no negatives being discussed...are the fucking morons of the right.

You linked to bullshit.

Trump is one of the most disgusting individuals ever to live, let alone have a position as important as president of the United States. OF COURSE there was going to be more negative mentions of him. Fact is, there should have been even more than came.

Biden had plenty of negatives discussed. If you had tuned into FOX once in a while, y ou would have seen plenty.

Trump got his ass powerfully kicked by Biden because Trump was a HORRIBLE president...and thoroughly deserved to get his ass kicked as badly as it was...not because of the (perceived by the morons of the right) bias of the media.
 
So they can be "re-educated" by the current indoctrination system in many places? Fuck off with that!

"There's 72 genders" Go fuck your mother with that shit.

And I know your mother was Italian, and I bet she was a saint so I don't really mean that, but wtf happened to you?

You're off the rails, Frank. They didn't have 72 genders when you or your mother were in kindergarten.

What's changed?

I am not off the rails, Matt. I simply refuse to accept the absurdities that the people of the American right are willing to accept.

Take another look at the posting by Ken that I quoted above.

THINK ABOUT THAT!
 
unconstitutional elections in PA and WI......

You keep launching this futile and erroneous argument. The elections in those states are unconstitutional if and only if finally ruled as such by a court, eventually the SC. That didn't happen; Biden's victory in those states was legally confirmed. Even if they hadn't been confirmed and those electoral votes were deleted solely from Biden's total, which again would not have happened, he would still have the 270 necessary.
 
You keep launching this futile and erroneous argument. The elections in those states are unconstitutional if and only if finally ruled as such by a court, eventually the SC. That didn't happen

it did happen in PA and WI.........we've provided proof that in a dozen threads already........why do you keep pretending otherwise?.......
 
Back
Top