Blackburn: "Can you provide a definition for the word 'woman'?"

Status
Not open for further replies.
christiefan915 said:
Jackson: "I'm not a biologist." Too bad the Jackson-hating RWs think they are.

"[Rebecca]Jordan-Young, [a scientist and gender studies scholar at Barnard College whose work explores the relationships between science and the social hierarchies of gender and sexuality].said she sees Jackson's answer, particularly the second half, reflecting the necessity of nuance. While traditional notions of sex and gender suggest a simple binary – if you are born with a penis, you are male and identify as a man and if you are born with a vagina, you are female and identify as a woman – the reality, gender experts say, is more complex.

"There isn't one single 'biological' answer to the definition of a woman. There's not even a singular biological answer to the question of 'what is a female,'" Jordan-Young said.

There are at least six different biological markers of “sex” in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous, Jordan-Young said, and the different markers don’t always align.

Sarah Richardson, a Harvard scholar, historian and philosopher of biology who focuses on the sciences of sex and gender and their policy dimensions, said Jackson's answer accurately reflects legal practice. While U.S. law remains an unsettled arena for the conceptualization and definition of sex, it frequently grounds sex categorization in biological evidence and reasoning. But like Jordan-Young, Richardson emphasized that biology does not offer a simple or singular answer to the question of what defines a woman.

"As is so often the case, science cannot settle what are really social questions," she said. "In any particular case of sex categorization, whether in law or in science, it is necessary to build a definition of sex particular to context."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/m...theres-no-simple-answer/ar-AAVsjzf?li=BBnb7Kz
Click to expand...

What pile of ridiculous eye-wash !


Anyone with two functioning brain cells can define a woman.


Concentrate while I provide it for you.


A woman is person with two titties (preferably largish and pert) and a Hoo-Har (preferably shaved and quite tight).


See, it's easy-peasy !


Dachshund


DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !
 
Dachshund said:
What pile of ridiculous eye-wash !


Anyone with two functioning brain cells can define a woman.


Concentrate while I provide it for you.


A woman is person with two titties (preferably largish and pert) and a Hoo-Har (preferably shaved and quite tight).


See, it's easy-peasy !


Dachshund


DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !
Click to expand...

What about those women without tits?
 
Dachshund said:
They're called TRANNIES dufus !:palm:



Dachshund



DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !
Click to expand...

:palm:

noe_unders_collage_resized.jpg
 
AProudLefty said:
You are not good at Buddhism.

Think rainbow. It isn't "dual".
Click to expand...
Taoism -not Buddhism
and a rainbow is just refracted light. It's still just one thing.
The yin/yang would be the rain and sun that it's composed of
hot and searing together with cool and quenching are the characteristics of that yin/yang relationship
 
The yin yang (i.e. taijitu symbol) shows a balance between two opposites with a portion of the opposite element in each section. In Taoist metaphysics, distinctions between good and bad, along with other dichotomous moral judgments, are perceptual, not real; so, the duality of yin and yang is an indivisible whole.

According to Tao, everything has opposing sides from one another. Whether it be biological (boy/girl), physical (hot/cold), or moral (good/bad), the universe is full of opposites.
When these oppositions are combined, then existence is the result.
http://depts.washington.edu/triolive/quest/2007/TTQ07031/philosophy/taoism.html
 
christiefan915 said:
Jackson: "I'm not a biologist." Too bad the Jackson-hating RWs think they are.

"[Rebecca]Jordan-Young, [a scientist and gender studies scholar at Barnard College whose work explores the relationships between science and the social hierarchies of gender and sexuality].said she sees Jackson's answer, particularly the second half, reflecting the necessity of nuance. While traditional notions of sex and gender suggest a simple binary – if you are born with a penis, you are male and identify as a man and if you are born with a vagina, you are female and identify as a woman – the reality, gender experts say, is more complex.

"There isn't one single 'biological' answer to the definition of a woman. There's not even a singular biological answer to the question of 'what is a female,'" Jordan-Young said.

There are at least six different biological markers of “sex” in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous, Jordan-Young said, and the different markers don’t always align.

Sarah Richardson, a Harvard scholar, historian and philosopher of biology who focuses on the sciences of sex and gender and their policy dimensions, said Jackson's answer accurately reflects legal practice. While U.S. law remains an unsettled arena for the conceptualization and definition of sex, it frequently grounds sex categorization in biological evidence and reasoning. But like Jordan-Young, Richardson emphasized that biology does not offer a simple or singular answer to the question of what defines a woman.

"As is so often the case, science cannot settle what are really social questions," she said. "In any particular case of sex categorization, whether in law or in science, it is necessary to build a definition of sex particular to context."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/m...theres-no-simple-answer/ar-AAVsjzf?li=BBnb7Kz
Click to expand...
Why is it relevant?

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
Click to expand...

All laws of a general nature shall have uniform operation.
Click to expand...
 
AProudLefty said:
:palm:

noe_unders_collage_resized.jpg
Click to expand...

She is a pretty girl. I wouldn't say "NO" (if you know what I mean - wink, wink), even though she's a member of what we used to call the "ITTY, BITTY, TITTIE, COMMITTEE." Besides, although I prefer girls who are quite buxom, it's often the case that: "Small fish taste sweet.";););)

Note, Black Cat, that girl doesn't have "no tits" - just LITTLE tits.:palm:



Dachshund



DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !
 
Only fucking morons don't understand that the biological definition of a woman isn't the same as a legal one.
 
anatta said:
trannie aint women
they are physically different in terms of body muscle etc.
Click to expand...

that's true of most right wingers who self-identify as male, when they are tiny dicked eunuchs.

Transgender Student-Athlete Participation Policy
At its January 19, 2022 meeting, the NCAA Board of Governors updated the transgender student-athlete participation policy governing college sports.

The new policy aligns transgender student-athlete participation with the Olympic Movement (PDF). The resulting sport-by-sport approach preserves opportunity for transgender student-athletes while balancing fairness, inclusion and safety for all who compete.

Phase One – 2022 winter and spring championships
For participation in 2022 winter and spring championships, transgender student-athletes must provide documentation to the CSMAS within four weeks before the selections date for their championship.

The documentation must demonstrate compliance with the 2010 NCAA policy (PDF), which calls for one year of testosterone suppression treatment. It should also document a one-time serum testosterone level that falls below the maximum allowable level for the sport in which the student-athlete is competing within four weeks of championship selections for that sport. This means that student-athletes who have already fulfilled the 2010 NCAA policy need only provide one validated serum testosterone level in this time frame.

Transgender student-athletes who are participating in regular season competition (including conference championships) for the remainder of academic year 2022 remain subject to the 2010 NCAA policy only.

Phase Two – 2022-23 regular season and championships
Beginning Aug. 1, 2022, participation in NCAA sports requires transgender student-athletes to provide documentation that meets the above criteria for the 2010 NCAA policy (PDF), plus meet the sport standard for documented testosterone levels at the beginning of their competition season and again six months later. This means that student-athletes who have already been competing do not need to demonstrate the newly adapted sport-specific testosterone levels for the entire prior year if they are not available.

For participation in NCAA championships, transgender athletes must additionally provide documentation of testosterone levels to the CSMAS with laboratory work completed within four weeks of the championship selections.

Phase Three – 2023-24 full implementation
Beginning Aug. 1, 2023, participation in NCAA sports requires transgender student-athletes to provide documentation that meets the sport-specific standard submitted twice annually (once at the beginning of competition season and the second six months following) for one year. This process will continue annually for eligible student-athletes.

For participation in NCAA championships, transgender athletes must additionally provide documentation of testosterone levels to the CSMAS with laboratory work completed within four weeks of the championship selections
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top