Jackson, Biden's Supreme Court pick, refuses to define the word 'woman'
- Thread starter dukkha
- Start date
Fox Gnus, of course. CRT just recognized that the institutions are being corroded from the inside and do not give minorities equal rights or services. That is true. Racism has twisted the justice system, education and healthcare to provide worse opportunities for minorities. Why don't we fix that?
Hoosier Daddy
Verified User
embrace the concepts does not mean teach it, dumbshit clown. the overall concept of crt is valid. only an idiot can deny it.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Here's a thought, how about you read what Walter Myers has to say and go from there? To my mind the attempt to introduce a form of CRT in schools is akin to reeducation camps much beloved by despots in the past.
Last edited:
Okay, I will. And a thought for you, too. If 17 is the legal age for sex in certain US states, the UK etc., why did Prince Andrew need Jeffrey Epstein? He could have gone to any discreet, high-class bordello or even found willing teens in his large circle of friends and acquaintances.
Racist
cancel2 2022
Canceled
I hope you do rather than just cherry pick one sentence.
I read it. Surprisingly, I was with him until this: "CRT, I believe, is being specifically promoted in K-12 curriculums to layer on top of CT to form an outright Marxist approach, which seeks to transform and undermine traditional American values."
What a steaming load. It's typical fearmongering all over again. The RW hook in every article they write is how those damn liberal are going to destroy America, and the gullible swallow it every time.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Here is a an article by Dan Wootton about him, he's had his pick of elegant beautiful women so I very much doubt that he needed Epstein as a pimp as you're implying.
Prince Andrew ‘has had more than 1,000 lovers’ but does not sleep with teenagers, close friends claim
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9787493/prince-andrew-slept-with-1000-women/
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Sorry but that seems to be eminently reasonable to me, that's exactly what so-called Progressives wants to do. Scoff all you wish but it's grounded in reality, in my humble opinion. I would also point out that classical liberalism is a world away from what Progressives advocate, but I doubt that you'll agree with that either.
I'm a liberal Democrat and some have called me a progressive. I'm not a Marxist or a commie. I'd like to hear the RW definition of "traditional American values" because they change over time.
Agreed they are fear-mongering. It's dishonest to fear-monger.
Look at how many RWNJs are hooked by CRT but still can't explain why it's bad because they only know the fear, not the reality.
so you didn't want it banned. state purview to do so. Now you differentiate between the "fear"
-which I assume is the teaching sane Americans of all races "fear" -their children being called oppressed or oppressor because of their skin color.
-and then you toss in us ignorant Deplorables can't explain our reasoning
what is your "reality" you speak of?
There then is something about CRT you must find acceptable if the rest of the Deplorable find it completely horrible
In terms of CRT/1619 Project it is a complete standing on the head claiming of the USA founded to protect slavery. Not religious freedom or taxation without representation.. nope -slavery
Then there is the part about equity being the only solution. since everything is "systemic racist"
Or many Constitutional requirements being treated as optional niceties, that's the definition of "American values
BidenPresident
Verified User
Ban something you can't even explain what it is? No, this isn't fucking Russia, Comrade Dookie. Go back to your watery borscht.
your brain went down the drain
~~
CRT is well explained -so much it's a law school course
The 1619 Project is a long-form journalism endeavor developed by Nikole Hannah-Jones, writers from The New York Times, and The New York Times Magazine which "aims to reframe the country's history by placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of Black Americans at the very center of the United States' .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_1619_Project
-->You are an ignorant troll - that much is easily explained
Why did Trump need Epstein? They were getting carefully selected young girls. Trump said " Epstein like them young. even younger than I do".In theory, the rich could be abusive on a private island without rules.
That's the antebellum South.
1619 says the entire country's very founding was to protect slavery
Not the Declaration , not religious freedom like Pilgrims, not "taxation without representation"
or the Federalist papers....Slavery is the reason and 1619 is the true founding