Conservatives want to reverse Griswold v. CT, making birth control illegal

Wrong! If it were an equal justice, the man involved would have an equal say. After all, if the woman decides to have the child, he's on the hook for child support. Why shouldn't he have a say in an abortion too?

If it did not directly affect the health and body of the woman only, I would agree.
 
HER BODY IS NOT BEING KILLED ,IS IT??


JUST THE BABY'S IS....DID SHE HAVE CARELESS, CONSENSUAL SEX ,AS IN 99% OF "UNWANTED PREGNANCIES" ??


WHY SHOULD THE CHILD'S LIFE BE FORFEIT??


SHE CAN GIVE HIM/HER UP FOR ADOPTION.....

Not a baby.
 
Conservatives want to turn the clock back to 1953...

Roe v. Wade is first (end legal abortion)

Obergefell v. Hodges is next (end gay marriage)

Griswold v. Connecticut is third (end legal birth control)

Brown v. Board of Education is the ultimate target. (re-institute segregation)

Here's Conservative Mike Braun saying that states should be able to ban interracial marriage, in case any moderate BoTHSiDeRiSt doubts what the GOP's intent really is:

 
How many abortions did you have, you must feel such shame!
That is human life,
and because i have the right to defend myself!

So after Big Mouth here faceplanted and incorrectly identified a cat fetus as a human fetus, he has suddenly abandoned this thread.

Not hard to figure out why.

Humiliation is a powerful weapon to wield against Conservatism.
 
Back
Top