Republicans Falsely Accuse Biden’s Supreme Court Pick Of Going Easy On Sex Offenders

G

gemini104104

Verified User
Sewer dwelling gutter trolls should consider the following details versus their lies and bullshit against a fully qualified SCOTUS Justice candidate who is far more qualified than what tRump and his seditious repukes dumped on SCOTUS in violation of U.S. Constitutional law:

Republicans Falsely Accuse Biden’s Supreme Court Pick Of Going Easy On Sex Offenders
Ketanji Brown Jackson’s record on cases involving sex offenses is backed by research well within the mainstream.

In a thinly sourced Twitter thread on Thursday, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) made a series of inflammatory attacks against Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is President Joe Biden’s nominee for the Supreme Court and currently a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

The tweets dealt with some of Jackson’s past statements on sex offender registries and civil commitment, as well as her views on mandatory minimums. He claimed, without evidence, that Jackson “has a pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes, both as a judge and as a policymaker.”

It was a preview of a tactic Republicans will likely deploy next week when Jackson testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee, of which Hawley is a member. But despite his claim that she is soft on sex offenses, nothing is particularly unusual about her judgments in such cases.

“I’m concerned that this is a record that endangers our children,” Hawley tweeted Thursday, in a thread that contained out-of-context screenshots of Jackson’s past statements and no links to the underlying material he was criticizing."

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/repu...kson-supreme-court_n_6234b708e4b019fd812d8aab
 
gemini104104 said:
Sewer dwelling gutter trolls should consider the following details versus their lies and bullshit against a fully qualified SCOTUS Justice candidate who is far more qualified than what tRump and his seditious repukes dumped on SCOTUS in violation of U.S. Constitutional law:

Republicans Falsely Accuse Biden’s Supreme Court Pick Of Going Easy On Sex Offenders
Ketanji Brown Jackson’s record on cases involving sex offenses is backed by research well within the mainstream.

In a thinly sourced Twitter thread on Thursday, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) made a series of inflammatory attacks against Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is President Joe Biden’s nominee for the Supreme Court and currently a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

The tweets dealt with some of Jackson’s past statements on sex offender registries and civil commitment, as well as her views on mandatory minimums. He claimed, without evidence, that Jackson “has a pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes, both as a judge and as a policymaker.”

It was a preview of a tactic Republicans will likely deploy next week when Jackson testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee, of which Hawley is a member. But despite his claim that she is soft on sex offenses, nothing is particularly unusual about her judgments in such cases.

“I’m concerned that this is a record that endangers our children,” Hawley tweeted Thursday, in a thread that contained out-of-context screenshots of Jackson’s past statements and no links to the underlying material he was criticizing."

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/repu...kson-supreme-court_n_6234b708e4b019fd812d8aab
Click to expand...

^
wharrgarbl-wharrogarbl-wharrgarbl-22632848.png
 
is it false?........it is based upon the sentences she gave in 9 out of 9 of the cases she dealt with while a judge, all BELOW the recommended minimum sentence for federal judges.....on the other hand, your position is based upon the opinion of a HuffPost editorial......
 
Last edited:
The sentencing guidelines for child porn were out of whack. She was giving sentences which were totally in line with what other judges were doing.

"But in terms of her own work, I mean, I fully expect that she will talk about the child pornography sentences. And I think she will have Romney to give the context. Now, these senators have 30 minutes for — each senator has 30 minutes for questioning. So she should be given the time to explain what was happening with sentencing and child pornography that led to more lenient sentences, as most other federal judges were doing, because, at the time, those sentences were perceived as too tough and a mess.

And the Sentencing Commission was struggling at the time with trying to work all that out. So, she was not out of the mainstream."

PBS Newshour
 
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO):

"And what concerns me, and I have been very candid about this, is that, in every case, in each of these seven, Judge Jackson handed down a lenient sentence that was below what the federal guidelines recommended and below what prosecutors requested."



The 7 cases involved child porn.
 
PoliTalker said:
The sentencing guidelines for child porn were out of whack. She was giving sentences which were totally in line with what other judges were doing.

"But in terms of her own work, I mean, I fully expect that she will talk about the child pornography sentences. And I think she will have Romney to give the context. Now, these senators have 30 minutes for — each senator has 30 minutes for questioning. So she should be given the time to explain what was happening with sentencing and child pornography that led to more lenient sentences, as most other federal judges were doing, because, at the time, those sentences were perceived as too tough and a mess.

And the Sentencing Commission was struggling at the time with trying to work all that out. So, she was not out of the mainstream."

PBS Newshour
Click to expand...

Total BS.

She is soft on child porn violators.
 
She is going to be an awesome and fair addition to the SCOTUS.

She will bring a perspective previously unseen.

There is no Justice with any public defender experience.

Soon, there will be.

If only Ginsburg had done what Breyer has...
 
Earl said:
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO):

"And what concerns me, and I have been very candid about this, is that, in every case, in each of these seven, Judge Jackson handed down a lenient sentence that was below what the federal guidelines recommended and below what prosecutors requested."



The 7 cases involved child porn.
Click to expand...

Josh Hawley blows little boys in church. He's also a traitor who deserves 20 years to Life of assfucking in ADX Florence.
 
gemini104104 said:
Sewer dwelling gutter trolls should consider the following details versus their lies and bullshit against a fully qualified SCOTUS Justice candidate who is far more qualified than what tRump and his seditious repukes dumped on SCOTUS in violation of U.S. Constitutional law:

Republicans Falsely Accuse Biden’s Supreme Court Pick Of Going Easy On Sex Offenders
Ketanji Brown Jackson’s record on cases involving sex offenses is backed by research well within the mainstream.

In a thinly sourced Twitter thread on Thursday, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) made a series of inflammatory attacks against Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is President Joe Biden’s nominee for the Supreme Court and currently a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

The tweets dealt with some of Jackson’s past statements on sex offender registries and civil commitment, as well as her views on mandatory minimums. He claimed, without evidence, that Jackson “has a pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes, both as a judge and as a policymaker.”

It was a preview of a tactic Republicans will likely deploy next week when Jackson testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee, of which Hawley is a member. But despite his claim that she is soft on sex offenses, nothing is particularly unusual about her judgments in such cases.

“I’m concerned that this is a record that endangers our children,” Hawley tweeted Thursday, in a thread that contained out-of-context screenshots of Jackson’s past statements and no links to the underlying material he was criticizing."

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/repu...kson-supreme-court_n_6234b708e4b019fd812d8aab
Click to expand...

liar!

In three cases, Affirmative Action Jackson gave Bidenite kiddie porn purveyors the most lenient sentence permitted by law:



1. Bidenite distributed multiple images of child porn, possessed dozens more, including Bidenite videos:

Federal sentencing guidelines: 97-121 months in prison.
Prosecutors recommended 24 months in prison.
Affirmative Action Jackson gave the revolting Bidenite just three months in prison.




2. Bidenite possessed 48 files filled with disgusting Bidenite child pornography:

Federal guidelines: 78-97 months in prison
Prosecutor recommended the same (78-97 months)
Affirmative Action Jackson sentenced the guilty Bidenite to only 28 months





3. Bidenite distributed dozens of images of Bidenite child pornography, possessed over six hundred more:

Federal guidelines: 151-188 months in prison
Prosecutor recommended 72 months
Affirmative Action Jackson gave the criminal Bidenite defendant the lowest sentence permitted by law (60 months)





4. Bidenite distributed 33 graphic images and videos of Bidenite child sexual assault on anonymous messaging app:

Federal guidelines: 70-87 months in prison
Prosecutor recommended 70 months in prison
Affirmative Action Jackson sentenced the low-life Bidenite to the most lenient sentence permitted by law




5. Bidenite distributed scores of images and children suffering Bidenite sexual abuse:

Federal guidelines: 97-121 months in prison
Prosecutor recommended 97 months in prison
Affirmative Action Jackson shaved the filthy Bidenite's jail time by 40 month






6. Bidenite distributed over a hundred videos of vile Bidenite child pornography:

Guidelines: 97-121 months in prison
Prosecution recommended 97 months
Affirmative Action Jackson gave the perverted Bidenite only 71 months




7. Bidenite was convicted of traveling across state lines to engage in Bidenite sexual intercourse with a child and also possessed six separate thumb drives of Bidenite child pornography:

Guidelines: 46-57 months in prison
Prosecutor recommended 49 months
Affirmative Action Jackson cut the nasty Bidenite's sentence to 37 months
 
PoliTalker said:
The sentencing guidelines for child porn were out of whack. She was giving sentences which were totally in line with what other judges were doing.

"But in terms of her own work, I mean, I fully expect that she will talk about the child pornography sentences. And I think she will have Romney to give the context. Now, these senators have 30 minutes for — each senator has 30 minutes for questioning. So she should be given the time to explain what was happening with sentencing and child pornography that led to more lenient sentences, as most other federal judges were doing, because, at the time, those sentences were perceived as too tough and a mess.

And the Sentencing Commission was struggling at the time with trying to work all that out. So, she was not out of the mainstream."

PBS Newshour
Click to expand...

Correct anything other than death is too lenient gutter snipe!
 
Wolverine said:
liar!

In three cases, Affirmative Action Jackson gave Bidenite kiddie porn purveyors the most lenient sentence permitted by law:



1. Bidenite distributed multiple images of child porn, possessed dozens more, including Bidenite videos:

Federal sentencing guidelines: 97-121 months in prison.
Prosecutors recommended 24 months in prison.
Affirmative Action Jackson gave the revolting Bidenite just three months in prison.




2. Bidenite possessed 48 files filled with disgusting Bidenite child pornography:

Federal guidelines: 78-97 months in prison
Prosecutor recommended the same (78-97 months)
Affirmative Action Jackson sentenced the guilty Bidenite to only 28 months





3. Bidenite distributed dozens of images of Bidenite child pornography, possessed over six hundred more:

Federal guidelines: 151-188 months in prison
Prosecutor recommended 72 months
Affirmative Action Jackson gave the criminal Bidenite defendant the lowest sentence permitted by law (60 months)





4. Bidenite distributed 33 graphic images and videos of Bidenite child sexual assault on anonymous messaging app:

Federal guidelines: 70-87 months in prison
Prosecutor recommended 70 months in prison
Affirmative Action Jackson sentenced the low-life Bidenite to the most lenient sentence permitted by law




5. Bidenite distributed scores of images and children suffering Bidenite sexual abuse:

Federal guidelines: 97-121 months in prison
Prosecutor recommended 97 months in prison
Affirmative Action Jackson shaved the filthy Bidenite's jail time by 40 month






6. Bidenite distributed over a hundred videos of vile Bidenite child pornography:

Guidelines: 97-121 months in prison
Prosecution recommended 97 months
Affirmative Action Jackson gave the perverted Bidenite only 71 months




7. Bidenite was convicted of traveling across state lines to engage in Bidenite sexual intercourse with a child and also possessed six separate thumb drives of Bidenite child pornography:

Guidelines: 46-57 months in prison
Prosecutor recommended 49 months
Affirmative Action Jackson cut the nasty Bidenite's sentence to 37 months
Click to expand...

Should all pedophiles be executed or imprisoned for life?

5c72sm.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top