House Democrats Push Biden to Build a Better Midterm Message

B

BidenPresident

Verified User
WASHINGTON — After offering her customary lavish praise of President Biden, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi got to the business at hand at a White House meeting last month on the midterm elections.

Democrats, Ms. Pelosi told Mr. Biden and a group of his aides, need a more succinct and consistent message. The speaker, who has long been fond of pithy, made-for-bumper-sticker mantras, offered a suggestion she had heard from members: Democrats deliver.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/12/us/politics/biden-pelosi-democrats-midterm-elections.html
 
BidenPresident said:
WASHINGTON — After offering her customary lavish praise of President Biden, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi got to the business at hand at a White House meeting last month on the midterm elections.

Democrats, Ms. Pelosi told Mr. Biden and a group of his aides, need a more succinct and consistent message. The speaker, who has long been fond of pithy, made-for-bumper-sticker mantras, offered a suggestion she had heard from members: Democrats deliver.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/12/us/politics/biden-pelosi-democrats-midterm-elections.html
Click to expand...

Yes. Democrats have delivered record high gas prices, inflation, foreign policy catastrophes, soaring violent crime rates, etc.

Pres.Moron "succinct"? :rofl2::rofl2:
 
Demmycrats deliver.....

.....Afghanistan to the Taliban
.....Ukraine to Russia
.....Iranian and Venezuelan oil to America
.....inflation to all of us
 
What better midterm message can he deliver? That he's resigning because of health issues and Harris is taking over? That's a train wreck. That he's taking responsibility for everything being fucked up? That's a train wreck.

As for a message like "Democrats deliver," that'd become a meme in a nanosecond.

detroit-michigan-abandoned-buildings-7.jpg


Slap "Democrats deliver" on that, and it's gold...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
What better midterm message can he deliver? That he's resigning because of health issues and Harris is taking over? That's a train wreck. That he's taking responsibility for everything being fucked up? That's a train wreck.

As for a message like "Democrats deliver," that'd become a meme in a nanosecond.

detroit-michigan-abandoned-buildings-7.jpg


Slap "Democrats deliver" on that, and it's gold...
Click to expand...

duhhh dems bad duhhh
 
BidenPresident said:
WASHINGTON — After offering her customary lavish praise of President Biden, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi got to the business at hand at a White House meeting last month on the midterm elections.

Democrats, Ms. Pelosi told Mr. Biden and a group of his aides, need a more succinct and consistent message. The speaker, who has long been fond of pithy, made-for-bumper-sticker mantras, offered a suggestion she had heard from members: Democrats deliver.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/12/us/politics/biden-pelosi-democrats-midterm-elections.html
Click to expand...
The Red Tsunami is coming. It cannot be avoided.
 
ExpressLane said:
The Red Tsunami is coming. It cannot be avoided.
Click to expand...

There is a reasonable chance of a red ripple in 2022, and that could tip the tide of power, but a red tsunami is impossible.

Republicans are talking about winning enough Senate seats to remove Biden, which would be 67 seats. To have 67 seats, they would need to win 38 out of 35 Senate elections. Do you see a problem with that?
 
ExpressLane said:
The Red Tsunami is coming. It cannot be avoided.
Click to expand...

There is a reasonable chance of a red ripple in 2022, and that could tip the tide of power, but a red tsunami is impossible.

Republicans are talking about winning enough Senate seats to remove Biden, which would be 67 seats. To have 67 seats, they would need to win 38 out of 35 Senate elections. Do you see a problem with that?
 
Walt said:
There is a reasonable chance of a red ripple in 2022, and that could tip the tide of power, but a red tsunami is impossible.

Republicans are talking about winning enough Senate seats to remove Biden, which would be 67 seats. To have 67 seats, they would need to win 38 out of 35 Senate elections. Do you see a problem with that?
Click to expand...

I figure the House will be massively turned Red. Senate? I suspect 4 to 5 in the Republican's favor. That's short of 60 but enough to make it possible with a couple of Democrats to get anything through.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I figure the House will be massively turned Red. Senate? I suspect 4 to 5 in the Republican's favor. That's short of 60 but enough to make it possible with a couple of Democrats to get anything through.
Click to expand...

Only 14 Democratic Senate seats are up for election. To win 5 of them, Republicans would have to win 26 out of 35 elections, or almost three quarters of them. All this with candidates who are constantly being stuck in scandals.

As for the House, gerrymandering can only get you so far. Republicans may win the majority, but not by much... And that is just a maybe, and assuming all their gerrymandering works out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top