Unintended Consequences

Who's benefitting from Bidenflation and the open border, other than the 1%?

Most of the 1% are Republican supporters. Walmart, Home Deport and construction companies like fat boy Stone's benefit from "cheap labor". What's cheaper than charging for full price workers then giving illegals half to a third and pocketing the rest? Works even better if half the workforce are illegals being paid under the table.

Of course, like with Stone, if the IRS takes a hard enough look, he'll go down for millions of dollars worth of tax evasion charges. It'll collapse the company and see him become someone's bitch buddy for a few years.

People who engage in risky behavior, and succeed, often put themselves into a situation where they do not. It's akin to the Peter Principle except with more life altering consequences.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00102/full
theorists have argued that the particular combination of contextual factors, accessibility to content of decision-making utility, task type and demands, and computational skills trigger a particular type of behavioral response – normatively rational or irrational risky behavior...

...Summary
According to normative theory, any information that is not directly used to calculate the expected values of the decision options should not influence the choices. However, variables such as differences in contextual descriptions of risk, monetary amounts, and – importantly, as we have shown – accessibility to decision-making content (e.g., activated emotions) change risk preferences and choices (e.g., Kusev et al., 2009). There is strong empirical support for the effects of emotions on risky behavior (e.g., Guven, 2012). People are not slaves to their emotions, however, with emotional regulation strategies associated having effects on affective, social and cognitive functioning, and psychological well-being (John and Gross, 2004). There are several key hormonal correlates and determinants of risk. Cortisol, testosterone, and oxytocin have been demonstrated to be causally involved in modulating risky behavior. Chronic sustained elevation of cortisol serves to make people more risk averse, whereas both administered and naturally high testosterone increases risky behavior. Oxytocin appears to increase generosity in a manner resembling risk-aversion, but more study is needed to add confidence to this interpretation. The influence of cognitive, emotional, and hormonal factors and their interaction on decision-making have implications for regulation to improve people’s decision-making.
 
LOL It really pains you to see your hero besmirched, doesn't it Callie? LOL

It's long been an American tradition to bitch about the President and Congress...until 2016 when it became verboten by people like you. Go figure.


I don't have many heroes, and Trump is not on that list. In fact, there are no politicians on that list, not even Reagan. So besmirch away. And I fully understand the American tradition of bitching about the president and congress, I do it myself, but Trump is not the president. 'Tater head is. So before you yammer away with what you think are these witty homophobic metaphors, have a fucking take on the serious side of the issue. What did Trump do, specifically and in reality, to make you think he was enabling putin? In other words, what was Trump getting in exchange for all the blow jobs?

And you really should take a good look at that peach of a "president" you "elected". He wrote the book on political suckage.
 
Of course, the JPP MAGA crowd has barely been able to contain their excitement about Putin's war impacting the American economy. But what is really happening? I see a split in the GOP.

Notably, JD Vance, one of the biggest GOP phonies, and that's saying something, said he doesn't give one fuck about Ukraine. But oh, wait, days later, and now he does care deeply about Ukraine.

The insurrectionist, Josh Howley, suddenly came out against the invasion yesterday.

Fifth Columnist, Tucker Carlson, last night said Putin must be punished.

So what's really happening?

Trump is still sucking Putin cock, and many of his MAGA traitors are doing the same. Traitors like Flynn, and Bannon of course, and some elected GOP crazies, along with other crazies running for office on the GOP ticket.

Just how much Putin cock are American voters able to stomach sucking?

Remember every time you point a finger there's three more pointing back at you. I see a GOP split, and I see trouble. Because Trump, called upon to make a personal sacrifice, will always choose to sacrifice the world instead. The world. So sacrificing the GOP is a very small ask for him.

Let's see just how well the GOP does with Putin's boy Trump out there in the midterms, and then 2024 looms.

Dems in disarray? Who's really in disarray? Remember Lindsey Graham, back before Daddy McCain died and so he still had some guts, said that if the GOP elected trump the party would be destroyed, and they would deserve it. Not every train arrives on time. But eventually, they still come down that track. Laugh now, cry later. A tale as old as time.

Fuck off, leftist stooge. You and your ilk are exactly what's wrong with America today.
 
Most of the 1% are Republican supporters. Walmart, Home Deport and construction companies like fat boy Stone's benefit from "cheap labor". What's cheaper than charging for full price workers then giving illegals half to a third and pocketing the rest? Works even better if half the workforce are illegals being paid under the table.

Of course, like with Stone, if the IRS takes a hard enough look, he'll go down for millions of dollars worth of tax evasion charges. It'll collapse the company and see him become someone's bitch buddy for a few years.

People who engage in risky behavior, and succeed, often put themselves into a situation where they do not. It's akin to the Peter Principle except with more life altering consequences.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00102/full
theorists have argued that the particular combination of contextual factors, accessibility to content of decision-making utility, task type and demands, and computational skills trigger a particular type of behavioral response – normatively rational or irrational risky behavior...

...Summary
According to normative theory, any information that is not directly used to calculate the expected values of the decision options should not influence the choices. However, variables such as differences in contextual descriptions of risk, monetary amounts, and – importantly, as we have shown – accessibility to decision-making content (e.g., activated emotions) change risk preferences and choices (e.g., Kusev et al., 2009). There is strong empirical support for the effects of emotions on risky behavior (e.g., Guven, 2012). People are not slaves to their emotions, however, with emotional regulation strategies associated having effects on affective, social and cognitive functioning, and psychological well-being (John and Gross, 2004). There are several key hormonal correlates and determinants of risk. Cortisol, testosterone, and oxytocin have been demonstrated to be causally involved in modulating risky behavior. Chronic sustained elevation of cortisol serves to make people more risk averse, whereas both administered and naturally high testosterone increases risky behavior. Oxytocin appears to increase generosity in a manner resembling risk-aversion, but more study is needed to add confidence to this interpretation. The influence of cognitive, emotional, and hormonal factors and their interaction on decision-making have implications for regulation to improve people’s decision-making.

Corporations contribute to both parties every cycle. This was especially true when the Business Round Table, Rotary, Barons, etc. were running the GOP. Now that it's Trump's party, and wokism has been invading the corporate world, that may start to change for several election cycles.
 
Sounds like the Marxists have reached even you dear boy.

No one benefits from Marxism, unless you consider death and suffering to be beneficial. The whole reason why our society is built upon equality (rather than equity) is our strong sense of fairness and the belief that people will benefit from it.
 
I don't have many heroes, and Trump is not on that list. In fact, there are no politicians on that list, not even Reagan. So besmirch away. And I fully understand the American tradition of bitching about the president and congress, I do it myself, but Trump is not the president. 'Tater head is. So before you yammer away with what you think are these witty homophobic metaphors, have a fucking take on the serious side of the issue. What did Trump do, specifically and in reality, to make you think he was enabling putin? In other words, what was Trump getting in exchange for all the blow jobs?

And you really should take a good look at that peach of a "president" you "elected". He wrote the book on political suckage.
Awesome! Me too!!!

Which President are you accusing me of electing? You already know I've voted Republican in every election up to Romney except for Perot. Since then, only Libertarian since neither D or R had my vote. Why are you a Trump die hard?
 
Awesome! Me too!!!

Which President are you accusing me of electing? You already know I've voted Republican in every election up to Romney except for Perot. Since then, only Libertarian since neither D or R had my vote. Why are you a Trump die hard?

You didn't vote for Perot, faggot? I did. :tongout:

Why were you an establishment stooge? Owait..you still are, nevermind...
 
Corporations contribute to both parties every cycle. This was especially true when the Business Round Table, Rotary, Barons, etc. were running the GOP. Now that it's Trump's party, and wokism has been invading the corporate world, that may start to change for several election cycles.

What are you predicting that change to be?
 
You didn't vote for Perot, faggot? I did. :tongout:

Why were you an establishment stooge? Owait..you still are, nevermind...

I did vote for Perot, Matt. Because I did, fucking Clinton won. If ranked voting was allowed, Bush would have won.

How 1960s hippieish of you. Establishment stooge? Yes, Matt, I've worked for "the Man" for decades, but it seems strange to me you are anti-capitalism. You're not a commie so you must be a National Socialist. A Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, yes?
 
No one benefits from Marxism, unless you consider death and suffering to be beneficial. The whole reason why our society is built upon equality (rather than equity) is our strong sense of fairness and the belief that people will benefit from it.
Contemporary Conservatism is hardly known for being either fair or generous.
 
Of course, the JPP MAGA crowd has barely been able to contain their excitement about Putin's war impacting the American economy. But what is really happening? I see a split in the GOP.

Notably, JD Vance, one of the biggest GOP phonies, and that's saying something, said he doesn't give one fuck about Ukraine. But oh, wait, days later, and now he does care deeply about Ukraine.

The insurrectionist, Josh Howley, suddenly came out against the invasion yesterday.

Fifth Columnist, Tucker Carlson, last night said Putin must be punished.

So what's really happening?

Trump is still sucking Putin cock, and many of his MAGA traitors are doing the same. Traitors like Flynn, and Bannon of course, and some elected GOP crazies, along with other crazies running for office on the GOP ticket.

Just how much Putin cock are American voters able to stomach sucking?

Remember every time you point a finger there's three more pointing back at you. I see a GOP split, and I see trouble. Because Trump, called upon to make a personal sacrifice, will always choose to sacrifice the world instead. The world. So sacrificing the GOP is a very small ask for him.

Let's see just how well the GOP does with Putin's boy Trump out there in the midterms, and then 2024 looms.

Dems in disarray? Who's really in disarray? Remember Lindsey Graham, back before Daddy McCain died and so he still had some guts, said that if the GOP elected trump the party would be destroyed, and they would deserve it. Not every train arrives on time. But eventually, they still come down that track. Laugh now, cry later. A tale as old as time.

Biden already fucked up the economy. That's exactly where the blame lies.
 
I did vote for Perot, Matt. Because I did, fucking Clinton won. If ranked voting was allowed, Bush would have won.

How 1960s hippieish of you. Establishment stooge? Yes, Matt, I've worked for "the Man" for decades, but it seems strange to me you are anti-capitalism. You're not a commie so you must be a National Socialist. A Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, yes?

That's a false dilemna fallacy

"False Dilemma or False Dichotomy is a formal fallacy based on an “either-or” type of argument. Two choices are presented, when more might exist, and the claim is made that one is false and one is true - or one is acceptable and the other is not. Often, there are other alternatives which haven’t been considered, or both choices might be false or true."
https://www.logical-fallacy.com/articles/false-dilemma/

You think in a myopic box, Dutch. That's why you'll never understand.

I am very pro-capitalism. Capitalism without government restraints for the most part is best.

You know, like assholes cracking down on a little girl for running a lemonade stand on the weekends..that's fucked up, IMO.

Because she didn't have a business license. :palm:

PS: I loathe fuckin' dirty hippies, idk even why. Been that way for decades.

Dirty Hippies don't run lemonade stands. That's too entrepeneurial for them
 
Last edited:
"False Dilemma or False Dichotomy is a formal fallacy based on an “either-or” type of argument. Two choices are presented, when more might exist, and the claim is made that one is false and one is true - or one is acceptable and the other is not. Often, there are other alternatives which haven’t been considered, or both choices might be false or true."
https://www.logical-fallacy.com/articles/false-dilemma/

You think in a myopic box, Dutch. That's why you'll never understand.

I am very pro-capitalism. Capitalism without government restraints for the most part is best.

You know, like assholes cracking down on a little girl for running a lemonade stand on the weekends..that's fucked up, IMO.

Because she didn't have a business license. :palm:

Jesus, Matt. A little early to be shit faced, dude...or is this just you unmedicated? LOL Sorry, but the 1992 Presidential election was not a "False Dilemma". Did you really even vote in it?

God bless capitalism. WTF does that have to do with Perot or your commie hatred of the US government?

You didn't vote for Perot, faggot? I did. :tongout:

Why were you an establishment stooge? Owait..you still are, nevermind...
 
Jesus, Matt. A little early to be shit faced, dude...or is this just you unmedicated? LOL Sorry, but the 1992 Presidential election was not a "False Dilemma". Did you really even vote in it?

God bless capitalism. WTF does that have to do with Perot or your commie hatred of the US government?

I voted for Perot because he was the best candidate and I'm no commie, establishment stooge.

Who were the choices then? Clinton or Gore? Wait..Who was the Republican choice? Dole? Was that the year? I know I voted for Perot, he had his head screwed on straight.
 
I voted for Perot because he was the best candidate and I'm no commie, establishment stooge.

The phrase used by late 1960 hippie radicals against anyone who worked for or with any government agency at any level. Like Antifa, they are anarchists.

You've tipped your hand, Matt.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/05/how-trump-became-an-establishment-stooge
HOW TRUMP BECAME AN ESTABLISHMENT STOOGE
Without a populist army inside Washington, Trump settles for delivering establishment wins
 
The phrase used by late 1960 hippie radicals against anyone who worked for or with any government agency at any level. Like Antifa, they are anarchists.

You've tipped your hand, Matt.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/05/how-trump-became-an-establishment-stooge
HOW TRUMP BECAME AN ESTABLISHMENT STOOGE
Without a populist army inside Washington, Trump settles for delivering establishment wins

As always, you're a delusional fucktard, Dutch! It is what it is.

With your commie link to leftist propaganda.
 
Back
Top