Not when you were answering what I said you weren't.
What?
Not when you were answering what I said you weren't.
It is not clear… you just claim I don’t understand. What do you think I’m wrong about?
You are backed into a corner and can’t get out so you make vague claims that I don’t understand and try to leave it at that!
Read Miranda v Arizoma so you can find out where the Supreme Court found it. Your law school should be embarrassed.
Miranda deals with your rights “when interrogated while in police custody”.
It is clear to everyone but you. It started with you pretending it could be taken as guilt. Then when you agreed no lawyer should say it you used the "he did it first" argument of a four year old not realizing that it is a confession rather than an excuse.
Pretty much every action in the thread where you acted like Trump is the moment you made it clear you thought some rights only apply to folks you agree with.
It also flows from the 5th. Your right not to incriminate yourself is your right to silence.
I never said “it” could be taken as guilt.
You as a Lawyer should know Its a legal maneuver it does not infer guilt. Its been used by Democrats like Lois Lerner many time. So big deal councilor.‘If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth?’ - Defeated Former President about to take the Fifth again!
AbsolutelyNot directly, but you certainly inferred it. I chastised, you tried more excuses that were really confessions and finally landed on... Trump's a hypocrite! And I simply pointed.out that any lawyer implying guilt from silence would be chastised and possibly censured by the court. You continued to argue nonsense and try to infer guilt... waaay later you decided to pretend you never did because you were shamed into it.
Not directly, but you certainly inferred it. I chastised, you tried more excuses that were really confessions and finally landed on... Trump's a hypocrite! And I simply pointed.out that any lawyer implying guilt from silence would be chastised and possibly censured by the court. You continued to argue nonsense and try to infer guilt... waaay later you decided to pretend you never did because you were shamed into it.
Bull. Why even start a thread about a common legal strategy? Its like saying Trump hired a lawyer. Big deal.You simply took an inference that was not there.
Now you got me reading the thread back to you when I said I wouldn't. I'll let it go from here. Say whatever makes you feel better about yourself. I learned a bunch about you in this thread, some of it was surprising to me.
Bull. Why even start a thread about a common legal strategy? Its like saying Trump hired a lawyer. Big deal.
He also says dumb crap like "Why are you pleading the fifth?" when he knows that if he was Trump's attorney he would tell him to shut up regardless of guilt or innocence.
Funny how Jarod never gets anything legal right nor when asked a direct legal question does he answer. All of the sudden he runs silent, runs deep.
Because that is a lie, and if I was an attorney I might lose my license by making a mockery of the judicial system.
actually, you can use it in a civil case if answering might subject you to criminal prosecution.........
He is bad at playing them.He does it to play mind games, it's nothing new.

Bull. Why even start a thread about a common legal strategy? Its like saying Trump hired a lawyer. Big deal.