The Key Question for Trumps criminality...

[Jarod]

Nah, who cares what a bunch of slime bag dope pushers think.

Congress can go suck an egg.

I mean, if no one can even be brought to examine the evidence, i cant see their proceedings were lawful to begin with.

Supposed insurrection = people jay walking to stop a mugging.

Then you are a fool.

 

[signalmankenneth]

"Did Donald Trump, through action or inaction, corruptly seek to obstruct or impede Congress’ official proceeding to count electoral votes?”

If there is strong evidence the answer to this is yes, Trump should serve time.

 

[Grokmaster]

"Did Donald Trump, through action or inaction, corruptly seek to obstruct or impede Congress’ official proceeding to count electoral votes?”

If there is strong evidence the answer to this is yes, Trump should serve time.

PROVE IT...OR STFU.


NO ONE GIVES A FUCK ABOUT JAN 6; AMERICANS CARE ABOUT HOW YOU AND YOURS ARE MASSIVELY FUCKING UP THE COUNTRY THEY LOVE....

 

[Into the Night]

The attack on January 6, dipshit!

The attack? You consider letting people into the Capitol building an attack?

All these twits did was take some selfies of themselves and vandalize some stuff.

 

[Into the Night]

Then you are a fool.

Calling people a fool is not a proof nor an argument. Insults are a fallacy. No argument presented.

 

[Matt Dillon]

If he did, do you think he should be prosecuted?

Do you think liberals would be breathing air long after they persecuted Trump?

Also: Is it OK if Trump takes hammers to everything Congress subpeonas?

 

[Blackcat13th]

Then you are a fool.

You voted for this guy

You're the fool.

 

[Jarod]

Do you think liberals would be breathing air long after they persecuted Trump?

Also: Is it OK if Trump takes hammers to everything Congress subpeonas?

Once something is subpoenaed it’s illegal to destroy it.

 

[Jarod]

You voted for this guy

You're the fool.

More coherent than the other choice, by a long shot.

 

[Jarod]

The attack? You consider letting people into the Capitol building an attack?

All these twits did was take some selfies of themselves and vandalize some stuff.

Breaking in while chanting “hang Mike Pence” and disrupting an constitutionally required session of Congress that the VP is presiding over.. is an attack.

If I busted into a restricted chamber of a Courtroom chanting about killing the Judge, you don’t think the Deputy would consider it an attack? If I shit or pissed on the floor, you don’t think I’d be arrested? If I stole the judges laptop, what would you think?

Wake up dude!

 

[Into the Night]

Once something is subpoenaed it’s illegal to destroy it.

Congress doesn't have authority to subpoena. NOTHING in the Constitution gives Congress the power to subpoena.

 

[Into the Night]

More coherent than the other choice, by a long shot.

The guy isn't even coherent.

 

[Into the Night]

Breaking in

They were let in.

while chanting “hang Mike Pence”

A few were, outside.

and disrupting an constitutionally required session of Congress that the VP is presiding over.. is an attack.

Congress has been disrupted before, even by members of Congress! No, that's not an attack.

If I busted into a restricted chamber of a Courtroom chanting about killing the Judge, you don’t think the Deputy would consider it an attack?

No Congress present.

If I shit or pissed on the floor, you don’t think I’d be arrested?

Not if you're in San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York City, or several other cities where the homeless do this all the time.

If I stole the judges laptop, what would you think?

Not if you're in San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York City,......

Wake up dude!

Wake up dude.

Stealing a laptop is not an attack.
Being let in to the Capitol building is not an attack.
Chanting is not an attack.

There was no insurrection.
Congress is not the government. The Constitution is.

Further, Trump did not vandalize anything in the Capitol building, never chanted "hang Mike Pence", never broke any windows, never broke any doors, never stole any laptop. He never did condone the rioters.

 

[Matt Dillon]

Once something is subpoenaed it’s illegal to destroy it.

I don't see Hillary having any problems for doing it.

 

[Jarod]

Congress doesn't have authority to subpoena. NOTHING in the Constitution gives Congress the power to subpoena.

Nothing in the Constitution gives anyone that right!

 

[Jarod]

The guy isn't even coherent.

I understood him.

 

[Jarod]

I don't see Hillary having any problems for doing it.

No evidence that she did, the subpoena was way to vague and stupidly written with loopholes the Titanic could have sailed through.

 

[Jarod]

They were let in.

A few were, outside.

Congress has been disrupted before, even by members of Congress! No, that's not an attack.

No Congress present.

Not if you're in San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York City, or several other cities where the homeless do this all the time.

Not if you're in San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York City,......

Wake up dude.

Stealing a laptop is not an attack.
Being let in to the Capitol building is not an attack.
Chanting is not an attack.

There was no insurrection.
Congress is not the government. The Constitution is.

Further, Trump did not vandalize anything in the Capitol building, never chanted "hang Mike Pence", never broke any windows, never broke any doors, never stole any laptop. He never did condone the rioters.

All distinctions without differences.

 

[Into the Night]

I don't see Hillary having any problems for doing it.

That's because Hillary doesn't recognize the Constitution of the United States.

 

[Into the Night]

Nothing in the Constitution gives anyone that right!

See Article III.