Saw that coming, Trumpers destroy constitution.

[Nomad]

Your subjective identity is meaningless

Your attempts at intelligent responses are meaningless.

 

[]2epo]v[an]

Your attempts at intelligent responses are meaningless.

Your bias appeasement based recognition skills are positively lower life form.

 

[Jarod]

Not when the constitution was written, no.
They're only recognized as having rights from the broader definition of "mankind" which honestly is a pretty big stretch.

The constitution was written to reflect natural law.

So, should todays constitution be interpreted to give women any rights?

 

[Nomad]

Your bias appeasement based recognition skills are positively lower life form.

This ^^^ coming from a Trump apologist/appeaser.

Who or what have I been attempting to appease?

Show me some examples.

 

[Airstrip One]

So, should todays constitution be interpreted to give women any rights?

Should it be interpreted to give babies the right to life?

 

[evince]

The challenge to abortion does not involve a Constitutional right to kill the unborn.

The Second Amendment does involve a specific right...gun ownership.

The Communist governor of California has no case. The Supremacy clause...

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Hahahhahahahaahahahahahahahaha



They just don’t get how stupid they look huh

 

[evince]

moreover, all the texas law does is regulate, in this case shorten the window.

Why not make it the first 24 hours you are pregnant


Science matters

 

[Truth Detector]

California governor says he will use legal tactics of Texas abortion ban to implement gun control.

Is this Supreme Court about to approve a way around constitutional rights?

Gavin Newsom is a moron. The Texas law does nothing to the Constitution. Abortion is not part of the Constitution. Gun rights are in the Constitution. Uneducated, low IQ leftist liars can't distinguish those simple facts. Therefore, they are prone to do stupid, unconstitutional things like this.

Another of your painfully dull, stupid arguments. I find it hard to believe you passed the bar.

 

[Truth Detector]

So you are on with States violating your constitutional rights?

Texas hasn't violated anyone's constitutional rights.

 

[Truth Detector]

The challenge to abortion does not involve a Constitutional right to kill the unborn.

The Second Amendment does involve a specific right...gun ownership.

The Communist governor of California has no case. The Supremacy clause...

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

 

[Truth Detector]

Jan 6 Trump committed treason

How so dimwitted wonder tard?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Hahahhahahahaahahahahahahahaha

They just don’t get how stupid they look huh

Because they are stupid? LOL

All they are doing is reinforcing the LW ideology that the Constitution gives us our rights instead of protects our unalienable rights. The GOP is dead. There are very few conservatives in Congress. Only the Party of Trump remains....and they are undeniably antiConstitutional as evidence is proving.

 

[Truth Detector]

So you do not believe we have a constitutional right to make personal medical decisions?

Of course you do. You just don't have the right to murder a human being after the 15th or 23rd month dimwit.

Does the Government have the right to force you to take a vaccine by destroying your livelihood?

 

[Truth Detector]

1. doesn't matter what I believe -what matters is SCOTUS interpretation.

2. you are MISSING THE FACT vaxxing mandates are "personal medical decisions" -
..(why are you in favor of a vaxx mandates that violate "personal medical decisions
but abortion personal medical decisions are different?)

3. even turning back regulatory power to states doesn't mean one doesn't get to decide
there are simply regs to that personal autonomy

 

[Truth Detector]

Wrong. Abortion is in the privacy clause of the constitution. You rightys want the government way into girls' lives. You want to monitor a girl who get pregnant. If she miscarriages and cannot prove it, it is jail for her. And a bounty on anyone who assists her or appears to. Playing the people against each other for fun and profit. What a great idea. A police state , just for girls, and with police deep into a girls life.

 

[Truth Detector]

What makes you think I support vaccine mandates.?

obtuse
ob·tuse | \ äb-ˈtüs , əb-, -ˈtyüs \
obtuser; obtusest
1 formal : stupid or unintelligent : not able to think clearly or to understand what is obvious or simple
He is too obtuse to take a hint.

 

[Truth Detector]

So you don’t agree that we have a right to privacy from the government about our personal medical decisions?

 

[Jarod]

Should it be interpreted to give babies the right to life?

It is/does.... But you have not answered my question.

 

[Truth Detector]

I personally support Roe v Wade. I dont think it's very good law,
but stare decisis carries a lot of weight especially when restricting rights ( enumerated or implied)

I also think it's stoopid politics for the RW to get into -we have momentous issues to stop the Progressives-
i see no upside in making this a campaign issue

Republicans aren't the one's bringing this to the Supreme Court.

 

[Truth Detector]

Genius move by Newsom. Shove it right in their faces.
Not unlike us challenging trumpkins on their defense of Shittenhouse, while denouncing the hero who put Babbitt down like a dog.