Rittenhouse NOT GUILTY!

[Legion]

Here's the problem with the left: A young man, with a legal rifle, went into a city to help protect a relative's property and killed a child molester and an abuser of a female. Righteous kills.

I'm not aware of any "relative's property" being defended, and the criminal history of the deceased attackers isn't legally relevant. The law does not permit the unprovoked killing of child molester or abusers of females by armed citizens.

The individuals who were shot were attacking a man with a rifle, and he had a reasonable expectation of imminent bodily harm from their actions - hence; self defense.

 

[Legion]

El sapo (frog), Nadler, has requested a federal review by the Justice Dept.

That's another matter.

 

[Legion]

I believe Rittenhouse should have been killed before he was able to kill two other people. Hopefully next time.

I doubt you'll try it yourself, should there ever be a "next time".

 

[Eagle_Eye]

Its what I thought was the correct decision based on the law.

The law needs changing.

There is nothing wrong with the law, the problem was the prosecutor was a bumbling Bozo who made the defenses case for them. The weapon was illegally purchased, therefore he should not have been in possession of it in the first place. Sane people do not physically attack a clearly armed person, (unless the have a death wish). At a minimum Rittenhouse was guilty of involuntary manslaughter.

 

[Diesel]

not at all. the kid still has no record. is young. in shape. primed and ready to either go to a law enforcement academy, college, or the military........he's going to be just fine

The kid's a fat fuck with a blemish that will never be erased from his personal record.

 

[Jarod]

I thought he said he was a practicing criminal......I may have misunderstood.....

I have two criminal cases going right now, one in felony court

 

[BartenderElite]

There is nothing wrong with the law, the problem was the prosecutor was a bumbling Bozo who made the defenses case for them. The weapon was illegally purchased, therefore he should not have been in possession of it in the first place. Sane people do not physically attack a clearly armed person, (unless the have a death wish). At a minimum Rittenhouse was guilty of involuntary manslaughter.

Sane people?

Let's just go hypothetical for a moment. What if Rittenhouse did go to that protest w/ a gun to just start shooting people? What if he was an active shooter and there to terrorize, instead of to protect?

If someone was just in the crowd and looked around to see him shooting...how would they know?

I would hope most citizens would try to intervene if they saw someone just shooting at a crowd. That's why the situation shouldn't have existed in the 1st place. Going into a situation armed, without any crowd control or crisis training - just a recipe for disaster.

 

[Ichabod Stain]

Woooo hoooo hell. In this Rattenhouse case when it comes to premediated murder of two innocent individuals who were exercising their 1st Amendment rights and the attempted murder of another individual for exercising his 1st Amendments rights, this atrocity amounted to a corrupt and un American court engaging in obstruction of justice to kiss that rat ass murderer and to go forth and celebrate in the sewer over this barbaric miscarriage of justice, and to which apparently so-called white lives don't matter either.

you have all the facts wrong and are a giant anus.

 

[Eagle_Eye]

Sane people?

Let's just go hypothetical for a moment. What if Rittenhouse did go to that protest w/ a gun to just start shooting people? What if he was an active shooter and there to terrorize, instead of to protect?

If someone was just in the crowd and looked around to see him shooting...how would they know?

I would hope most citizens would try to intervene if they saw someone just shooting at a crowd. That's why the situation shouldn't have existed in the 1st place. Going into a situation armed, without any crowd control or crisis training - just a recipe for disaster.

No argument there. But there are many who push their 2nd amendment rights. But as to your active shooter you would hear more than one or two shots over several minutes, telling you there was an active shooter.

As a GI I went through active shooter exercises and I can tell you they fire as fast and as many times as they can. Most active shooters expect to die so they go for the max bloodshed.

 

[BartenderElite]

No argument there. But there are many who push their 2nd amendment rights. But as to your active shooter you would hear more than one or two shots over several minutes, telling you there was an active shooter.

As a GI I went through active shooter exercises and I can tell you they fire as fast and as many times as they can. Most active shooters expect to die so they go for the max bloodshed.

That's true, though for most who aren't trained, it's probably not something that crosses their mind in that kind of situation. I've tried to put myself in that position since the trial started: what if I turned around, and just saw someone w/ an AK shooting? I think my 1st thought would be that they were a danger to others and should be stopped.

We're much more conditioned for that kind of shooter at this point, which in itself is sad.

Tough case, all the way around. I think the jury was correct, given the laws. I don't think KR intended to kill anyone. I think he went there with good intent, the volume got turned up fast & he was in over his head before he had a chance to catch his breath. Just a tragic situation for everyone involved.

Many thanks for your service, btw! I know that has become sort of a token thing to say, but it is truly appreciated.

 

[Into the Night]

Its what I thought was the correct decision based on the law.

The law needs changing.

So you want to outlaw self defense. Gotit.

 

[Into the Night]

Now you fascists have a license to kill.

Telling your fellow Democrats they have a license to kill is war mongering, dumbass.

 

[Into the Night]

He got away with murder.

Self defense isn't murder.

 

[Into the Night]

now the left will riot, loot, burn, and murder. get ready

Didn't take long. Such riots have already broken out in Portland and Seattle.

 

[Moosakofsky]

The law needs changing.

In what way?

 

[Into the Night]

go learn the law, idiot

You forget he discards the Constitution and the law.

 

[Into the Night]

Our justice system is working. The despicable PHONY media who lied and promoted FALSE narratives, the lying weasel of a prosecutor all should apologize for lying to the public.

Blame the prosecutor all you want, but remember the prosecutor presented the strongest case for the defense in the trial.

THAT's incompetence!

 

[Into the Night]

There is nothing wrong with the law, the problem was the prosecutor was a bumbling Bozo who made the defenses case for them. The weapon was illegally purchased, therefore he should not have been in possession of it in the first place. Sane people do not physically attack a clearly armed person, (unless the have a death wish). At a minimum Rittenhouse was guilty of involuntary manslaughter.

The weapon was not illegally purchased. It is legal for Kyle to carry that weapon in Kenosha. Since these idiots attacked Kyle despite the fact Kyle was armed, they were insane, by your own definition.

 

[Ichabod Stain]

There is nothing wrong with the law, the problem was the prosecutor was a bumbling Bozo who made the defenses case for them. The weapon was illegally purchased, therefore he should not have been in possession of it in the first place. Sane people do not physically attack a clearly armed person, (unless the have a death wish). At a minimum Rittenhouse was guilty of involuntary manslaughter.

you're a fucking idiot.

 

[Moosakofsky]

The weapon was illegally purchased, .

It was legally purchased.