It looks like the jury is giving it thought.

So you believe what they are protesting is what makes the difference? It’s OK to protest, loot, burn, and destroy corporate property if you’re protesting one thing but not OK if you’re protesting another? Is that your position?

no, the difference is violence and damage. nothing but tea was damaged in boston way back then, not a valid comparison
 
I forget when they split up, but Rittenhouse eventually ended up at his killing spot because there was absolutely nothing going on where he and his Nazi friend were 'stationed'.

Cops had already cleared the streets and there was a curfew in place.

The jury has all that evidence at their fingertips.
 
hung or not guilty is the obvious outcome

you can't find 12 people anywhere that would convict based on the evidence provided

they are likely discussing how this ever went to trial as they review the lack of evidence.

This post aged well. :laugh:
 
wow - shit stain thinks the verdict is in

subtitle - how to tell everyone you are retarded without saying you are retarded

Aww. Are you embarrassed about being wrong? That doesn't make sense. That would require a certain self awareness that you lack.
 
1637265557236-png.861630
 
you became a joke the minute you were born

And I'm still laughing 65 years later. Why aren't you laughing, Sock?

Why are you such an ugly, bitter anti-American asshole who wants to overthrow our government and shred the Constitution?

Worse, as much as you bitch about how our nation is dying, you'll never get off your ass to do anything about it. You just sit in your room with your thumb up your ass and spin lies.

Personally, I forgive you because you're just a crazy old man who wants to commit murder/suicide and can't.

56jtsq.jpg
 
Back
Top