anonymoose
Classical Liberal
Have they?
Kyle Rittenhouse
- Thread starter anonymoose
- Start date
Have they?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Ahh, so now you're playing a hero for the Left anti-gun movement. That's really funny.I dont carry at all. No need to. Ive got my feet, elbo's, and fists. Before you get your pop gun un holstered I would most likely already have you down in a rear naked gasping for mommy.
Is that because the Feds are running you through a credit check?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Are we both agreed Kyle is getting a fair trial?
christiefan915
Catalyst
I've never seen it.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
No competent leader believes violence is the first or even fifth answer.
When attacked, as the terrorists did on 1/6, then self-defense is an option.
Notice the "government" you hate so much was only forced to kill one terrorist that day whereas I, had I been in charge, would have taken out the first row of people coming through the the doors. If that didn't stop them, I'd wait until they advance a body length and taken out the second row then so forth until time to fire the FPF.
A QRF would also have been on call and immediately activated upon terrorists breaching the police line.
Lucky for your terrorist friends, men of peace were in charge that day. LOL
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Good thing. It's like watching a Tucker show or hearing a scratching on a chalkboard. Your choice.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
SmarterthanYou
rebel
so you want me to look at you as someone who would have killed immediately, while deigning to accuse me of being bloodthirsty..........and hoping for collateral damage.........ROFL.........yeah, I can't help but see how much of a leftie you really are. you and evince are peas in a pod
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Not yet. I'm saying they claimed they would. Do you think they'll back out now? Backing out is risky too.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/te...risky-decision-self-defense-trial-2021-11-08/
Kyle Rittenhouse, the teenager on trial for killing two protesters and wounding a third in Wisconsin last year, appears set to try a different tack. His lawyer, Mark Richards, said in court last week that he would take the stand in his own defense.
christiefan915
Catalyst
If I had cable I'd probably take a look at shows like that at least once. But from the way people talk about them, I'm not missing much.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
right. like you don't watch leftie shows with steadfast devotion
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Annoying people are annoying, no matter what their politics are.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
No.
It's like watching a bomb falling. Anyone can see the path fucking morons our putting our country upon. How much further down the road of lies, rampant hate, rampant advocations of violence and actual violence before something really big happens? It's not rocket science to look down the path a bit to see what's coming.
History is full of such stories. The fucking paintball morons have a Turner Diary-based fantasy of the American Revolution. The reality for them is more like what happened to the black liberation movement, MOVE, May 13, 1985. More people should learn the difference simply wishing for things and learning how to predict things.
https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/8/8/20747198/philadelphia-bombing-1985-move
On the evening of May 13, 1985, longstanding tensions between MOVE, a black liberation group, and the Philadelphia Police Department erupted horrifically.
That night, the city of Philadelphia dropped a satchel bomb, a demolition device typically used in combat, laced with Tovex and C-4 explosives on the MOVE organization, who were living in a West Philadelphia rowhome known to be occupied by men, women, and children. It went up in unextinguished flames.
Eleven people were killed, including five children and the founder of the organization. Sixty-one homes were destroyed, and more than 250 citizens were left homeless.
Ahh, so now you're playing a hero for the Left anti-gun movement. That's really funny.
Is that because the Feds are running you through a credit check?
Not at all. Right now at this point in my life I dont think I have a need to carry a gun. When I do,...then I will. I am a strong supporter of the 2nd amendment.
Yep.
Ahh, so now you're playing a hero for the Left anti-gun movement. That's really funny.
Is that because the Feds are running you through a credit check?
If you only knew what I just went through only a month ago. REALLY glad I didnt have a gun on me then.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
right...........I bet you didn't have a problem with the feds assault on ruby ridge, did you? or waco? or basically anyone you saw as challenging the authority of the federal government that you feel is absolute
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Good thing I'm not the chief of police, amirite?
You're an oath-breaker so I no longer expect you to understand the difference between duty and desire.
I believe killing is wrong, but had it been my responsibility to protect the lives of our elected officials against an angry, violent, armed* mob then it would have been my duty to carry out that duty including use of deadly force. I would have done my duty.
*you defined armed as swinging a skateboard or others things. They had similar items.