ExpressLane
Verified User
At a minimum he was inciting to riot. Undercover agents are not supposed to break the law.
At a minimum he was inciting to riot. Undercover agents are not supposed to break the law.
Dont ask logical questions they can’t answer without lying. It makes them look badIf it was debunked then why is garland still “investigating” it?
Only the fedsBut a cop can lie to you ... you can't lie to a cop
Has Ray Epps been arrested for his part in the so-called "riot"? Why not?
Only the feds
At a minimum he was inciting to riot. Undercover agents are not supposed to break the law.
And will remain that way since the dims refuse to let the R's investigate.
If it was debunked then why is garland still “investigating” it?
At a minimum he was inciting to riot. Undercover agents are not supposed to break the law.
It is not "instigation" when it is the night before the event and the crowd is arguing against his urging to go into the Capitol.
Are the Trump supporters such lemmings that they followed him and cannot think for themselves?
What is the evidence he was ever in the FBI data bank or that he was removed from it?
Who makes up the Revolver investigation team?
That was far from the legal definition of inciting a riot. The riot has to be a direct result of his comments and must be immediately after that speech. He is not an undercover agent or breaking the law.
They have screen captures of the FBI's that show Epps then screen captures with his picture removed he was removed the day after Revolver news released an article on Epps.It is not "instigation" when it is the night before the event and the crowd is arguing against his urging to go into the Capitol.
Are the Trump supporters such lemmings that they followed him and cannot think for themselves?
What is the evidence he was ever in the FBI data bank or that he was removed from it?
Who makes up the Revolver investigation team?
They have screen captures of the FBI's that show Epps then screen captures with his picture removed he was removed the day after Revolver news released an article on Epps.
Stop being a dishonest jackass. He was there that day as well if you had bothered to watch the videos. HE didn't remove anything you moron. The FBI removed his information.
^Dumbass didn't read the story or watch the videos of him doing just that.![]()
They have screen captures of the FBI's that show Epps then screen captures with his picture removed he was removed the day after Revolver news released an article on Epps.
Truth^Dumbass didn't read the story or watch the videos of him doing just that.
![]()
You can go to the FBI page yourself and verify he is no longer on the page. He was photograph #16 note how it now jumps from #15 to #17 and there is no #16 anymore.Who is "they"? How do you know who removed the image? The FBI knows there are many videos of him and would never believe they could doctor a film to accomplish anything.
The conspiracies just get wilder and wilder.
How reliable a source is Revolver and who makes up their investigative team?