judge may allow the men Kyle Rittenhouse shot to be called 'rioters' or 'looters'

LV426 said:
NOPE.

WRONGO.

You must be at least 18 to open carry a weapon in Wisconsin:

What Is The Age Requirement To Open Carry In Wisconsin?
You must be at least eighteen years old to open carry in Wisconsin.
https://gunlawsuits.org/gun-laws/wisconsin/open-carry/
Click to expand...

again with the faulty law knowledge

Statute 29.304(3)(b) states: "No person 14 years of age or older but under 16 years of age may have in his or her possession or control any firearm"

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/29/iv/304/3/b
 
LV426 said:
I think you're the biased one here, because your entire argument hinges on Kyle's feelings, whereas my argument hinges on the facts.
Click to expand...

your argument hinges on your political ideology and emotions, not facts. my opinion is based on the law. plain and simple, as i've proven here many times
 
LV426 said:
Why would it be cruel? Because his parents did a shit job raising him? Maybe all three should be thrown in the hole?
Click to expand...

You have no clue what it's like to be in a hole.

As they said in "The Shawshank Redemption", one day in the hole is like a week in prison.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
An Illinois man who shot three people during a protest over police brutality in Wisconsin last year was justified because the men confronted him and two of them tried to wrestle his gun away
Click to expand...

It's gonna be really hard to convince a jury that wrestling a gun away from an active shooter makes the active shooter feel threatened for his life.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
the simple fact that you believe only cops can fear for their lives if their weapon is taken, but a civilian must believe they won't be harmed makes you dumber than domer
Click to expand...

Ummmm...I don't believe cops ever legitimately fear for their lives...so not sure what impact you think this is going to have on me.
 
LV426 said:
It's gonna be really hard to convince a jury that wrestling a gun away from an active shooter makes the active shooter feel threatened for his life.
Click to expand...

it's going to be impossible to convince a jury that he was an active shooter when there's video that clearly shows he was being attacked when he shot the first person
 
SmarterthanYou said:
like I said. you're all over the map and making zero sense because you're angry about being wrong
Click to expand...

This Marine did exactly what the guys in Kenosha tried to do to Rittenhouse:


So according to you, the robbers here would have been justified in shooting the Marine because he attempted to disarm them.
 
LV426 said:
This Marine did exactly what the guys in Kenosha tried to do to Rittenhouse:


So according to you, the robbers here would have been justified in shooting the Marine because he attempted to disarm them.
Click to expand...

you're delusional............we're done here. your version of 'reality' belongs in fairy tale land.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
if grosskreutz was armed, why didn't he shoot the active shooter? he had a gun in his hand
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter whether he was armed or not, Kyle shot first, then others attempted to disarm him, so he shot them, and then when someone came to help, he shot that person too!

Kyle Rittenhouse is a mass shooter, and had those guys died trying to disarm a mass shooter in any other place, you'd consider them heroes.
 
AProudLefty said:
Thank you. And FYI I am deaf.

I paused at 2:55. It is not clear what those two guys held. Quality is poor.
Click to expand...

It's reported, and confirmed IMO, that a handgun eventually came up (after Kyle had already fired a few shots or more IIRC) along with the skateboard.

Despite the similarities, a major difference here is that Zimmerman defended himself against someone beating his head into the ground. He fired one shot. Personally,I'd have emptied the magazine, but that's another story. Zimmerman was overcharged for the shooting and got off scott free.

Kyle isn't overcharged, there's video proving a ruckus, but when does a person have a right to kill another person? After a punch? Taking a swing? Approaching in an aggressive manner?

A few fucking morons on this forum have made death threats. If the moron suddenly announced him/herself would the person who was given the death threat have a right to pull a pistol and shoot the aggressor in the face?
 
LV426 said:
Doesn't matter whether he was armed or not, Kyle shot first, then others attempted to disarm him, so he shot them, and then when someone came to help, he shot that person too!

Kyle Rittenhouse is a mass shooter, and had those guys died trying to disarm a mass shooter in any other place, you'd consider them heroes.
Click to expand...

good luck with that when the entire video events show the opposite.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top