Yes...but most intelligent individuals do not attempt to defend the indefensible. They got away with doing it with Mike Brown, and Trayvon Martin because there was no video.
In this instance, there is nothing to defend. You know you've lost when you claim that a knee on the neck is not a knee on the neck.
There's other evidence besides video, which may not have benefit either of those cases. OTOH, video certainly made the case for the prosecution in Chauvin's trial.
Who knows? Maybe he'll find Jesus...or Muhammad.

