Suddenly Fauci wants an investigation into Covid origin

If they are like me they are ‘meh, whatever’ about it. The only reason we’d care is that it’s yet another political operation by democrats.

I can’t get over the ‘meh, whatever’ attitude about the origin of a virus that’s killed 600,000 [assuming that’s actually accurate] Americans, added trillions to the national debt, closed schools, shut down businesses and etc.

It’s like wtf.

What were we supposed to do? :dunno:
 
I've always supported investigating all such things. It's the political extremists who pick and choose investigations based upon political bias.

But like Fauci, you’ve suddenly become vocal about supporting an investigation into the origin of the virus lol?

The virus is actually a much bigger deal—if it turns out to have been weaponized.
 
And Fauci did not "suddenly change" anything. Strawman

Agreed. The problem of lying by omission is that it hides the larger truth. In this case, the revelation of Wuhan workers becoming sick warranted a closer look.

New evidence can, and should, give cause to reinvestigate. Weiner's laptop warranted reopening Hillary's investigation because it was proof she lied about only deleting personal emails. She buried evidence. Obstructed justice. All of which no one would have known about if Comey hadn't done his job.

Same goes for Fauci and all other government departments and personnel. It's their job.
 
ROFL
so last year when he called it a "conspiracy" theory the virus was man made was what?? consistency? LMAO

No. Accurate. Fauci has not said what you claim, as usual, traitor. We'll add liar to your list of despicable qualities as well. Let me see the quote where he said 'entirely possible'. I'll wait.
 
But like Fauci, you’ve suddenly become vocal about supporting an investigation into the origin of the virus lol?

The virus is actually a much bigger deal—if it turns out to have been weaponized.

AND THE CORON-A-CRATS ARE DEPSERATE TO PREVENT KNOWLEDGE OF THAT ORDER BEING PURSUED....I WONDER WHY?
 
I am sure you have a unbiased source for that.

Or an actual quote. ;)

Something like:

"A question that probably some of you are thinking of if you’re totally into that world, which I find to be very interesting. So, supposedly we hit the body with a tremendous, whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light, and I think you said that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way. (To Bryan) And I think you said you’re going to test that, too. Sounds interesting, right?"

Or

"And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning, because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it’d be interesting to check that, so that you’re going to have to use medical doctors with, but it sounds interesting to me. So, we’ll see, but the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute. That’s pretty powerful."
 
He didn't change. We all know that it's possible that it came from the lab. Nothing changed.

Agreed. Where, before, there wasn't any evidence of the "lab" theory and, now, there is evidence. Follow the science and the law.

Following the science and the law is an easy concept to understand for those who follow science and the law. The ignorant and the criminal, not so much.
 
But like Fauci, you’ve suddenly become vocal about supporting an investigation into the origin of the virus lol?

The virus is actually a much bigger deal—if it turns out to have been weaponized.

Why are you so desperate to put words in my mouth? It's not like this is the first time the Wuhan subject has come up. My position remains the same: Investigate all malfeasance against We, the People.

Smart people think ahead and consider the "What ifs". What should the US reaction be IF:
1) it's human-engineered accident, a biological Chernobyl.
2) a) A bioweapon that got loose b) a bioweapon intentionally released
3) Unknown, but suspect they're guilty
4) Unknown, but believe it's a natural event.
 
Agreed. Where, before, there wasn't any evidence of the "lab" theory and, now, there is evidence. Follow the science and the law.

Following the science and the law is an easy concept to understand for those who follow science and the law. The ignorant and the criminal, not so much.

The only possible ‘science’ Fauci, and his defenders, can be following is ‘lack of evidence’ for the natural origin theory.

That’s the dirty little secret: a year ago the two theories were both equally legitimate. A female virologist from China, a doctor Yan was an actual fact witness that claimed it originated in a lab. She was forced to leave China and when she gets here she’s smeared as a pants on fire conspiracy theorist by one of the ‘fact checkers’.

This sudden ‘revelation’ by Fauci is just more evidence of what many have suspected for months—he’s just another weasel.
 
Why are you so desperate to put words in my mouth? It's not like this is the first time the Wuhan subject has come up. My position remains the same: Investigate all malfeasance against We, the People.

Smart people think ahead and consider the "What ifs". What should the US reaction be IF:
1) it's human-engineered accident, a biological Chernobyl.
2) a) A bioweapon that got loose b) a bioweapon intentionally released
3) Unknown, but suspect they're guilty
4) Unknown, but believe it's a natural event.

Well, I just never heard the words ‘investigate the lab origin’ come out of your mouth until recently lol.
 
The only possible ‘science’ Fauci, and his defenders, can be following is ‘lack of evidence’ for the natural origin theory.

That’s the dirty little secret: a year ago the two theories were both equally legitimate. A female virologist from China, a doctor Yan was an actual fact witness that claimed it originated in a lab. She was forced to leave China and when she gets here she’s smeared as a pants on fire conspiracy theorist by one of the ‘fact checkers’.

This sudden ‘revelation’ by Fauci is just more evidence of what many have suspected for months—he’s just another weasel.

Why are you so desperate to put words in Fauci's mouth?

As JPP Uncle has pointed out, there are at least four possibilities. Nobody has ever denied those possibilities.
 
The only possible ‘science’ Fauci, and his defenders, can be following is ‘lack of evidence’ for the natural origin theory.

That’s the dirty little secret: a year ago the two theories were both equally legitimate. A female virologist from China, a doctor Yan was an actual fact witness that claimed it originated in a lab. She was forced to leave China and when she gets here she’s smeared as a pants on fire conspiracy theorist by one of the ‘fact checkers’.

This sudden ‘revelation’ by Fauci is just more evidence of what many have suspected for months—he’s just another weasel.

Conspiracy theorists are never wrong. ;)
 

How about a non redundant commission to investigate the origin of the virus? This wouldn’t be ‘yet another’ investigation into the origin it.

Think about that: it’s over a year into a global pandemic that claimed millions of lives and they are *just now* getting serious about investigating how it started. And NOT an investigation led by virologists who may have a stake in the outcome of the investigation.

So yes, we take Fauci’s advice and investigate how the virus originated, finally. But Fauci sits on the side lines.

Pretty obvious it was collusion between the DNC/ FBI and the Chicoms. They all hated Trump that much.
 
I never realized that gaslighting people with the truth is a bad thing. :D

So Trump was never an idiot for suggesting the lab theory and the ‘expert consensus’ was never that the natural origin theory was highly likely true and Uncle spent months bitching about a lack of interest in the lab theory?

I’m glad you’re here to keep me straight.
 
Agreed. The problem of lying by omission is that it hides the larger truth. In this case, the revelation of Wuhan workers becoming sick warranted a closer look.

New evidence can, and should, give cause to reinvestigate. Weiner's laptop warranted reopening Hillary's investigation because it was proof she lied about only deleting personal emails. She buried evidence. Obstructed justice. All of which no one would have known about if Comey hadn't done his job.

Same goes for Fauci and all other government departments and personnel. It's their job.
They have known for months now that several Lab workers got sick and were hospitalized with COVID like symptoms in like October.
 
So Trump was never an idiot for suggesting the lab theory and the ‘expert consensus’ was never that the natural origin theory was highly likely true and Uncle spent months bitching about a lack of interest in the lab theory?

I’m glad you’re here to keep me straight.

When did Trump say that?
 
Back
Top