Twitter cancels Project Veritas founder

So do you deny CNN's technical director said CNN engages in propaganda???

I do not deny anything.

Using the Covington kid example, do you deny or accept the story about the kid based on that brief video?

Let's analyze this, shall we?

“[Trump’s] hand was shaking or whatever, I think. We brought in so many medical people to tell a story that was all speculation -- that he was neurologically damaged, and he was losing it. He's unfit to -- you know, whatever. We were creating a story there that we didn't know anything about. That's what -- I think that’s propaganda,” Chester said.

What does "--" signify?
 
Not what i saw. He spoke a complete thought and the wrote the text and highlighted with most important parts. They did just product incomplete phrases. The context was there.

https://www.projectveritas.com/news...etwork-engaged-in-propaganda-to-remove-trump/

That’s both spliced and edited but the dude said what he said. In fact, he was quite emphatic about CNN being instrumental in removing Trump from office.

I don’t see how further context would salvage it.
 
This is a part of the propaganda. I'll let you figure it out.

project-veritas-okeefe.jpg
 
OF COURSE; O'KEEFE KEEPS TELLING THE TRUTH TO THE WORLD....THE LEFT CAN'T HAVE THAT, CAN THEY?

MEANWHILE THEY BLOCKED THE HUNTER BIDEN STORY...

Oh, your one of those. This is one dispicable human being. Okeefe should be sued repeatedly and live in court.
 
The question is, and probably one of very important questions, why are they so focused on CNN for so many years? They haven't found anything wrongdoings except for a rare occurrences.

Notice that nobody is trying to "discredit" Fox News as hard as they do with CNN and others?

Think about that.
 
The question is, and probably one of very important questions, why are they so focused on CNN for so many years? They haven't found anything wrongdoings except for a rare occurrences.

Notice that nobody is trying to "discredit" Fox News as hard as they do with CNN and others?

Think about that.
Surely you jest. They have people listening to every word Fox News says. They have made multiple runs at Carlson and Hannity to try to remove them from the air waves. They have threatened to boycott Fox's advertisers. They have had Congressmen and women try to remove Fox from the air. They successfully go after CNN because they are a dirty illegit propaganda agency.
 
Surely you jest. They have people listening to every word Fox News says. They have made multiple runs at Carlson and Hannity to try to remove them from the air waves. They have threatened to boycott Fox's advertisers. They have had Congressmen and women try to remove Fox from the air. They successfully go after CNN because they are a dirty illegit propaganda agency.

Tucker and Hannity are commenters.
 
Yes they are. Fox plays it by the book in their news department. So no one can get dirty on them. CNN on the other hand is way out of control and not a true news agency.

See that's what I am talking about.

As I have stated, Maddow is the equivalent of Hannity.

But what reports are false or biased on CNN? What reports are a part of propaganda as claimed? How did they help Biden win and Trump lose? Many questions.

Nobody can answer.
 
Back
Top