The Bill of Rights is NOT negotiable.

[Rune]

Sorry Joe you demented sod.
The 2nd Ammendment is part of the Bill of Rights.

What is it you don't understand about "Shall not be infringed"?

 

[Flash]

Sorry Joe you demented sod.
The 2nd Ammendment is part of the Bill of Rights.

What is it you don't understand about "Shall not be infringed"?

Does that mean they are absolute? Speech, press, religion....

 

[Billy the Great Khan]

Does that mean they are absolute? Speech, press, religion....

Yes.

 

[leaningright]

Sorry Joe you demented sod.
The 2nd Ammendment is part of the Bill of Rights.

What is it you don't understand about "Shall not be infringed"?

On so many issues Rune and I have disagreed but on this issue we are on the same page.

 

[Concart]

Sorry Joe you demented sod.
The 2nd Ammendment is part of the Bill of Rights.

What is it you don't understand about "Shall not be infringed"?

Try to make a nuclear weapon and see how that works out for you.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Try to make a nuclear weapon and see how that works out for you.

try to deny me any of my rights or property, see how that works out for you

 

[Flash]

Yes.

That makes laws against threats, libel, slander, pornography, child pornography all unconstitutional?

 

[Mr.Badguy]

Sorry Joe you demented sod.
The 2nd Ammendment is part of the Bill of Rights.

What is it you don't understand about "Shall not be infringed"?

You're already tolerating "infringement" thanks to the NFA, who's to say you won't tolerate a little more?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

That makes laws against threats, libel, slander, pornography, child pornography all unconstitutional?

hyperbolic bullshit. come back with facts and logic

 

[Concart]

The only thing that matters is how the court views the Bill of Rights, and it is indeed 'negotiable' in that it is not unlimited. Period. When a personal right is outweighed by a public good, that right takes a back seat. Sorry.

 

[Concart]

Yes.

SCOTUS disagrees with you. Fundamentally and totally.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

The only thing that matters is how the court views the Bill of Rights

the courts are not the final arbiter of the constitution, we the people are

and it is indeed 'negotiable' in that it is not unlimited.

then we have no rights, only permissions from government that can be denied at will.

When a personal right is outweighed by a public good, that right takes a back seat. Sorry.

the founders never said that it's a balance between rights and public safety, it's always been a biased towards liberty, so yes, you are sorry. a failed american.

 

[Grokmaster]

Try to make a nuclear weapon and see how that works out for you.

WHAT A STUPIDFUCK POST. TYPICAL OF YOUR IDIOT ASS....

KEEP AND "BEAR" GENERALLY MEANS WHAT YOU CAN PICK UP, MORONASAURUS.

 

[BidenPresident]

Sorry Joe you demented sod.
The 2nd Ammendment is part of the Bill of Rights.

What is it you don't understand about "Shall not be infringed"?

"well regulated militia"

 

[SmarterthanYou]

"well regulated militia"

it is the absolute height of stupidity to believe that the framers would guarantee the right of the government to control our arms after they had just won a war for independence from a government that tried to control their arms

 

[Grokmaster]

The only thing that matters is how the court views the Bill of Rights, and it is indeed 'negotiable' in that it is not unlimited. Period. When a personal right is outweighed by a public good, that right takes a back seat. Sorry.

WRONG. INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS OUTWEIGH GOVERNMENT POWER.

THAT IS THE ENTIRE POINT OF THE CONSTITUTION.

OUR RIGHTS ARE NOT "GIFTS" FROM THE GOVERNMENT. THE GOVERNMENT WORKS FOR US, NOT VICER VERSA...EXCEPT IN LEFTGOOFYWORLD.

 

[BidenPresident]

it is the absolute height of stupidity to believe that the framers would guarantee the right of the government to control our arms after they had just won a war for independence from a government that tried to control their arms

Wrong.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Wrong.

you can provide historical documentation to back that up, i'm sure...............we'll wait

 

[BidenPresident]

you can provide historical documentation to back that up, i'm sure...............we'll wait

"well organized militia". Why write meaningless words in an amendment?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

"well organized militia". Why write meaningless words in an amendment?

so you have no historical evidence to corroborate your bullshit. Shall I provide MY historical evidence that proves it's not about government?