Where is justice for Ashli?

At what point do threats against elected officials warrant deadly force? Do you need to individually be the threat or is being part of a group putting elected officials at risk warrant deadly force? Again, imagine Americans screaming praise Allah while doing this, does it change your perspective?

Moreover, if you are unarmed member of an armed group are you truly unarmed?

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

no elected officials were at risk......
 
Why was she the ONLY one who was shot if there was such a danger to those scared shitless (and that crybaby AOC who wasn't even in the capitol!) lawmakers? You'd think all the guards would have "opened up" on them, no?

I agree that Babbitt should NOT have been the only insurrectionist shot. Less damage would have occurred if many more of them were shot.

What Babbitt did indeed receive, however, was JUSTICE.
 
Ashli Babbitt was an insurrectionist who was shot and killed during a riot for attempting to interfere with the democratic process of the United States.

.
Babbit was put down just before she could complete her attempt to murder any of a number of our nation's leaders. They were mere feet away from the window she breached. You have to laugh at the mention of her 'peacefully protesting'.
 
The articles I read indicate she was attempting to climb through a window that was smashed open by rioters. The door with the broken window opened up the group of rioters, insurrectionists and traitors to the speakers chamber (?) and the House Chamber.

At what point does an "unarmed" member of a group of traitors and insurrectionists become enough of a threat that deadly forces is necessary.

Imagine that, instead of "stop the steal" they were saying "praise Allah"... would you question the shooting?

She was part of a threat that needed to be stopped... unfortunate that she died but I defend the officer and our House

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

When they start looting, and burning private and government property!
Stooped? You mean shot in cold blood while possessing no weapon?
 
Babbit was put down just before she could complete her attempt to murder any of a number of our nation's leaders. They were mere feet away from the window she breached. You have to laugh at the mention of her 'peacefully protesting'.

Stop typing it's embarrassing!
 
I agree that Babbitt should NOT have been the only insurrectionist shot. Less damage would have occurred if many more of them were shot.

What Babbitt did indeed receive, however, was JUSTICE.

Not once have I seen you denounce the riots in those cities. So can it until you do.
 
Not once have I seen you denounce the riots in those cities. So can it until you do.

BLM reasonably protested against the Derek Chauvin's of the world. I support their efforts.
MAGA revolted against democracy and the peaceful transfer of power. Every participant truly deserves to be in Guantanamo.

But Arby, if you can't see a HUGE difference, maybe your mom dropped you off the dressing table too often when changing your Pampers.
 
The articles I read indicate she was attempting to climb through a window that was smashed open by rioters. The door with the broken window opened up the group of rioters, insurrectionists and traitors to the speakers chamber (?) and the House Chamber.

At what point does an "unarmed" member of a group of traitors and insurrectionists become enough of a threat that deadly forces is necessary.

Imagine that, instead of "stop the steal" they were saying "praise Allah"... would you question the shooting?

She was part of a threat that needed to be stopped... unfortunate that she died but I defend the officer and our House

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Never
 
When they start looting, and burning private and government property!
Stooped? You mean shot in cold blood while possessing no weapon?
True or False

She was part of a larger crowd that killed 1 officer, electroshock another, screamed threats against the VP.

If during that, I hear that information on my radio that might constitute deadly force before they breach the doors.

She was unarmed, alone in her car while being confronted for speeding or expired plates. She was part of a violent insurrection at our Capitol.

It is sad that she was killed. However, to attmept to equate this to an unarmed person being shot is awful.

It isn't the same, not even close.



Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
 
At what point do threats against elected officials warrant deadly force? Do you need to individually be the threat or is being part of a group putting elected officials at risk warrant deadly force? Again, imagine Americans screaming praise Allah while doing this, does it change your perspective?

Moreover, if you are unarmed member of an armed group are you truly unarmed?

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
No one had guns EXCEPT the Capital police. Only ONE Capital policeman was stupid enough to discharge his weapon at an UNARMED woman. That policeman deserves to be exposed. He needs to be charged and a court needs to decide if his actions were warranted or not.
 
True or False

She was part of a larger crowd that killed 1 officer, electroshock another, screamed threats against the VP.

If during that, I hear that information on my radio that might constitute deadly force before they breach the doors.

She was unarmed, alone in her car while being confronted for speeding or expired plates. She was part of a violent insurrection at our Capitol.

It is sad that she was killed. However, to attmept to equate this to an unarmed person being shot is awful.

It isn't the same, not even close.



Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Insurrection is a buzz word for protest! People got into the capital to allow congress to know we the people are pissed, at least some of us, no burning, no looting some damage yes, the policeman was killed but not murdered according to his own family! Compared to what happened last Summer it was tame.
Who was the person in the car I would like to look it up.
 
No one had guns EXCEPT the Capital police. Only ONE Capital policeman was stupid enough to discharge his weapon at an UNARMED woman. That policeman deserves to be exposed. He needs to be charged and a court needs to decide if his actions were warranted or not.

Absolutely!
 
True or False

She was part of a larger crowd that killed 1 officer, electroshock another, screamed threats against the VP.

If during that, I hear that information on my radio that might constitute deadly force before they breach the doors.

She was unarmed, alone in her car while being confronted for speeding or expired plates. She was part of a violent insurrection at our Capitol.

It is sad that she was killed. However, to attmept to equate this to an unarmed person being shot is awful.

It isn't the same, not even close.



Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
How did they kill that officer?
 
True or False

She was part of a larger crowd that killed 1 officer, electroshock another, screamed threats against the VP.

If during that, I hear that information on my radio that might constitute deadly force before they breach the doors.

She was unarmed, alone in her car while being confronted for speeding or expired plates. She was part of a violent insurrection at our Capitol.

It is sad that she was killed. However, to attmept to equate this to an unarmed person being shot is awful.

It isn't the same, not even close.



Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Exactly

As has often been said, under the same circumstances, if the MAGA militia had been BLM protesters the same wingers here would have been labeling the women an American Guy Fawkes
 
No one had guns EXCEPT the Capital police. Only ONE Capital policeman was stupid enough to discharge his weapon at an UNARMED woman. That policeman deserves to be exposed. He needs to be charged and a court needs to decide if his actions were warranted or not.

Yup.

Either that, or we have yet another double standard.
 
Back
Top