the AR-15 follies: Here we go again!

Banning military type assault weapons that can hold an expanded round magazine, isn't chipping away at your rights, you can own a weapon, just not those.

Why do teabaggers (www.teaparty.org) have the need for a weapon like that? Can't SHOOT?

Define "military type assault weapons" since the only military weapons I have are bolt action rifles and one semi-automatic pistol. The rest are all civilian manufacture for the civilian market.

Thanks for confirming you want to ban guns.....just not all guns.....yet. :)

I don't know. Ask a fucking teabagger.
 
Democrats are REALLY foaming at the mouth to use one of these INCREDIBLY rare shooting events to FURTHER destroy the Constitution and country.

Democrats really are vastly more dangerous than a million so-called mass shooters, and they've been proving it for the last 5 years; they're 21st century Nazis.

Here are not-so-rare events. 40,000 gun deaths per year. New record in 2020.

Rare? Nope. Common? Yep
 
Your OP's a mess. Democrats: Deranged warmongering psychopaths responsible for the death of millions, the destruction of tens of millions of lives, and the greatest danger to the country & world since Nazi Germany.

:lolup:

See folks? This is the exact type of mentally fucked up individual that should be prevented from possessing weapons.
 
Here's muh security :)

img_0173.jpg_thumbnail0.jpg

Wow! Such a portable and concealable weapon for self-defense. Does Mother let you have just one bullet for your pea-shooter, Barney? :rofl2:
 
Oh - the 500k natural deaths from underlying conditions/co-morbidities falsely attributed to Covid due to the deranged Nazism of Democrat terrorists; yes - I'm aware of that.

:lolup:

Folks, give up on this kind of ignorance. This kind of stupid is unfixable.
 
Here are not-so-rare events. 40,000 gun deaths per year. New record in 2020.

Rare? Nope. Common? Yep

How many of those "gun deaths" are suicides? 2/3s? Not that Democrats care. LOL

Over 48,000 Americans commit suicide every year, but Democrats don't care except for the 24,000 that used a gun. Want to guess how many shots are fired in a suicide or the type of weapon used?

How many Democrats are stupid enough to think banning semi-automatic rifles and pistols or high capacity magazines would change that suicide rate?

https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/suicide.shtml
  • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) WISQARS Leading Causes of Death Reports, in 2018:
  • Suicide was the tenth leading cause of death overall in the United States, claiming the lives of over 48,000 people.
  • Suicide was the second leading cause of death among individuals between the ages of 10 and 34, and the fourth leading cause of death among individuals between the ages of 35 and 54.
  • There were more than two and a half times as many suicides (48,344) in the United States as there were homicides (18,830).
 
Here are not-so-rare events. 40,000 gun deaths per year. New record in 2020.

Rare? Nope. Common? Yep

Actually when you do some digging you can find the truth about "Mass Shootings", look at all the "Mass Shootings" WIKI lists, then go down and look at the details. Seems most of these mass shooting are not some person going out and buying a firearm and walking into a store or massage parlor and shooting up the place, the majority are either done by criminals/gangs or others that usually do not even legally own the firearm or do not care spit about the law.
The Devil is in the details...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...previous year , there were 181 more incidents.
 
That first sentence is the most repeated disingenuous line promoted by the gun lobby and anti-gov't, anti (anything they perceive as) liberal types and right wing media punditry. I say this because on one hand you have all these civilian/armchair weapons experts swearing that the anti-gun folk put too credit on the AR-15, as there are plenty more weapons better suited for hunting, mass shooting, etc.

But, when it's pointed out that the AR-15 is extremely popular, and the weapon of choice for the majority of mass shooters and anti-gov't protest yahoos (who can be spotted strapped with them at their protests and rallies sometimes), the response is "well, those deaths are statistically minuscule, so I'd take the risk rather than you take my gun".

That's f***ing sick in my book...pure sociopathic thinking. Or if you like, arrested development .... an adult telling a child they can't have that particular toy as it poses a danger to other children, point to a plethora of similar type toys, and the child throws a tantrum, NO, I WANT THAT ONE BECAUSE I WANT IT!

Your second sentence is also disingenuous, as the Dems have put forth various bills that would incorporate mental illness tags in a universal background check system...only to be shot down by the GOP and kept as a state by state mish mosh

Nice rant, but disagreed for the reasons discussed on this thread and the "Democrats Don't Care" thread.

BTW, claiming someone is disingenuous just because they disagree and explain why they disagree seems to be the new Democratic "big lie". I guess they have to make up for four years of Trump lies, eh? LOL
 
Proves my continuing point that too many weapons are too easily available to too many people that should never have them. And the gun huggers’ response is “more guns”.

What do you think a social media check finds? When my neighbor was undergoing a background check for federal security purposes, they interviewed every neighbor.

this is just one example to show that you dont know what the fuck you are EVER talking about. there is a REASON that the founders denied the federal government to define the limits of their own power AND to add 'shall not be infringed' AND to believe in unalienable rights. their concerns over governments and standing armies included the government not being able to say 'if you're anti government, then you're nuts and have no right to arms'...

they didn't allow it and nor will we, dumbfuck
 
Actually when you do some digging you can find the truth about "Mass Shootings", look at all the "Mass Shootings" WIKI lists, then go down and look at the details. Seems most of these mass shooting are not some person going out and buying a firearm and walking into a store or massage parlor and shooting up the place, the majority are either done by criminals/gangs or others that usually do not even legally own the firearm or do not care spit about the law.
The Devil is in the details...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...previous year , there were 181 more incidents.

Agreed, but Democrats don't care. They don't care about facts and they don't care about truth. They only care about banning guns as proved repeatedly throughout this forum and the news.
 
I'm a hard left progressive liberal who own firearms but still believes that
background checks, assault weapon bans, reasonable licensing requirements to carry concealed weapons in urban areas, and restrictions on open carry in inappropriate areas
are ALL reasonable and compliant with the 2nd Amendment.

I don't think that the 2nd Amendment was very well written.
Private ownership of appropriate firearms should NOT be primarily for the existence of psychotic private militias;
but I don't worship at the altar of our "perfect" constitution anyway.

Gun violence massacres have become as much a routine part of American life as overeating,
and while fewer people probably die from it than from overeating,
the number who do makes us the laughing stock of the civilized world.

We are globally unique, however, in having our gun rights be a constitutionally guaranteed feature of being a citizen in good standing.
This is simple fact that even the most extreme anti-gun people, people far more extreme than I in their ideas, cannot deny.

There are lots of other problems in this nation that can be addressed without running into constitutional argument.
Despite the arguments of morons, our constitution DOES NOT preclude legislation that it doesn't specifically prohibit.
Despite the arguments of morons, our government isn't restricted to doing only what the constitution directs it to do.

The gun violence is reprehensible, but our constitution seems to have inflicted it upon us, and our constitution is all but impossible to amend these days. .

We can get a National Health Service and abolish "right to work" laws WITHOUT running into constitutional roadblocks
except, maybe, for those constitutional provisions that make rural Neanderthals overrepresented in our government.
Shouldn't we work on what we can actually do/
 
Wow! Such a portable and concealable weapon for self-defense. Does Mother let you have just one bullet for your pea-shooter, Barney? :rofl2:

Old fashioned single action revolvers are cool and not a major factor in gun crime.

They really are useful for sport and even home defense, but you wouldn't choose such a weapon to actually commit a crime with which you expected to get away.
[Well, maybe Miss Kitty might--she lives in Dodge City, after all.]

Don't be afraid of Arby's Ruger.
I've got one, too. It's no threat to you.
Be afraid of his fucking AR15.
 
Skinny people are hungry? :lolup:

I doubt there's many fat Somalians. Due to Trump fucking up the COVID response, many Americans are suffering "food insecurity", but I have yet to hear of one actually starving to death like is happening elsewhere around the world.

Example:
https://www.care.org/our-work/disaster-response/emergencies/somalia-food-insecurity-crisis/
Famine was last declared in Somalia six years ago, and more than 260,000 people died – more than half of them children. Nearly half of the deaths occurred before the famine was even declared. It’s expected that the current drought will be worse than in 2011. Three-quarters of the country’s livestock have already died. Goats, camels and crops are Somalis’ bank accounts and farmers have seen their farms go dry and their animals die of hunger and disease in front of them. Cereal production has dropped by 70 percent, and prices are skyrocketing.
 
Old fashioned single action revolvers are cool and not a major factor in gun crime.

They really are useful for sport and even home defense, but you wouldn't choose such a weapon to actually commit a crime with which you expected to get away.
[Well, maybe Miss Kitty might--she lives in Dodge City, after all.]

Don't be afraid of Arby's Ruger.
I've got one, too. It's no threat to you.
Be afraid of his fucking AR15.

How many Americans die of suicide due to a single shot from a revolver? My aunt used a .38. One shot.

Why do Democrats think banning ARs and high capacity magazines would save the lives of over 48,000 Americans suicides every year? Is it because Democrats don't care about saving lives? This thread indicates they only care about banning guns.

BTW, $200 and you can buy yourself a Do-It-Yourself suicide kit plus blackpowder, cap and ball: https://www.dixiegunworks.com/index/page/category/category_id/327/name/Percussion/

PH1305.jpg
 
Back
Top