The true intent of the impeachment......

[Legion]

If so then you should champion the effort to the millions who believe otherwise to present the evidence in an open and public dialog with impartial judgement.

He dare not.

 

[BartenderElite]

There is truth in this. They even ignore a Time article bragging about changing the election.

Nice characterization. I'm sure you're referring to the article where they talked about affecting the outcome by fighting against disinformation?

Is that "fraud", in your estimation? Disinformation has a rightful role in our political process?

 

[AProudLefty]

If that's the case then you would champion all efforts to prove it.

Sure. We have been waiting for the proof. Maybe you'll be the lucky one?

 

[Sailor]

Indeed.

I seem to recall DEMOCRATS (including elected officials) questioning election integrity when they lose.

Yes. All the time.

 

[Legion]

Do the owners pay you to troll the liberals?

Think so?

BTW, there is one owner, conspiracy theorist.

Here's what he had to say recently:

I thank posters like Legion, who is both entertaining and intriguing... He can post as a liberal and/or a conservative and gets under folks' skin, but he definitely makes good conversation.

 

[MAGA MAN]

Sure. We have been waiting for the proof. Maybe you'll be the lucky one?

Again, disingenuous. You, like others, are afraid to look at real data.

 

[Legion]

Yes. All the time.

It's different when they do it, I suppose, Skipper.

 

[AProudLefty]

Again, disingenuous. You, like others, are afraid to look at real data.

I have already looked at the data.

 

[Sailor]

Nice characterization. I'm sure you're referring to the article where they talked about affecting the outcome by fighting against disinformation?

Is that "fraud", in your estimation? Disinformation has a rightful role in our political process?

No. Not that article at all. That was not in it at all. Just how they cheated. And are bragging about it.

 

[Micawber]

Eat shit traitor scum, failure, liar.

 

[Legion]

Again, disingenuous. You, like others, are afraid to look at real data.

They don't seem to have applied evidential standards consistently, do they?

Moscow pee tapes?

Russian collusion....

 

[AProudLefty]

"Good conversation."

I suspect sarcasm.

 

[Legion]

Eat shit traitor scum, failure, liar.

U mad?

 

[AProudLefty]

I have the pee tape.

 

[AProudLefty]

No. Not that article at all. That was not in it at all. Just how they cheated. And are bragging about it.

So why aren't they presenting it already?

 

[Legion]

If you're referring to HC, she conceded the 2016 election the following day.

A mere artifice.

She was still claiming that Trump is an illegitimate president and telling Skeletor to refuse to concede under any circumstances in 2020, wasn't she?

Has Queen Lateetha ever conceded the 2018 Georgia gubernatorial race?

I'll understand if you don't want to answer, of course.

 

[Sailor]

So why aren't they presenting it already?

They have. I would post the whole thing in its entirety however.....I was told by a Mod today that cannot be done anymore. Apparently when posting here to keep it within the intellectual level of most progressives/democrats on this board it cannot consist of anything more than a one sentence tweet or maybe something in the context of the Cat in the Hat or something. I am not kidding.

 

[christiefan915]

By what means would Trump retake the presidency? Damn, sometimes you wonder how this guy gets out of bed and gets dressed in the morning.

Stoney, listen up. There is no process by which the election can be overturned. None. It is not a possibility. Why do you keep coming here and making a fool of yourself? Do you hope that if you throw enough virtual shit against the wall you might hit on something? Nope. Your shit doesn't stick. If you were the blind squirrel in the old saying, you would NOT find the acorn. That's how clueless you are.

Stone's with QAnon and their claims that trump will retake the presidency on March 4. Mark it on your calendar.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1353441192395075584

 

[AProudLefty]

They have. I would post the whole thing in its entirety however.....I was told by a Mod today that cannot be done anymore. Apparently when posting here to keep it within the intellectual level of most progressives/democrats on this board it cannot consist of anything more than a one sentence tweet or maybe something in the context of the Cat in the Hat or something. I am not kidding.

I meant present it in courts. It'd make for a good "evidence" at the impeachment trial.

 

[Sailor]

I meant present it in courts. It'd make for a good "evidence" at the impeachment trial.

It might some day. It would have no bearing on the impeachment. Democrats would never allow their own testimony.