In your bed, both. How many times have you shit your pants since Trump was elected in 2016?
Parler loses court challenge.
- Thread starter Tacomaman
- Start date
In your bed, both. How many times have you shit your pants since Trump was elected in 2016?
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Oh! Okay, bitch: 3: Things happened a couple times. And-?
How many times have you crapped your pants since 2016, dude?
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Was it due to age or drunkenness?
Zero...but I'm not ruling out next year.
I had diarrhea twice and got too drunk once. What did you expect?
I've heard of it but haven't read it. Recommended?
ETA: It's a Kindle Unlimited offering. Just downloaded it!
Labeling something a fallacy does not make phony claims any less phony.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
.
More bullshit, do you ever say anything truthful?
More bullshit, do you ever say anything truthful?
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
.
This on the Parler website!
We are disappointed by the judge’s ruling against our request for a preliminary injunction in our suit against Amazon AWS. We remain confident that we will ultimately prevail in the main case. We also remind everyone that this litigation is still in its early stages and that the resolution of this case will have broad implications for our pluralistic society.
Parler is gratified that the court refused to uncritically accept Amazon’s argument – widely repeated in the media – that the Parler platform was somehow used to plan, coordinate or execute the despicable January 6 riot at the Capitol.
Based on the evidence of which we are aware, the Parler platform was not used in that manner – even though competing platforms clearly were used for that purpose. We are grateful the court refused to join the dishonest attempt to make Parler the scapegoat for the riot.
At the same time, Parler is disappointed that the court’s ruling ignored the reality that every social-media platform – including Amazon’s own online store – sometimes unwittingly hosts content that incites violence or is otherwise inappropriate. In fact, our analysis shows that the incidence of such material on Parler is far lower than on competing platforms. Parler has developed an artificial intelligence-based enforcement system that we believe will reduce the incidence of such content still further.
Parler looks forward to working with old and new partners to reestablish an alternative social-media platform that not only avoids the unnecessary censorship that has become increasingly popular with its competitors, but is also more protective of public safety.
This on the Parler website!
We are disappointed by the judge’s ruling against our request for a preliminary injunction in our suit against Amazon AWS. We remain confident that we will ultimately prevail in the main case. We also remind everyone that this litigation is still in its early stages and that the resolution of this case will have broad implications for our pluralistic society.
Parler is gratified that the court refused to uncritically accept Amazon’s argument – widely repeated in the media – that the Parler platform was somehow used to plan, coordinate or execute the despicable January 6 riot at the Capitol.
Based on the evidence of which we are aware, the Parler platform was not used in that manner – even though competing platforms clearly were used for that purpose. We are grateful the court refused to join the dishonest attempt to make Parler the scapegoat for the riot.
At the same time, Parler is disappointed that the court’s ruling ignored the reality that every social-media platform – including Amazon’s own online store – sometimes unwittingly hosts content that incites violence or is otherwise inappropriate. In fact, our analysis shows that the incidence of such material on Parler is far lower than on competing platforms. Parler has developed an artificial intelligence-based enforcement system that we believe will reduce the incidence of such content still further.
Parler looks forward to working with old and new partners to reestablish an alternative social-media platform that not only avoids the unnecessary censorship that has become increasingly popular with its competitors, but is also more protective of public safety.
Denial of logic. Attempted force of negative proof fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Ignore her, she is batshit crazy!
Sounds like they have decided they need to be pro censorship now.
Interesting re JPP.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Never seen you tell Daesh that!
cancel2 2022
Canceled
They are destined to become huge especially if Trump goes there!
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Just checked he is on there but hasn't posted since the 8th of January.
How do you figure?
They are commiting to take up censorship if they should be allowed back into existence.
Do either you or Candace O know WTF you are talking about?
Thats what the education was for.