Armed Insurrections planned for 1/16-1/20

They have received death threats, so I’m guessing the domestic terrorists.

Nutjobs and amateurs make death threats. Professionals never let on they are coming. ;)

Nevertheless, there seems to be an especially high rate of nutjobs lately. I doubt they would have the cold-blooded skill to build a truck bomb, suicide vest or hijacking. They're more likely to show up with butcher knives, a baseball bat or a pistol. Occasionally there's a McVeigh or Kacinski, but those are very rare.
 
Like this? https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/13/politics/capitol-riot-investigation/index.html

Evidence uncovered so far, including weapons and tactics seen on surveillance video, suggests a level of planning that has led investigators to believe the attack on the US Capitol was not just a protest that spiraled out of control, a federal law enforcement official says.

Among the evidence the FBI is examining are indications that some participants at the Trump rally at the Ellipse, outside the White House, left the event early, perhaps to retrieve items to be used in the assault on the Capitol.

A team of investigators and prosecutors are also focused on the command and control aspect of the attack, looking at travel and communications records to determine if they can build a case that is similar to a counterterrorism investigation, the official said.

Indeed, the rally, and all of trump's previous comments about a stolen election should be included as evidence of incitement
 
I thought the impeachment did exactly that.

It did.

I need to read the articles of impeachment... LOL


On January 6, 2021, pursuant to the 12th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the Vice President of the United States, the House of Representatives, and the Senate met at the United States Capitol for a Joint Session of Congress to count the votes of the Electoral College. In the months preceding the Joint Session, President Trump repeatedly issued false statements asserting that the Presidential election results were the product of widespread fraud and should not be accepted by the American people or certified by State or Federal officials. Shortly before the Joint Session commenced, President Trump, addressed a crowd at the Ellipse in Washington, D.C. There, he reiterated false claims that "we won this election, and we won it by a landslide." He also willfully made statements that, in context, encouraged — and foreseeably resulted in — lawless action at the Capitol, such as: "if you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore." Thus incited by President Trump, members of the crowd he had addressed, in an attempt to, among other objectives, interfere with the Joint Session's solemn constitutional duty to certify the results of the 2020 Presidential election, unlawfully breached and vandalized the Capitol, injured and killed law enforcement personnel, menaced Members of Congress, the Vice President, and Congressional personnel, and engaged in other violent, deadly, destructive and seditious acts.

https://www.npr.org/sections/trump-...ement-of-capitol-insurrection?t=1610660589815
 
And a speech that literally said the words posted previously.

Sorry, man, but I'm not a fucking lawyer or a politician. If some BLM asshole had given such a speech then pointed a mob at town hall resulting in 5 deaths and over 50 police officers injured, is there any doubt between us that you would hold that asshole responsible just like I would?

It is hard to prove the riot would not have happened without the words spoken by someone who urged them on. During the Vietnam War protests there were many charges of inciting to riot and most of those convictions were overturned.

"A 1969 Supreme Court ruling that tossed the conviction of a Ku Klux Klan leader may also shield President Donald Trump from prosecution for inciting last week’s Capitol riot, leaving few alternatives to hold him accountable if impeachment efforts fail.

The case, in which the American Civil Liberties Union represented Brandenburg, set a high bar for criminal prosecutions of inflammatory speech. To make the case that Trump incited the riot, prosecutors would have to show that he intended to provoke violence, but his words are vague enough that it’s possible to argue that he was simply urging his supporters to peacefully protest outside the Capitol.

“Intention to incite is always difficult to show,” said Shirin Sinnar, a law professor at Stanford who studies the legal treatment of political violence. “A lot of the evidence here can be interpreted in different ways.”'

Also: https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...5b7932-51ec-11eb-a1f5-fdaf28cfca90_story.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/11/us/politics/donald-trump-crime.html
 
Like this? https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/13/politics/capitol-riot-investigation/index.html

Evidence uncovered so far, including weapons and tactics seen on surveillance video, suggests a level of planning that has led investigators to believe the attack on the US Capitol was not just a protest that spiraled out of control, a federal law enforcement official says.

Among the evidence the FBI is examining are indications that some participants at the Trump rally at the Ellipse, outside the White House, left the event early, perhaps to retrieve items to be used in the assault on the Capitol.

A team of investigators and prosecutors are also focused on the command and control aspect of the attack, looking at travel and communications records to determine if they can build a case that is similar to a counterterrorism investigation, the official said.

Wait.....this goes directly against the thread that idiot Mcawber started earlier saying that it was highly unorganized, no plan, just a bunch of dumb rubes staggering around with no rhyme or reason and no leadership.

You guys REALLY need to have some kind of meeting so you can decide which narrative you want to push. :)
 
Indeed, the rally, and all of trump's previous comments about a stolen election should be included as evidence of incitement

Like these comments?

“There was a widespread understanding that this election was not on the level. We still don’t know what really happened. No, it doesn’t kill me because he knows he’s an illegitimate president. I believe he understands that the many varying tactics they used, from voter suppression and voter purging to hacking to the false stories — he knows that — there were just a bunch of different reasons why the election turned out like it did.”
 
Nutjobs and amateurs make death threats. Professionals never let on they are coming. ;)

Nevertheless, there seems to be an especially high rate of nutjobs lately. I doubt they would have the cold-blooded skill to build a truck bomb, suicide vest or hijacking. They're more likely to show up with butcher knives, a baseball bat or a pistol. Occasionally there's a McVeigh or Kacinski, but those are very rare.
Maxine Waters and AOC aren’t afraid, they are use to it, they know what your speaking, but it’s still good to be on high alert.
 
You always exaggerate reality and try to add drama. Some of those people probably did have the intent to riot, the other thousands of people who did not enter the Capitol may very well have intended to put pressure on Congress.

You claimed Trump would delay the election, then you said cancel the election, then you said he would refuse to leave office. None of those were true, but they intended to create overly dramatic fear.
Do you ever wonder why? ;)

Agreed most went there just for a regular political rally. It's been a week and the investigation is early but there are a lot of indications this rally and the attack were pre-planned. By whom remains a mystery. I'm sure our patriots in government will track down the terrorists.
 
Chief sitting faggot is known antifa dumbass

Wrong again, dumbass. It's amazing how often you can be wrong, dumbass. Do you ever get tired of being wrong, dumbass?

The heavily painted man wearing a horned fur hat who made a spectacle of himself on the dais of the US Senate during the storming of the Capitol has been identified as a QAnon supporter and fixture at far-right rallies in Arizona, according to a report.

Jake Angeli, 32, was seen posing in the chair occupied moments earlier by Vice President Mike Pence at the beginning of the election certification proceedings, which were halted when the riot began.

The shirtless conspiracy theorist — known as the “Q Shaman” — wore red, white and blue face paint as he brandished a spear from which hung an American flag.

In 2020, Angeli told the Arizona Republic that he wears the headgear and paint to attract attention as he talks about QAnon, which claims that a vast network of powerful people are behind a large pedophile ring — including the viral “pizzagate” conspiracy that falsely claimed one such ring ran out of a Washington, DC, pizza shop.


iu
 
Maxine Waters and AOC aren’t afraid, they are use to it, they know what your speaking, but it’s still good to be on high alert.

It's always wise to be cautious and have self-awareness. Avoid unnecessarily risky situations, but don't let it control one's life.

People who give in to fear become the weakest links in the chain of our nation. :)
 
So this sounds to me like an express call to violence, so I'm going to send this post on over to the FBI, and they can deal with you.

The militarization of Washington DC is an express call to violence?????? :bang:
You think the FBI is not aware that troops are moving into Washington DC?????? :palm:
 
"Stop the steal" shouldn't be marginalized like that.

Trump's incitement has been going on for months - even prior to the election. He has done almost nothing except for messaging that this election was STOLEN - it was rigged, and there was "massive fraud." A constant, unrelenting drumbeat.

And that repetition was parroted by politicians and pundits everywhere.

And then people wonder why so many believe the election was stolen, and why there was a riot last week. There is direct correlation here. I would only agree w/ you that it is thin legally - but there is zero question as to why these elements of our society have been stirred up and pushed to a breaking point. It's one dude.

Trump doesn't command Antifa, which caused the riot.
 
Nutjobs and amateurs make death threats. Professionals never let on they are coming.
So that means you are a nutjob and an amateur, by your own definition. You have already made death threats here.
Nevertheless, there seems to be an especially high rate of nutjobs lately. I doubt they would have the cold-blooded skill to build a truck bomb, suicide vest or hijacking.
You mean the nutjobs that bombed the World Trade Center with truck bombs (unsuccessfully) and later bombed it again by hijacking airliners??? :palm:
They're more likely to show up with butcher knives, a baseball bat or a pistol. Occasionally there's a McVeigh or Kacinski, but those are very rare.
So you say that McVeigh was a professional and not a nut job? He built a truck bomb and no one knew he was targeting the Oklahoma federal building until the truck exploded.

You are in paradox. You are being irrational.
 
Indeed, the rally, and all of trump's previous comments about a stolen election should be included as evidence of incitement

So the thousands of witnesses, the videos of people pulling suitcases of ballots out of from under desks to be counted after hours, the illegal changing of election laws by unauthorized individuals, etc.; is evidence of incitement? These are not Trump's comments. They are public record.
 
Back
Top