Naw....no fraud. cleanest election in history....

The only reason anyone thinks there is fraud is because Trump says so, and the only reason Trump says so is because he can't cope with losing.

It's a pretty simple equation. There was no "massive fraud" in this election. Trump lost handily.
 
BartenderElite said:
The only reason anyone thinks there is fraud is because Trump says so, and the only reason Trump says so is because he can't cope with losing.

It's a pretty simple equation. There was no "massive fraud" in this election. Trump lost handily.
Click to expand...

Trump won in a landslide. We both know that.
 
Dark Soul said:
Trump won in a landslide. We both know that.
Click to expand...

He lost by over 7 million in the popular vote, and Biden had 306 electoral votes.

It wasn't close. Trump tried to make it a base election, but his base isn't big enough. You have to build coalitions and attract independents. He didn't do that.
 
BartenderElite said:
He lost by over 7 million in the popular vote, and Biden had 306 electoral votes.

It wasn't close. Trump tried to make it a base election, but his base isn't big enough. You have to build coalitions and attract independents. He didn't do that.
Click to expand...

You failed to understand the video in the OP. Did you even watch it?
 
[FONT=&quot]Putting everything else aside, how profoundly stupid do you have to be to believe that the founders intended for the vice president to be able to select the next president regardless of official election results? Why is former Vice President John Nance Garner’s verdict that the job isn’t worth a “bucket of warm spit” (or in some versions, a more noxious form of bodily effluvia) the only thing for which anyone remembers Garner?[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]According to this theory, then-Vice President Dick Cheney could have rejected Barack Obama’s electors and installed John McCain as president in early 2009. Heck, Al Gore, who was vice president in 2000, could have rejected George W. Bush’s Florida electoral votes and named himself president. According to Gohmert & Co. this would have been perfectly legal and constitutional.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I should note that if you take this idea seriously, not only would the vice president be massively more powerful than anybody ever thought, but the very idea of federal elections and federalism itself would be rendered null and void. A single highly partisan politician could simply override the will of the states, and the electorate generally, and pick the winner. Why not just have the debates in the vice president’s living room from now on?

Jonah Goldberg[/FONT]
 
Micawber said:
[FONT="]Putting everything else aside, how profoundly stupid do you have to be to believe that the founders intended for the vice president to be able to select the next president regardless of official election results? Why is former Vice President John Nance Garner’s verdict that the job isn’t worth a “bucket of warm spit” (or in some versions, a more noxious form of bodily effluvia) the only thing for which anyone remembers Garner?[/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#333333][FONT="]According to this theory, then-Vice President Dick Cheney could have rejected Barack Obama’s electors and installed John McCain as president in early 2009. Heck, Al Gore, who was vice president in 2000, could have rejected George W. Bush’s Florida electoral votes and named himself president. According to Gohmert & Co. this would have been perfectly legal and constitutional.[/FONT]
[FONT="]I should note that if you take this idea seriously, not only would the vice president be massively more powerful than anybody ever thought, but the very idea of federal elections and federalism itself would be rendered null and void. A single highly partisan politician could simply override the will of the states, and the electorate generally, and pick the winner. Why not just have the debates in the vice president’s living room from now on?

Jonah Goldberg[/FONT]
Click to expand...

Gee,...I cant imagine why you would want to deflect away from the OP as quickly as possible. :rolleyes:
 
Dark Soul said:
You failed to understand the video in the OP. Did you even watch it?
Click to expand...

Nope. I don't waste my time anymore.

We've had dozens - if not hundreds - of "this is it!" videos, pictures, "eyewitness accounts" and general stories since election day. Every one of them has been completely debunked. There is literally nothing that has held up.

The boy has cried wolf for 2 months at this point.
 
BartenderElite said:
Nope. I don't waste my time anymore.

We've had dozens - if not hundreds - of "this is it!" videos, pictures, "eyewitness accounts" and general stories since election day. Every one of them has been completely debunked. There is literally nothing that has held up.

The boy has cried wolf for 2 months at this point.
Click to expand...

Bingo, couldn't have put it any better, as I just commented above, if one keeps believing right wing wacko sights Trump will be winning by trillions if not infinity before long
 
Dark Soul said:
Trump won in a landslide. We both know that.
Click to expand...

tenor.gif
 
Here is Scott Adams changing his tune over the fraud issue based on a GA committee hearing where an expert claims the cumulative vote tally was impossible. And that Democrats mistake was in getting the nerds interested because:

"If the nerds get interested, they're gonna find your sh!t." Lol

 
Darth Omar said:
Here is Scott Adams changing his tune over the fraud issue based on a GA committee hearing where an expert claims the cumulative vote tally was impossible. And that Democrats mistake was in getting the nerds interested because:

"If the nerds get interested, they're gonna find your sh!t." Lol

Click to expand...

The Dems only "mistake" was having their Presidential candidate win an election.

The Republicans, however, are making much more egregious mistakes right now, and seem likely to on 1/6 as well. I don't think voters will soon forget that the GOP is trying to disenfranchise them.
 
BartenderElite said:
The Dems only "mistake" was having their Presidential candidate win an election.

The Republicans, however, are making much more egregious mistakes right now, and seem likely to on 1/6 as well. I don't think voters will soon forget that the GOP is trying to disenfranchise them.
Click to expand...

Do you honestly think voters are going to forget the last for years of Democrat bullshit?
 
Sailor said:
Do you honestly think voters are going to forget the last for years of Democrat bullshit?
Click to expand...

You're conflating 2 different things. Since Whitewater, Travelgate & impeachment in the '90's, opposition parties have tried to undermine the Presidencies of those they lost to.

What the GOP is doing right now is wholly different. Their hope on 1/6 lies in nullifying the votes in at least 2-3 states if not more, and having legislators decide the election instead of voters.

That's not the same ballpark, or planet.
 
Last edited:
BartenderElite said:
You're conflating 2 different things. Since Whitewater, Travelgate & impeachment in the '90's, opposition parties have tried to undermine the Presidencies of those they lost to.

What the GOP is doing right now is wholly different. Their hope on 1/6 lies in nullifying the votes in at least 2-3 states if not more, and having legislators decide the election instead of voters.

That's not the same ballpark, or planet.
Click to expand...

That seems to be your favorite fall back when faced with the truth. "It is two different things". The fact is there is no difference. Democrats did their best to fuck over this country for the last 4 years. And most certainly will continue that for at least the next two. Voters do not forget things like that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top