S.O.S. from Biden's coming foreign policy

domer76 said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
I don't know about that. I'm dealing with THIS video and it's content. WHAT EXACTLY is wrong or innaccurate in what she says here?
Click to expand...


I didn’t get through it. I saw the first portion, noted her name and looked her up. After seeing her credibility, I decided I would waste no more time on a person like that.
Click to expand...

Where as before I pass judgement, I actually READ the information put forth (whether I like the source or not) and research it BEFORE I make a determination as to accuracy, validity, etc. Call it the "broken clock" approach. What you've done is a prime example of why you have people running around being proudly willfully ignorant while parroting half truths and misinformation as if it's gospel truth....that goes for liberals and conservatives. Prejudical attitudes and letting others tell you what is and isn't is not good. Just saying.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Where as before I pass judgement, I actually READ the information put forth (whether I like the source or not) and research it BEFORE I make a determination as to accuracy, validity, etc. Call it the "broken clock" approach. What you've done is a prime example of why you have people running around being proudly willfully ignorant while parroting half truths and misinformation as if it's gospel truth....that goes for liberals and conservatives. Prejudical attitudes and letting others tell you what is and isn't is not good. Just saying.
Click to expand...

She's a conspiracy freak. 9/11 truther and fluoridation nut. Go ahead and believe whatever she has to say. I'm not interested in listening to kooks.
 
Bill said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
You can easily check her statements....not Wiki based.
Click to expand...


I have..

I was actually reading the wiki on her while listening to the youtube....

Does not matter, I know the info is correct, I lived through that horrible time...

Many defended/& excused away Obama's assassinations on streets & apartment buildings killing many totally innocent ppl...

I really only had one thing to say about it~if another country was doing it, in your town, say like Russia, CHina, Iran etc would you think it is ok, would you excuse it, end justify the means....

The story looks a lot different when it is someone elses leader or judge making the decision that one/many of your ppl are going to be killed along w/ anyone else near by......

Collateral damage is justifiable~that is long as we are not the damage.........
Click to expand...

A sobering point.
 
4ar9ac.jpg



33900604-8797417-image-a-52_1601639143381.jpg
 
domer76 said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Where as before I pass judgement, I actually READ the information put forth (whether I like the source or not) and research it BEFORE I make a determination as to accuracy, validity, etc. Call it the "broken clock" approach. What you've done is a prime example of why you have people running around being proudly willfully ignorant while parroting half truths and misinformation as if it's gospel truth....that goes for liberals and conservatives. Prejudical attitudes and letting others tell you what is and isn't is not good. Just saying.
Click to expand...


She's a conspiracy freak. 9/11 truther and fluoridation nut. Go ahead and believe whatever she has to say. I'm not interested in listening to kooks.
Click to expand...

Again, you dodge the important point and question.....CAN YOU LOGICALLY AND FACTUALLY FAULT THE CONTENT OF HER BROADCAST HERE? If you can't, then all your accusatory barking is irrelevant.

Let me put it this way, remember Drudge? A piss poor excuse for a journalist who was nothing more than a dime a dozen net blogger who suddenly shot to fame and recognition because he broke the Monica Lewinsky story. Like I said, the "broken clock" approach to any and all information can yield useful information. You can bluff and bluster all you want, but you can't get pass this one truism.
 
dukkha said:
Gates: "Biden Has Been Wrong On Nearly Every Major Foreign Policy Question".
Click to expand...

Now here's the thing where Joe was (IMHO) correct: "Biden was the most senior dissenting voice against a surge in Afghanistan back in 2008 and 2009," says Andrew Watkins, senior analyst for Afghanistan at the International Crisis Group. "He remained insistent throughout the last decade that bringing American troop numbers down to just a few thousand and really only focusing on targeted strikes of the very worst of the very worst threats to regional and American security was the only thing that the U.S. should be doing in Afghanistan."

https://www.npr.org/2020/11/18/935351710/what-a-joe-biden-presidency-may-mean-for-afghanistan

Biden has spoken in favor of keeping a small counterterrorism force in Afghanistan.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Again, you dodge the important point and question.....CAN YOU LOGICALLY AND FACTUALLY FAULT THE CONTENT OF HER BROADCAST HERE? If you can't, then all your accusatory barking is irrelevant.

Let me put it this way, remember Drudge? A piss poor excuse for a journalist who was nothing more than a dime a dozen net blogger who suddenly shot to fame and recognition because he broke the Monica Lewinsky story. Like I said, the "broken clock" approach to any and all information can yield useful information. You can bluff and bluster all you want, but you can't get pass this one truism.
Click to expand...

Let's repeat, pal. I MADE NO COMMENT ABOUT THE CONTENT. Comprende?

I do my homework. Had I given a flying shit enough to listen to some conspiracy nut's opinion on something, I would research the veracity of it. For her, my give-a-fuck is missing.
 
domer76 said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Again, you dodge the important point and question.....CAN YOU LOGICALLY AND FACTUALLY FAULT THE CONTENT OF HER BROADCAST HERE? If you can't, then all your accusatory barking is irrelevant.

Let me put it this way, remember Drudge? A piss poor excuse for a journalist who was nothing more than a dime a dozen net blogger who suddenly shot to fame and recognition because he broke the Monica Lewinsky story. Like I said, the "broken clock" approach to any and all information can yield useful information. You can bluff and bluster all you want, but you can't get pass this one truism.
Click to expand...


Let's repeat, pal. I MADE NO COMMENT ABOUT THE CONTENT. Comprende?

I do my homework. Had I given a flying shit enough to listen to some conspiracy nut's opinion on something, I would research the veracity of it. For her, my give-a-fuck is missing.
Click to expand...

You're not too bright, are ya bunky? Please learn to read carefully and comprehensively. I've made a point that YOU admit you barely listened to the video before you bailed out, did a Wiki search (c'mon man, Wiki-leaks? Proven to be unreliable six ways to Sunday) and settled in your mental comfort zone of labels (conspiracy nut, etc.). You didn't do "homework", you just scanned and skimmed for what backed your supposition and conjecture. Capice'? The sheer proud ignorance of your braying is pathetic.

You demonstrate a lame attempt to justify your willful ignorance and inability to factually and logically disprove or fault what the woman is saying. Any fool can do what you do...we've had one in the White House for 4 years. You see, as a rational adult, I tend to want to factually and logically prove someone wrong (that's how the nuns taught me, and what later college professors called "critical thinking) rather than just blowing smoke as you do here.

So stop wasting time and effort with this BS of yours. Clearly you can't meet a simple burden of proof, so you talk loud but say nothing. You may have the last predictable accusation, reiteration, as it's pointless to waste more time responding to your dreck. Carry on.
 
Taichiliberal said:
You're not too bright, are ya bunky? Please learn to read carefully and comprehensively. I've made a point that YOU admit you barely listened to the video before you bailed out, did a Wiki search (c'mon man, Wiki-leaks? Proven to be unreliable six ways to Sunday) and settled in your mental comfort zone of labels (conspiracy nut, etc.). You didn't do "homework", you just scanned and skimmed for what backed your supposition and conjecture. Capice'? The sheer proud ignorance of your braying is pathetic.

You demonstrate a lame attempt to justify your willful ignorance and inability to factually and logically disprove or fault what the woman is saying. Any fool can do what you do...we've had one in the White House for 4 years. You see, as a rational adult, I tend to want to factually and logically prove someone wrong (that's how the nuns taught me, and what later college professors called "critical thinking) rather than just blowing smoke as you do here.

So stop wasting time and effort with this BS of yours. Clearly you can't meet a simple burden of proof, so you talk loud but say nothing. You may have the last predictable accusation, reiteration, as it's pointless to waste more time responding to your dreck. Carry on.
Click to expand...

I read her history, pally boy. RT. 9/11 truther. You go ahead and hang your hat on a fucking kook. My give-a-fuck on what she has to say is missing.
 
domer76 said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
You're not too bright, are ya bunky? Please learn to read carefully and comprehensively. I've made a point that YOU admit you barely listened to the video before you bailed out, did a Wiki search (c'mon man, Wiki-leaks? Proven to be unreliable six ways to Sunday) and settled in your mental comfort zone of labels (conspiracy nut, etc.). You didn't do "homework", you just scanned and skimmed for what backed your supposition and conjecture. Capice'? The sheer proud ignorance of your braying is pathetic.

You demonstrate a lame attempt to justify your willful ignorance and inability to factually and logically disprove or fault what the woman is saying. Any fool can do what you do...we've had one in the White House for 4 years. You see, as a rational adult, I tend to want to factually and logically prove someone wrong (that's how the nuns taught me, and what later college professors called "critical thinking) rather than just blowing smoke as you do here.

So stop wasting time and effort with this BS of yours. Clearly you can't meet a simple burden of proof, so you talk loud but say nothing. You may have the last predictable accusation, reiteration, as it's pointless to waste more time responding to your dreck. Carry on.
Click to expand...



I read her history, pally boy. RT. 9/11 truther. You go ahead and hang your hat on a fucking kook. My give-a-fuck on what she has to say is missing.
Click to expand...

You already told the readers what you read and what's your source, bunky. I already covered that. Jeez, are you fucking stupid or just insipidly stubborn? Learn to read carefully and comprehensively. You're done. See ya.
 
Taichiliberal said:
And how does that change the following FACT?: Boris Johnson is set to win a majority in Parliament, securing his position as UK prime minister. His victory is a near-guarantee the United Kingdom will leave the European Union at the end of January. https://www.vox.com/2019/7/23/20707069/who-is-boris-johnson-uk-election-brexit


Primo, you're just another intellectually impotent right wing wonk with delusions of intelligence. Every time you come out against my posts, you get your ass (or "arse" if you prefer) handed to you, then you just go into parrot mode or just disappear. Tell you what, blow some more smoke, claim victory and go away. Always good for a laugh.
Click to expand...

You clearly have little to no understanding of the background to Brexit, I could educate you but what's the point you're clearly impervious to reason and rationality so I'll leave you to your delusions, Bunky!
 
Taichiliberal said:
Yep, Uncle Joe has been selling his brand as a "return to sanity" ... but his appointees for our foreign policy and such seems a major step backwards towards the Cold War days (or some facsimile there of). Check this out...scary stuff.

Click to expand...

She makes a lot of sense just surprised that you follow her.
 
Primavera said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
And how does that change the following FACT?: Boris Johnson is set to win a majority in Parliament, securing his position as UK prime minister. His victory is a near-guarantee the United Kingdom will leave the European Union at the end of January. https://www.vox.com/2019/7/23/207070...lection-brexit


Primo, you're just another intellectually impotent right wing wonk with delusions of intelligence. Every time you come out against my posts, you get your ass (or "arse" if you prefer) handed to you, then you just go into parrot mode or just disappear. Tell you what, blow some more smoke, claim victory and go away. Always good for a laugh.
Click to expand...



You clearly have little to no understanding of the background to Brexit, I could educate you but what's the point you're clearly impervious to reason and rationality so I'll leave you to your delusions, Bunky!
Click to expand...

For the objective, rational reader; from my link: It’s a triumph for the 55-year-old Conservative member of Parliament, former foreign minister, and former mayor of London. An ardent backer of Brexit, Johnson has a reputation for brashness, bending the truth, and bad hair, which has earned him comparisons to President Donald Trump (who is a fan of his).

Johnson can be cringeworthy, but that’s also part of his charm. His critics see him as a calculating self-aggrandizer who’d do or say anything to succeed. He’s generated controversy over racist, sexist, and Islamophobic statements he’s made.

This is why Primo is just another right wing joke from "across the pond". He can't deal with complete content, just out of context quotes he attaches to the guff he mentally flatulates. This is why I put his dumb ass (or 'arse', as the Brits say) on IA, because trolls just eventually babble like parrots.
 
Primavera said:
She makes a lot of sense just surprised that you follow her.
Click to expand...

I don't....a friend sent the link. I don't know her history, just that no right wing wonk can fault her here....nor can they pretend that this crap didn't go on before Obama in USA policy.

See, unlike you I listen and read thoroughly before I conclude. That is why I'm putting your dopey ass on IA....I could give a damn what surprises your right wingnut mind.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top